GCU 801 Topic 8 Post-conference Evaluation Individual Success Plan

Grand Canyon University GCU 801 Topic 8 Post-conference Evaluation Individual Success Plan-Step-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Grand Canyon University GCU 801 Topic 8 Post-conference Evaluation Individual Success Plan assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for GCU 801 Topic 8 Post-conference Evaluation Individual Success Plan                       

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Grand Canyon University GCU 801 Topic 8 Post-conference Evaluation Individual Success Plan depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for GCU 801 Topic 8 Post-conference Evaluation Individual Success Plan                       

The introduction for the Grand Canyon University GCU 801 Topic 8 Post-conference Evaluation Individual Success Plan is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

How to Write the Body for GCU 801 Topic 8 Post-conference Evaluation Individual Success Plan                       

After the introduction, move into the main part of the GCU 801 Topic 8 Post-conference Evaluation Individual Success Plan  assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for GCU 801 Topic 8 Post-conference Evaluation Individual Success Plan                       

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for GCU 801 Topic 8 Post-conference Evaluation Individual Success Plan                       

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the GCU 801 Topic 8 Post-conference Evaluation Individual Success Plan assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

GCU 801 Topic 8 Post-conference Evaluation Individual Success Plan

GCU 801 Topic 8 Post-conference Evaluation Individual Success Plan

The Individual Success Plan (ISP) assignment in this course requires your collaboration with the course faculty early on to establish a plan for successful completion of mutually identified and agreed-upon specific deliverables for your programmatic requirements. Programmatic requirements are: (1) completion of required practice immersion hours, (2) completion of work associated with program competencies, and (3) work associated with completion of your Direct Practice Improvement (DPI) Project.

A postconference evaluation is mandatory for DNP-815A, DNP-840A, DNP-830A, DNP-955A, DNP-960A, DNP-965A, and requires learners to use the ISP form. This is intended for the learner and preceptor/mentor to review and evaluate the completion of the ISP. The faculty will validate that all areas are at “Meets Expectations” on the preceptor/mentor evaluation form, located in Lopes Activity Tracker, prior to progression. The learner will upload the ISP and preceptor/mentor evaluations and proof of entered and approved practice immersion hours into the digital classroom by Topic 8 with the other required deliverables.

Faculty will review this before filling out the faculty evaluation of the learner in Typhon or Lopes Activity Tracker, which the learner will also upload in Topic 8. The course faculty will complete a separate evaluation of the learner’s performance in the classroom. The faculty is responsible for any course grading, final course grade, and validation of the learner’s’ completed practice immersion hours.

General Requirements:

Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment as it pertains to deliverables due in this course.
• Use the Individual Success Plan (ISP) developed in Topic 1 as a personal plan for completing your practice immersion hours and how competencies will be met. All of the major milestones and deliverables should be indicated in the timeline.
• While an ISP is required, unless you have a mentor, a mentor signature is not required for this course. A preconference and a postconference/evaluation between learners and preceptors/mentors are mandatory for all learners enrolled in all DNP courses (from DNP-815A on). Conferences may be conducted face-to-face or via technology. A copy of the wet-ink or digitally (digital identifier) signed document must be uploaded into the digital classroom no later than the end of Topic 8.
• Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
• This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to the beginning to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
• You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.
• Learners will submit this assignment using the assignment dropbox in the digital classroom. In addition, learners must upload this deliverable to the Learner Dissertation Page (LDP) in the DNP PI Workspace for later use.

Directions:

1. Identify the specific deliverables you will complete throughout this course from those defined above with your faculty. Update your faculty/chair with any revisions or changes to the ISP.
2. List the challenges you expect to encounter as you continue the practice immersion hour and competency requirements throughout this course. How might you overcome these challenges?
3. Complete the Contact Information table at the beginning of the ISP resource, and type in your signature (learner only) and the date on which you completed the table. Read the information in the ISP document, including the following: Learner Expectations, Derivation of the ISP, and Instructions for Completing the ISP.
4. Follow the instructions and complete the ISP.
5. Postconference Evaluation: Individual Success Plan (ISP) – Rubric
6. Collapse All Postconference Evaluation: Individual Success Plan (ISP) – RubricCollapse All
7. Completed ISP
8. 19 points
9. Criteria Description
10. The ISP is completed.
11. 5. Target
12. 19 points
13. The ISP is completed.
14. 4. Acceptable
15. 17.48 points
16. N/A
17. 3. Approaching
18. 16.72 points
19. N/A
20. 2. Insufficient
21. 15.2 points
22. N/A
23. 1. Unsatisfactory
24. 0 points
25. The ISP is not completed.
26. Paper Format
27. 1 points
28. Criteria Description
29. Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment.
30. 5. Target
31. 1 points
32. All format elements are correct.
33. 4. Acceptable
34. 0.92 points
35. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
36. 3. Approaching
37. 0.88 points
38. Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
39. 2. Insufficient
40. 0.8 points
41. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.
42. 1. Unsatisfactory
43. 0 points
44. Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.
45. Total 20 points

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: GCU 801 Topic 8 Post-conference Evaluation Individual Success Plan 

Discussion Questions (DQ)

• Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, include a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words.
• Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source.
• One or two sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words.
• I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.

Weekly Participation

• Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately.
• In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies.
• Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work).
• Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.

APA Format and Writing Quality

• Familiarize yourself with APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required).
• Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation.
• I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.

Use of Direct Quotes

• I discourage overutilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Masters’ level and deduct points accordingly.
• As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content.
• It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source.

LopesWrite Policy

• For assignments that need to be submitted to LopesWrite, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me.
• Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes.
• Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own?
• Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.

Late Policy

• The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies.
• Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances.
• If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect.
• I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension.
• As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.

Communication

• Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me:
o Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class.
o Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.

TOPIC 1 INTRODUCTION

Congratulations on your acceptance into the Doctor of Nursing Practice program at Grand Canyon University. Earning a DNP is a major milestone for you personally and a significant contribution to your community and profession. In keeping with the expectations of DNP professionals, learners enrolled in this program are expected to display courteous and professional conduct and develop strong scholarly skills. This course will begin to prepare you for your professional journey.

In a few words, explain how your future role as a Doctor of Nursing Practice leader will serve your profession and your personal community. On a personal level, what do you expect to achieve from this program? (This response does not require research support.)

Review the “Discussion Forum Philosophy” located in the Class Resources. You are expected to post in the forum according to these guidelines without further prompting for the duration of the program.

According to the findings of a report by the American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN), the growing demands of America’s complex healthcare system require the most advanced levels of scientific knowledge, and expertise in practice for good health outcomes (McCauley et al., 2020).  Therefore, with the rapid evolvement of the US healthcare system, there is an increasing demand for highly influential doctorate-level nurse leaders competent at managing change in unstable environs. However, presently, there is a shortage of doctorate-level nurses. With a doctorate degree, the author will be able to not only strengthen her skills but also build her expertise and advance her nursing career. As supported by Edwards et al., (2018) a doctoral degree is crucial in promoting autonomy, professional leadership in nursing education and research, and professional development.

In regards to the nursing profession, in future, the author will be able to engage in improving the effectiveness, quality, and efficiency of healthcare systems through health policy advocacy, clinical practice, evidence-based research, and nursing education. The DNP program will provide the leadership skills and knowledge needed to lead nurses and nursing teams deliver the best and optimum care in practice. The doctorate degree will provide the author with the qualifications for a high-level position, which can serve as an avenue for transforming the field of nursing through policy and research.

At community level, as a DNP leader, the author will be able to focus on leading community–based health programs and supporting them in state and federal legislative committees. According to Aveling et al., (2017), community based approaches to healthcare continue to receive the most attention since they easily provide avenues to share knowledge efficiently and strategies to influence health-related behaviors. Form this DNP program, the author expects to acquire advanced nursing science knowledge to apply in clinical practice, academia, and in advancing the nursing career.

References

Aveling, E. L., Martin, G., Herbert, G., & Armstrong, N. (2017). Optimising the community-based approach to healthcare improvement: Comparative case studies of the clinical community model in practice. Social science & medicine (1982), 173, 96–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.11.026

Edwards, N. E., Coddington, J., Erler, C., & Kirkpatrick, J. (2018). The Impact of the Role of Doctor of Nursing PracticeNurses on Healthcare and Leadership. Medical Research Archives, 6(4).

McCauley, L. A., Broome, M. E., Frazier, L., Hayes, R., Kurth, A., Musil, C. M., Norman, L. D., Rideout, K. H., & Villarruel, A. M. (2020). Doctor of nursing practice (DNP) degree in the United States: Reflecting, readjusting, and getting back on track. Nursing outlook, 68(4), 494–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2020.03.008

General Requirements:

Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment as it pertains to deliverables due in this course.

• Use the Individual Success Plan (ISP) developed in Topic 1 as a personal plan for completing your practice immersion hours and how competencies will be met. All of the major milestones and deliverables should be indicated in the timeline.
• While an ISP is required, unless you have a mentor, a mentor signature is not required for this course. A preconference and a postconference/evaluation between learners and preceptors/mentors are mandatory for all learners enrolled in all DNP courses (from DNP-815A on). Conferences may be conducted face-to-face or via technology. A copy of the wet-ink or digitally (digital identifier) signed document must be uploaded into the digital classroom no later than the end of Topic 8.
• Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
• This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to the beginning to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
• You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.
• Learners will submit this assignment using the assignment dropbox in the digital classroom. In addition, learners must upload this deliverable to the Learner Dissertation Page (LDP) in the DNP PI Workspace for later use.

Directions:

1. Identify the specific deliverables you will complete throughout this course from those defined above with your faculty. Update your faculty/chair with any revisions or changes to the ISP.
2. List the challenges you expect to encounter as you continue the practice immersion hour and competency requirements throughout this course. How might you overcome these challenges?
3. Complete the Contact Information table at the beginning of the ISP resource, and type in your signature (learner only) and the date on which you completed the table. Read the information in the ISP document, including the following: Learner Expectations, Derivation of the ISP, and Instructions for Completing the ISP.
4. Follow the instructions and complete the ISP.

Postconference Evaluation: Individual Success Plan (ISP) – Rubric

Collapse All Postconference Evaluation: Individual Success Plan (ISP) – RubricCollapse All

Completed ISP

19 points

Criteria Description

The ISP is completed.

5. Target

19 points

The ISP is completed.

4. Acceptable

17.48 points

N/A

3. Approaching

16.72 points

N/A

2. Insufficient

15.2 points

N/A

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The ISP is not completed.

Paper Format

1 points

Criteria Description

Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment.

5. Target

1 points

All format elements are correct.

4. Acceptable

0.92 points

Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

3. Approaching

0.88 points

Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

2. Insufficient

0.8 points

Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

 Post-conference Evaluation: Individual Success Plan 

 

Application Based Learning Course Assignments	Number of Planned Immersion Hours Associated with each Assignment or Project	Due Date	Review Course Objectives and GCU DNP Domains and Competencies. Create a plan for the practice experiences you plan to seek to address each course objective.  Consider how each assignment may relate back to your current project concept.	Self-Assessed GCU DNP Domains and competencies	Actual Practice Immersion Hours Completed Associated with each Assignment.	Date Complete
Week 1: Pre-conference meeting	8 hours	02/23/2022	Objective: Review of course outline by learner and preceptor. Learner and Preceptor collaborate to discuss and practice immersion goals.	Effective communication.		04/13/2022
Individual success plan	3 hrs	02/23/2022	Professional role: Successful completion of core deliverables required for the program including: practice immersion hours, work relating to program competencies and Direct Practice Improvement project (Falls)	Critical thinking. Nursing practice.		04/13/2022
Identification of capstone change projects. Challenges:	3 hrs	02/23/2022	Assess and evaluate clinical problems and institutional policies that impact nursing practice. Valid research on evidence-based practices that addresses the clinical problem in question and how organizational or institutional policies affect nursing practice.  A comprehensive study of the clinical problem in review and their institutional policies.  Will analyze this clinical problem using the PICOT strategy.	Global awareness, perspectives and ethics Competencies: management of patient care in the changing society.		04/13/2022
Doctoral Strategies Essay and Attestation	3 hrs	02/23/2022	Entailed a reflection on the “Doctor of Nursing Orientation Webinar” , the doctoral dispositions and the resources introduced in the topic with an aim of preparing a plan to be a successful learner	Critical thinking and effective communication		04/13/2022
Topic 1 DQ 1	2 hrs	02/19/2022	Involves exploring how my future role as a Doctor of Nursing Practice lead will serve the profession and the community. Also entails what is expected to be achieved in this program	Responsible leadership		04/13/2022
Topic 1 DQ 2	2 hrs	02/21/2022	A discussion on self-care and strategies of recognizing signs of stress or imbalance as a DNP learner. Self care routines to be applied in achieving better balance	Critical thinking		04/13/2022
Scholarly writing using research	3 hrs	03/02/2022	The familiarization with the overall expectations of the scholarly writing and the tools necessary for success. Also entails a discussion on the difference between quality improvement and research and description of the patient practice problem at the practice site.	5.1: Apply analytic methods to critically appraise existing literature and other evidence to identify and implement health care best practices. 5.2:  Design and implement processes/strategies that evaluate outcomes of practice, practice patterns, and systems of care for an individual, aggregate, and populations against national benchmarks.  5.3:  Design, direct, and evaluate quality improvement methodologies to promote safe, timely, effective, efficient, equitable, and patient-centered care.  5.4:  Disseminate and apply relevant findings from evidence-based practice and research to enhance practice guidelines and enrich practice leading to improved healthcare outcomes.  5.5:  Employ information technology and research methods to appropriately manage data for the creation, evaluation, and application of evidence that leads to improved health care		04/13/2022
Topic 2 DQ 1	2 hrs	02/26/2022	Involves a description of the proposed practice site and the potential practice problem of interest. Explanations of why the topic is valid for the practice site and why it will contributed to the body of knowledge in the field is explored.	5.1: Apply analytic methods to critically appraise existing literature and other evidence to identify and implement health care best practices. 5.2:  Design and implement processes/strategies that evaluate outcomes of practice, practice patterns, and systems of care for an individual, aggregate, and populations against national benchmarks.  5.3: Design, direct, and evaluate quality improvement methodologies to promote safe, timely, effective, efficient, equitable, and patient-centered care.  5.4:  Disseminate and apply relevant findings from evidence-based practice and research to enhance practice guidelines and enrich practice leading to improved healthcare outcomes.  5.5:  Employ information technology and research methods to appropriately manage data for the creation, evaluation, and application of evidence that leads to improved health care		04/13/2022
Topic 2 DQ 2	2 hrs	02/28/2022	A reflection on scholarly writing using research paper and the standard of scholarly writing that are most challenging. In addition the tools and sites used in addressing the challenges and strategies to be used to improve proficiency are explored	Critical thinking and effective communication		04/13/2022
Selection of a practice problem	3 hrs	03/09/2022	The focus is to identify a valid patient practice problem at the practice site to be realistically addressed through a DPI project	5.1: Apply analytic methods to critically appraise existing literature and other evidence to identify and implement health care best practices. 5.2:  Design and implement processes/strategies that evaluate outcomes of practice, practice patterns, and systems of care for an individual, aggregate, and populations against national benchmarks.  5.3:  Design, direct, and evaluate quality improvement methodologies to promote safe, timely, effective, efficient, equitable, and patient-centered care.  5.4:  Disseminate and apply relevant findings from evidence-based practice and research to enhance practice guidelines and enrich practice leading to improved healthcare outcomes.  5.5:  Employ information technology and research methods to appropriately manage data for the creation, evaluation, and application of evidence that leads to improved health care		04/13/2022
Topic 3 DQ 1	2 hrs	03/05/2022	Entails finding two primary research article for the proposed patient practice problem and explaining why the articles are considered primary research articles and why the support the  proposed nursing practice problem	5.1: Apply analytic methods to critically appraise existing literature and other evidence to identify and implement health care best practices. 5.2:  Design and implement processes/strategies that evaluate outcomes of practice, practice patterns, and systems of care for an individual, aggregate, and populations against national benchmarks.  5.3:  Design, direct, and evaluate quality improvement methodologies to promote safe, timely, effective, efficient, equitable, and patient-centered care.  5.4:  Disseminate and apply relevant findings from evidence-based practice and research to enhance practice guidelines and enrich practice leading to improved healthcare outcomes.  5.5:  Employ information technology and research methods to appropriately manage data for the creation, evaluation, and application of evidence that leads to improved health care		04/13/2022
Topic 3 DQ 2	2 hrs	03/07/2022	Explanation of the difference between reference and citation and why using the citation and reference will help abode the consequences of plagiarizing.	Critical thinking and effective communication		04/13/2022
Topic 4 DQ 1	2 hrs	03/12/2022	Definition of critical thinking and why it is key to a learner proposing a quality improvement project in the practice site. Also entails a discussion of critical thinking skills needed for evaluating and interpreting primary quantitative research for a DPI project	Critical thinking
Topic 4 DQ 2	2 hrs	03/14/2022	A discussion on the difference between qualitative and quantitative research and why quantitative research articles are need for supporting the DPI project. Five primary quantitative research articles that offer support for the proposed intervention are to be obtained	5.1: Apply analytic methods to critically appraise existing literature and other evidence to identify and implement health care best practices. 5.2:  Design and implement processes/strategies that evaluate outcomes of practice, practice patterns, and systems of care for an individual, aggregate, and populations against national benchmarks.  5.3:  Design, direct, and evaluate quality improvement methodologies to promote safe, timely, effective, efficient, equitable, and patient-centered care.  5.4:  Disseminate and apply relevant findings from evidence-based practice and research to enhance practice guidelines and enrich practice leading to improved healthcare outcomes.  5.5:  Employ information technology and research methods to appropriately manage data for the creation, evaluation, and application of evidence that leads to improved health care.		04/13/2022
PICOT-D: Draft	3 hrs	03/23/2022	Entails development of the first draft of the PICOT-D for the proposed practice problem	5.1: Apply analytic methods to critically appraise existing literature and other evidence to identify and implement health care best practices. 5.2:  Design and implement processes/strategies that evaluate outcomes of practice, practice patterns, and systems of care for an individual, aggregate, and populations against national benchmarks.  5.3:  Design, direct, and evaluate quality improvement methodologies to promote safe, timely, effective, efficient, equitable, and patient-centered care.  5.4:  Disseminate and apply relevant findings from evidence-based practice and research to enhance practice guidelines and enrich practice leading to improved healthcare outcomes.  5.5:  Employ information technology and research methods to appropriately manage data for the creation, evaluation, and application of evidence that leads to improved health care.		04/13/2022
Topic 5 DQ 1	2 hrs	03/19/2022	Explanation of personal and research bias and why bias contributes to poor validity of research outcomes. Also entails exploration of how a quality improvement project can be affect the research applied is biased.	Critical thinking and effective communication		04/13/2022
Topic 5 DQ 2	2 hrs	03/21/2022	Explores the difference between clinical significance and statistical significance and how they may apply to the a quality improvement initiative	Critical thinking and effective communication
Literature search	3 hrs	03/30/2022	Entails an introduction to methods of critical thinking needed for searching, evaluating and organizing research articles that support the proposed PICOT-D question	5.1: Apply analytic methods to critically appraise existing literature and other evidence to identify and implement health care best practices. 5.2:  Design and implement processes/strategies that evaluate outcomes of practice, practice patterns, and systems of care for an individual, aggregate, and populations against national benchmarks.  5.3:  Design, direct, and evaluate quality improvement methodologies to promote safe, timely, effective, efficient, equitable, and patient-centered care.  5.4:  Disseminate and apply relevant findings from evidence-based practice and research to enhance practice guidelines and enrich practice leading to improved healthcare outcomes.  5.5:  Employ information technology and research methods to appropriately manage data for the creation, evaluation, and application of evidence that leads to improved health care.		04/13/2022
Topic 6 DQ 1	2 hrs	03/26/2022	Explores how a literature evaluation table helps in evaluating the quality of a primary quantitative research article to determine if it support the DPI project	5.1: Apply analytic methods to critically appraise existing literature and other evidence to identify and implement health care best practices. 5.2:  Design and implement processes/strategies that evaluate outcomes of practice, practice patterns, and systems of care for an individual, aggregate, and populations against national benchmarks.  5.3:  Design,direct, and evaluate quality improvement methodologies to promote safe, timely, effective, efficient, equitable, and patient-centered care.  5.4:  Disseminate and apply relevant findings from evidence-based practice and research to enhance practice guidelines and enrich practice leading to improved healthcare outcomes.  5.5:  Employ information technology and research methods to appropriately manage data for the creation, evaluation, and application of evidence that leads to improved health care.		04/13/2022
Topic 6 DQ 2	2 hrs	03/28/2022	Explanation of the process to be used in reviewing and incorporating instructors feedback on assignment	Effective communication and critical thinking		04/13/2022
Annotated bibliography	3 hrs	04/13/2022	Creation of an annotated bibliography to inform on the relevance of the selected articles and presenting the final primary quantitative research for the future DPI project.	5.1: Apply analytic methods to critically appraise existing literature and other evidence to identify and implement health care best practices. 5.2:  Design and implement processes/strategies that evaluate outcomes of practice, practice patterns, and systems of care for an individual, aggregate, and populations against national benchmarks.  5.3:  Design, direct, and evaluate quality improvement methodologies to promote safe, timely, effective, efficient, equitable, and patient-centered care.  5.4:  Disseminate and apply relevant findings from evidence-based practice and research to enhance practice guidelines and enrich practice leading to improved healthcare outcomes.  5.5:  Employ information technology and research methods to appropriately manage data for the creation, evaluation, and application of evidence that leads to improved health care.		04/13/2022
Topic 7 DQ 1	2 hrs	04/02/2022	Explores the principles that have created my world view	Critical thinking and Christian world view		04/13/2022
Topic 7 DQ 2	2 hrs	04/04/2022	A discussion on two principles of my personal worldview that are common with the GCU’s Christian worldview and how the common principles align with the vision and mission from the practice site.	Critical thinking and Christian world view
PICOT-D: Final Draft	3 hrs	04/13/2022	Entails submission of the final draft of the revised PICOT-D	Effective communication and critical thinking.		04/13/2022
Topic 8 DQ 1	2 hrs	04/09/2022	A reflection on the difference experiences of the course	Critical thinking and effective communication.		04/13/2022
Topic 8 DQ 2	2 hrs	04/11/2022	Explanation of why the chosen topic for the PICOT-D is feasible and what changes could be necessary to make it feasible if it is not			04/13/2022
Reflective journal entries.	3 hrs	04/13/2022	An integration of self-reflection and inquiry demonstrated in the current DNP course.	Critical thinking		04/13/2022