FPX 4010 Assessment 3: Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal
Capella University FPX 4010 Assessment 3: Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal-Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Capella University FPX 4010 Assessment 3: Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for FPX 4010 Assessment 3: Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Capella University FPX 4010 Assessment 3: Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for FPX 4010 Assessment 3: Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal
The introduction for the Capella University FPX 4010 Assessment 3: Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

Struggling to Meet Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on FPX 4010 Assessment 3: Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!
How to Write the Body for FPX 4010 Assessment 3: Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal
After the introduction, move into the main part of the FPX 4010 Assessment 3: Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for FPX 4010 Assessment 3: Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for FPX 4010 Assessment 3: Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the FPX 4010 Assessment 3: Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
FPX 4010 Assessment 3: Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal
FPX 4010 Assessment 3: Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal
Introduction
The healthcare system is a complex environment that requires collaboration and coordination among different departments to ensure that patients receive comprehensive and effective care. However, in many healthcare facilities, there is a lack of communication and coordination among departments, which can result in a fragmented approach to care and negatively impact patient outcomes (Nolan-Isles et al., 2021). This lack of collaboration and coordination can result in a duplication of efforts, which can be both time-consuming and costly, as well as causing confusion and frustration for patients who receive conflicting information from different departments.
The purpose of this plan proposal is to outline a strategy for improving communication and coordination among departments in a healthcare facility. The goal is to create an Interprofessional team that can collaborate and work towards driving improvements in this organizational issue, in order to deliver high-quality and patient-centered care.
Objectives
The objectives of this plan proposal are to:
- Identify and prioritize the key issues related to communication and coordination among departments in the healthcare facility.
- Develop and implement strategies for improving communication and coordination among departments, with a focus on Interprofessional collaboration.
- Monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of the strategies implemented to ensure that they are driving improvements in the organizational issue.
Identify and prioritize key issues:
To begin, a needs assessment will be conducted to identify and prioritize the key issues related to communication and coordination among departments in the healthcare facility. This will involve conducting interviews and focus groups with healthcare providers, patients, and other stakeholders, and reviewing relevant data and information. The results of the needs assessment will be used to identify areas for improvement and prioritize the key issues that need to be addressed.
Develop and implement strategies:
Based on the results of the needs assessment, strategies will be developed to improve communication and coordination among departments, with a focus on Interprofessional collaboration. These strategies may include:
- Regular Interprofessional meetings, where different departments can come together to discuss their approaches to care and develop a more unified treatment plan for patients. This can be done through the formation of a multidisciplinary team (MDT) that involves representatives from each relevant department. The MDT can meet regularly to discuss patient cases, provide input on the development of treatment plans, and ensure that all departments are working towards a common goal.
- The use of technology, such as electronic health records (EHR), to improve communication and coordination among departments. EHRs can provide a centralized platform for sharing patient information and tracking the progress of treatments and interventions (Ahmed et al., 2020). They can also allow healthcare providers to access important patient information from different departments, reducing the risk of duplicating efforts and improving the continuity of care.
- Education and training programs for healthcare providers on interprofessional collaboration and communication skills. This can involve providing training on the importance of collaboration, effective communication strategies, and best practices for interprofessional teamwork. Healthcare providers can also participate in simulations or role-playing exercises to practice applying these skills in real-life situations.
- Development of a shared decision-making model for patient care, to ensure that all departments are working towards a common goal. This model should involve collaboration and communication between healthcare providers from different departments, as well as with patients and their families, to ensure that all perspectives are considered in the development of treatment plans.
Monitor and evaluate effectiveness:
Having a dedicated team responsible for monitoring and evaluating the progress of the Interprofessional

collaboration initiatives will be crucial. This team will analyze the results of the feedback and data collected to determine if the strategies are achieving the desired results and making a positive impact on the healthcare facility and its patients. They can also identify any potential challenges or obstacles and work to address them in a timely manner. In order to sustain the improvements in communication and coordination, it will be important to integrate the strategies into the healthcare facility’s policies and procedures (Organization, 2020). This will ensure that the practices are sustained over time and become a standard way of providing patient care. In order to foster a culture of Interprofessional collaboration, it will be important to continue to educate and train healthcare providers on the benefits of working together and to provide ongoing support and resources. This may include regular workshops and training sessions, as well as opportunities for healthcare providers to collaborate and share best practices. By taking a comprehensive approach to improving communication and coordination among departments, the healthcare facility can ensure that patients receive high-quality, coordinated care. This will result in improved outcomes for patients, as well as increased satisfaction and improved collaboration among healthcare providers.
Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) will be established to track the progress and effectiveness of the strategies implemented. These KPIs may include metrics such as:
- Increased frequency and effectiveness of Interprofessional meetings.
- Increased use and utilization of EHRs for sharing patient information and tracking treatment progress.
- Improved communication and collaboration skills among healthcare providers, as measured through feedback from patients and staff.
- Increased satisfaction among patients and their families, as measured through patient surveys and focus groups.
- Improved continuity of care, as measured by a decrease in duplicated efforts and conflicting recommendations among departments.
Implementation and Timeline
The implementation of this Interprofessional collaboration plan will require the involvement of different departments and stakeholders in the healthcare facility, including healthcare providers, patients, and administrative staff. The timeline for implementation will be divided into several phases:
Phase 1 (3 months): Conducting needs assessment is an essential step in the process of developing an Interprofessional collaboration plan. This will help to identify and prioritize the key issues related to communication and coordination among departments in the healthcare facility and ensure that the initiatives implemented address the most pressing needs.
Phase 2 (6 months): Develop and implement strategies for improving communication and coordination among departments, including the formation of a multidisciplinary team, use of technology, education and training programs, and the development of a shared decision-making model for patient care.
Phase 3 (ongoing): Monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of the strategies implemented and make adjustments as needed to ensure that they continue to drive improvements in communication and coordination among departments.
FPX 4010 Assessment 3: Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal Conclusion:
Improving communication and coordination among departments in a healthcare facility is a complex and ongoing process that requires collaboration and teamwork. By creating an Interprofessional team and implementing strategies to improve communication and coordination, the healthcare facility can ensure that patients receive high-quality, patient-centered care. The monitoring and evaluation of the strategies implemented will ensure that the process of improvement remains ongoing and that the healthcare facility continues to make progress towards its goal of delivering effective and efficient care to its patients.
FPX 4010 Assessment 3: Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal References
Ahmed, Z., Mohamed, K., Zeeshan, S., & Dong, X. (2020). Artificial intelligence with multi-functional machine learning platform development for better healthcare and precision medicine. Database, 2020.
Nolan-Isles, D., Macniven, R., Hunter, K., Gwynn, J., Lincoln, M., Moir, R., Dimitropoulos, Y., Taylor, D., Agius, T., & Finlayson, H. (2021). Enablers and barriers to accessing healthcare services for Aboriginal people in New South Wales, Australia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(6), 3014.
Organization, W. H. (2020). WHO global strategy on health, environment and climate change: The transformation needed to improve lives and wellbeing sustainably through healthy environments.
FPX 4010 assessment 3
Question
For this assessment you will create a 2-4 page plan proposal for an interprofessional team to collaborate and work toward driving improvements in the organizational issue you identified in the second assessment.
The health care industry is always striving to improve patient outcomes and attain organizational goals. Nurses can play a critical role in achieving these goals; one way to encourage nurse participation in larger organizational efforts is to create a culture of ownership and shared responsibility (Berkow et al., 2012). Participation in interdisciplinary teams can also offer nurses opportunities to share their expertise and leadership skills, fostering a sense of ownership and collegiality.
Demonstration of Proficiency
Competency 1: Explain strategies for managing human and financial resources to promote organizational health.
Explain organizational resources, including a financial budget, needed for the plan to be a success and the impacts on those resources if nothing is done, related to the improvements sought by the plan.
Competency 2: Explain how interdisciplinary collaboration can be used to achieve desired patient and systems outcomes.
Describe an objective and predictions for an evidence-based interdisciplinary plan to achieve a specific objective related to improving patient or organizational outcomes.
Explain the collaboration needed by an interdisciplinary team to improve the likelihood of achieving the plan’s objective. Include best practices of interdisciplinary collaboration from the literature.
Competency 4: Explain how change management theories and leadership strategies can enable interdisciplinary teams to achieve specific organizational goals.
Explain a change theory and a leadership strategy, supported by relevant evidence, that are most likely to help an interdisciplinary team succeed in collaborating and implementing, or creating buy-in for, the project plan.
Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly, evidence-based communication strategies to impact patient, interdisciplinary team, and systems outcomes.
Communicate the interdisciplinary plan with writing that is clear, logically organized, and professional, with correct grammar and spelling, using current APA style.
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: FPX 4010 assessment 3
FPX 4010 Assessment 3: Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal Reference
Berkow, S., Workman, J., Aronson, S., Stewart, J., Virkstis, K., & Kahn, M. (2012). Strengthening frontline nurse investment in organizational goals. JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration, 42(3), 165–169.
Professional Context
This assessment will allow you to describe a plan proposal that includes an analysis of best practices of interprofessional collaboration, change theory, leadership strategies, and organizational resources with a financial budget that can be used to solve the problem identified through the interview you conducted in the prior assessment.
Scenario
Having reviewed the information gleaned from your professional interview and identified the issue, you will determine and present an objective for an interdisciplinary intervention to address the issue.
Note: You will not be expected to implement the plan during this course. However, the plan should be evidence-based and realistic within the context of the issue and your interviewee’s organization.
Instructions
For this assessment, use the context of the organization where you conducted your interview to develop a viable plan for an interdisciplinary team to address the issue you identified. Define a specific patient or organizational outcome or objective based on the information gathered in your interview.
The goal of this assessment is to clearly lay out the improvement objective for your planned interdisciplinary intervention of the issue you identified. Additionally, be sure to further build on the leadership, change, and collaboration research you completed in the previous assessment. Look for specific, real-world ways in which those strategies and best practices could be applied to encourage buy-in for the plan or facilitate the implementation of the plan for the best possible outcome.
Using the Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal Template [DOCX] will help you stay organized and concise. As you complete each section of the template, make sure you apply APA format to in-text citations for the evidence and best practices that inform your plan, as well as the reference list at the end.
Additionally, be sure that your plan addresses the following, which corresponds to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Please study the scoring guide carefully so you understand what is needed for a distinguished score.
Describe an objective and predictions for an evidence-based interdisciplinary plan to achieve a specific goal related to improving patient or organizational outcomes.
Explain a change theory and a leadership strategy, supported by relevant evidence, that is most likely to help an interdisciplinary team succeed in collaborating and implementing, or creating buy-in for, the project plan.
Explain the collaboration needed by an interdisciplinary team to improve the likelihood of achieving the plan’s objective. Include best practices of interdisciplinary collaboration from the literature.
Explain organizational resources, including a financial budget, needed for the plan to succeed and the impacts on those resources if the improvements described in the plan are not made.
Communicate the interdisciplinary plan, with writing that is clear, logically organized, and professional, with correct grammar and spelling, using current APA style.
Additional Requirements
Length of submission: Use the provided template. Remember that part of this assessment is to make the plan easy to understand and use, so it is critical that you are clear and concise. Most submissions will be 2 to 4 pages in length. Be sure to include a reference page at the end of the plan.
Number of references: Cite a minimum of 3 sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your central ideas. Resources should be no more than 5 years old.
APA formatting: Make sure that in-text citations and reference list follow current APA style.
Also Read: FPX 4010 assessment 2
- petency 5: Apply professional, scholarly, evidence-based communication strategies to impact patient, interdisciplinary team, and systems outcomes.
- Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling.
- Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references, exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format.
FPX 4010 Assessment 3: Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal Reference
Mulvale, G., Embrett, M., & Shaghayegh, D. R. (2016). ‘Gearing up’ to improve interprofessional collaboration in primary care: A systematic review and conceptual framework. BMC Family Practice, 17.
Professional Context
This assessment will allow you to describe a plan proposal that includes an analysis of best practices of interprofessional collaboration, change theory, leadership strategies, and organizational resources with a financial budget that can be used to solve the problem identified through the interview you conducted in the prior assessment.
Scenario
Having reviewed the information gleaned from your professional interview and identified the issue, you will determine and present an objective for an interdisciplinary intervention to address the issue.
Note: You will not be expected to implement the plan during this course. However, the plan should be evidence-based and realistic within the context of the issue and your interviewee’s organization.
Instructions
For this assessment, use the context of the organization where you conducted your interview to develop a viable plan for an interdisciplinary team to address the issue you identified. Define a specific patient or organizational outcome or objective based on the information gathered in your interview.
The goal of this assessment is to clearly lay out the improvement objective for your planned interdisciplinary intervention of the issue you identified. Additionally, be sure to further build on the leadership, change, and collaboration research you completed in the previous assessment. Look for specific, real-world ways in which those strategies and best practices could be applied to encourage buy-in for the plan or facilitate the implementation of the plan for the best possible outcome.
Using the Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal Template [DOCX] will help you stay organized and concise. As you complete each section of the template, make sure you apply APA format to in-text citations for the evidence and best practices that inform your plan, as well as the reference list at the end.
Additionally, be sure that your plan addresses the following, which corresponds to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Please study the scoring guide carefully so you understand what is needed for a distinguished score.
- Describe an objective and predictions for an evidence-based interdisciplinary plan to achieve a specific goal related to improving patient or organizational outcomes.
- Explain a change theory and a leadership strategy, supported by relevant evidence, that is most likely to help an interdisciplinary team succeed in collaborating and implementing, or creating buy-in for, the project plan.
- Explain the collaboration needed by an interdisciplinary team to improve the likelihood of achieving the plan’s objective. Include best practices of interdisciplinary collaboration from the literature.
- Explain organizational resources, including a financial budget, needed for the plan to succeed and the impacts on those resources if the improvements described in the plan are not made.
- Communicate the interdisciplinary plan, with writing that is clear, logically organized, and professional, with correct grammar and spelling, using current APA style.
Additional Requirements
- Length of submission: Use the provided template. Remember that part of this assessment is to make the plan easy to understand and use, so it is critical that you are clear and concise. Most submissions will be 2 to 4 pages in length. Be sure to include a reference page at the end of the plan.
- Number of references: Cite a minimum of 3 sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your central ideas. Resources should be no more than 5 years old.
- APA formatting: Make sure that in-text citations and reference list follow current APA style.
Note: Faculty may use the Writing Feedback Tool when grading this assessment. The Writing Feedback Tool is designed to provide you with guidance and resources to develop your writing based on five core skills. You will find writing feedback in the Scoring Guide for the assessment, once your work has been evaluated.
Portfolio Prompt: Remember to save the final assessment to your ePortfolio so that you may refer to it as you complete the final Capstone course.
FPX 4010 Assessment 3: Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal Scoring Guide
CRITERIA | NON-PERFORMANCE | BASIC | PROFICIENT | DISTINGUISHED |
---|---|---|---|---|
Describe an objective and predictions for an evidence-based interdisciplinary plan to achieve a specific goal related to improving patient or organizational outcomes. | Does not describe an objective and predictions for an evidence-based interdisciplinary plan to achieve a specific goal related to improving patient or organizational outcomes. | Identifies an objective for an evidence-based interdisciplinary plan but does not clearly explain how the objective will help achieve a specific goal related to improving patient or organizational outcomes. | Describes an objective and predictions for an evidence-based interdisciplinary plan to achieve a specific goal related to improving patient or organizational outcomes. | Describes an objective and predictions for an evidence-based interdisciplinary plan to achieve a specific goal related to improving patient or organizational outcomes, including methods from the literature that may be used to determine success. |
Explain a change theory and a leadership strategy, supported by relevant evidence, that is most likely to help an interdisciplinary team succeed in collaborating and implementing, or creating buy-in for, the project plan. | Does not explain a change theory and a leadership strategy, supported by relevant evidence, that is most likely to help an interdisciplinary team succeed in collaborating and implementing, or creating buy-in for, the project plan. | Describes a change theory and a leadership strategy but the relevance to the success of interdisciplinary team in collaborating and implementing, or creating buy-in for, the project plan is not clearly explained and no evidence is provided. | Explains a change theory and a leadership strategy, supported by relevant evidence, that is most likely to help an interdisciplinary team succeed in collaborating and implementing, or creating buy-in for, the project plan. | Explains a change theory and a leadership strategy, supported by relevant evidence, that is most likely to help an interdisciplinary team succeed in collaborating and implementing, or creating buy-in for, the project plan, providing real-world examples relevant to the health care organization that is the context for the plan. |
Explain the collaboration needed by an interdisciplinary team to improve the likelihood of achieving the plan’s objective, including best practices of interdisciplinary collaboration from the literature. | Does not explain the collaboration needed by an interdisciplinary team to improve the likelihood of achieving the plan’s objective. Does not cite best practices of interdisciplinary collaboration from the literature. | Explains collaboration but not in terms of an interdisciplinary team or does not include best practices from the literature. | Explains the collaboration needed by an interdisciplinary team to improve the likelihood of achieving the plan’s objective, including best practices of interdisciplinary collaboration from the literature. | Explains the collaboration needed by an interdisciplinary team to improve the likelihood of achieving the plan’s objective, including best practices of interdisciplinary collaboration from the literature. Provides real-world examples relevant to the health care organization that is the context for the plan. |
Explain organizational resources, including a financial budget, needed for the plan to succeed and the impacts on those resources if nothing is done to make the improvements sought by the plan. | Does not explain organizational resources, including a financial budget, needed for the plan to succeed and the impacts on those resources if nothing is done to make the improvements sought by the plan. | Identifies organizational resources needed for the plan to succeed and the impacts on those resources if nothing is done to make the improvements sought by the plan. Does not include a financial budget. | Explains organizational resources, including a financial budget, needed for the plan to succeed and the impacts on those resources if nothing is done to make the improvements sought by the plan. | Explains organizational resources, including a financial budget, needed for the plan to succeed and the impacts on those resources if nothing is done to make the improvements sought by the plan. Provides real-world examples relevant to the health care organization that is the context for the plan. |
Organize content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling. | Does not organize content for ideas. Lacks logical flow and smooth transitions. | Organizes content with some logical flow and smooth transitions. Contains errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling. | Organizes content so ideas flow logically with smooth transitions; contains few errors in grammar/punctuation, word choice, and spelling. | Organizes content with a clear purpose. Content flows logically with smooth transitions using coherent paragraphs, correct grammar/punctuation, word choice, and free of spelling errors. |
Apply APA formatting to in-text citations and references, exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format. | Does not apply APA formatting to headings, in-text citations, and references. Does not use quotes or paraphrase correctly. | Applies APA formatting to in-text citations, headings and references incorrectly and/or inconsistently, detracting noticeably from the content. Inconsistently uses headings, quotes and/or paraphrasing. | Applies APA formatting to in-text citations and references, exhibiting nearly flawless adherence to APA format. | Exhibits strict and flawless adherence to APA formatting of headings, in-text citations, and references. Quotes and paraphrases correc |
SAMPLE 2
Interdisciplinary Plan Proposal
Medical errors among new graduate nurses are a significant care quality issue since they hamper patient safety and job satisfaction among nursing staff. This plan proposes an interdisciplinary approach to address the problem through a comprehensive training program on appropriate medication administration procedures. The targeted outcome is to improve new graduate nurses’ medication administration skills to reduce medication errors and improve patient safety in the organization.
Objective
To train new graduate nurses on proper medication administration procedures using current technologies with the goal of preventing medical errors. This objective aligns with the broader organizational goal of creating safe environments for patients and healthcare providers capable of delivering high-quality care.
Questions and Predictions
- Is a training program the most effective intervention to prevent medical errors among new graduate nurses?
It is appropriate since it helps to reduce the skills gap and creates a more proficient workforce. For better outcomes, the training should focus on incapacity areas hampering nurses’ ability to administer medications appropriately.
- How much time is needed for the training program to be designed, implemented, and evaluated?
One month would be adequate for the design and implementation. The evaluation should be conducted after three months.
- Is there any significant barrier that could hamper the training?
Resource problems could be a major setback, but fortunately, the training program relies primarily on internal facilitation.
Change Theories and Leadership Strategies
Kurt Lewin’s change theory would be effective in developing an interdisciplinary solution for medical errors among new graduate nurses. According to Burnes (2020), Lewin’s change theory has three phases: unfreezing, changing, and refreezing. Unfreezing involves the discernment that change is vital, followed by movement to the desired direction (changing), while refreezing involves adopting measures to solidify new behaviors. Guided by this theory, the interdisciplinary team would first acknowledge the problem requiring teamwork to solve. Next, the team would implement the training program together by sharing diverse skills and values to enable nurses to enable new graduate nurses to administer medications properly (changing). Behavior solidification can be achieved through mandatory yearly training for nurses on medication procedures and workplace cultures. New nurses should also undergo mandatory orientation training to ensure they are conversant with procedures and workplace culture.
Leadership strategies affect how a team works and overall output. The transformational leadership approach would help the team to develop an interdisciplinary solution to medical errors. Its foundation principle is a shared vision, which the team requires for inspiration to achieve a common goal (Asif et al., 2019). Team leaders should also foster respectful interactions among team members. Mutual respect enhances interdisciplinary cooperation since team members feel appreciated and valued, which encourages them to express themselves confidently (Noyes, 2022). This cohesion is vital for a team comprising diverse members from different disciplines.
Team Collaboration Strategy
- The organization’s manager will facilitate the material and financial resources needed for the training program.
- Nurse leaders will organize new graduate nurses and prepare them for the training.
- Internal and external trainers will show new graduate nurses how to verify medications before administration using barcode scanning and similar technologies.
- Program analysts will guide trainers and nurse leaders on implementation and evaluation essentials.
- Departmental leaders will organize regular group meetings for the interdisciplinary team to review progress, challenges, and crucial improvement areas.
Clear roles and responsibilities promote collaboration by reducing the possibility of conflicts. Besides, delegating roles is crucial for interdependence and requires team members to interact regularly and update each other on the progress (Lisak et al., 2022). Regular team meetings organized by departmental leaders and other opportunities for progress reviews can make an interdisciplinary team more cohesive. Team meetings allow members to share professional goals, concerns, and aspirations.
Required Organizational Resources
The success of the training depends on the availability of various human, financial, and material resources. Internal staff includes the managers, departmental leaders, program analysts, and nurse leaders. An external trainer can also be integrated into the team, particularly for training the nurses on the ethical and safe use of technologies. Some nurses can also volunteer to distribute materials and other simple tasks. A computer, training halls, projector, handouts, brochures, and writing materials are vital for an effective presentation/training. Since most materials are available in the facility, the projected cost is $650 for the materials. Trainers’ remuneration will be approximately $400 for four sessions. Therefore, the overall training will cost about $1,050. It is hoped that the training will be successful since the persistence of medication errors implies a loss of the resources used to conduct the training. Furthermore, medication costs have huge cost implications since they increase patient injuries, health complications, and hospitalizations. A successful program would save the organization all these costs.
Conclusion
New nurses join the practice looking forward to providing high-quality care. However, new graduate nurses may lack an appropriate transition from education into practice. Medical errors are a common problem experienced by new graduate nurses. An interdisciplinary team approach can help to solve the problem by bringing team members with diverse skills, values, and perspectives to design, implement, and evaluate a training program on proper medication administration for new graduate nurses.

Don’t wait until the last minute
Fill in your requirements and let our experts deliver your work asap.