PHI 413V Week 5 Topic 5 Discussion 2

Grand Canyon University PHI 413V Week 5 Topic 5 Discussion 2-Step-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Grand Canyon University PHI 413V Week 5 Topic 5 Discussion 2 assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for PHI 413V Week 5 Topic 5 Discussion 2                       

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Grand Canyon University PHI 413V Week 5 Topic 5 Discussion 2 depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for PHI 413V Week 5 Topic 5 Discussion 2                       

The introduction for the Grand Canyon University PHI 413V Week 5 Topic 5 Discussion 2 is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

How to Write the Body for PHI 413V Week 5 Topic 5 Discussion 2                       

After the introduction, move into the main part of the PHI 413V Week 5 Topic 5 Discussion 2  assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for PHI 413V Week 5 Topic 5 Discussion 2                       

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for PHI 413V Week 5 Topic 5 Discussion 2                       

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the PHI 413V Week 5 Topic 5 Discussion 2 assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

Sample Answer for PHI 413V Week 5 Topic 5 Discussion 2 Included After Question

When it comes to facilitating spiritual care for patients with worldviews different from yours, what are your strengths and weaknesses? If you were the patient, who would have the final say in terms of ethical decision-making and intervention in the event of a difficult situation?

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: PHI 413V Week 5 Topic 5 Discussion 2

Title: PHI 413V Week 5 Topic 5 Discussion 2

In the healthcare industry, patients with certain religious beliefs often find themselves caught in a dilemma when they try to balance their faith with their health concerns. Recently, I encountered a patient who faced an ethical dilemma related to their religion. The patient was a Jehovah’s Witness, and their faith prohibits them from receiving blood transfusions. This belief stems from a scriptural passage that forbids the consumption of blood. The patient had severely low hemoglobin levels and required a severe surgical operation to fix their medical problem. However, the patient refused the transfusion due to their beliefs.

As a nurse, I respect patients’ wishes but struggle with allowing them to suffer. Blood transfusion is a standard procedure that can save a patient’s life. Still, I realized that for some patients, receiving blood transfusions can be a difficult decision due to their religious beliefs. In such cases, medical professionals must respect patients’ autonomy and religious beliefs while considering their health and well-being.

In conclusion, medical professionals must understand and respect their patients’ religious beliefs while providing the best healthcare treatment. Maintaining open communication with patients and their families is essential to ensure that their religious beliefs are considered while providing medical care.

Reference :

Evans, Keith.2022). Practicing Dignity: An Introduction Values and Decision Making: Intervention, Ethical Decision Making, and Spiritual Care. Grand Canyon University.

A Sample Answer 2 For the Assignment: PHI 413V Week 5 Topic 5 Discussion 2

Title: PHI 413V Week 5 Topic 5 Discussion 2

Supporting a patient facing an ethical dilemma requires me as a nurse, to provide sensitive and thoughtful spiritual care, considering the patient’s worldview, beliefs, and values. Patients encounter complex and emotionally challenging ethical dilemmas in healthcare. The choices and perspectives they adopt in making healthcare decisions are significantly shaped by their individual worldview. This worldview, comprising values, beliefs, experiences, culture, and adherence to societal norms, moral codes, and religious practices plays a crucial role in guiding patients through their healthcare journey (Evans, 2022). By actively listening to the patient’s concerns, fears, and values, I would be able to assess their worldview and spiritual beliefs to gain a comprehensive understanding of the factors influencing their ethical dilemma. Supporting patients in their chosen interventions and addressing their spiritual needs is paramount in alleviating feelings of reluctance and apprehension. Understanding that a person’s worldview significantly influences healthcare decisions, particularly in intricate and vague ethical dilemmas, emphasizes the importance of providing holistic support. I would let my patient know that they have a safe space to express themselves openly without fear of judgment. Ensuring my patient feels supported is a top priority. Conducting a spiritual assessment can aid the patient in identifying and comprehending their specific needs. Such as utilizing the Religious Struggle Screening Protocol” (RSSP) which was formulated to aid healthcare professionals who are not chaplains in identifying patients requiring spiritual care (Nissen et al., 2021). As emphasized by Green (2021), nurses should consistently demonstrate care, comfort, and compassion towards their patients. Advocacy for patient rights is crucial, and I am committed to ensuring that these rights are upheld. In navigating these challenges, healthcare professionals can extend assistance by facilitating contact with individuals in the patient’s religious communities, engaging in active listening, and providing support. These considerations contribute to a comprehensive approach to spiritual care, acknowledging and respecting the diverse dimensions of a patient’s worldview.

References

Evans, K. (2022). Intervention, ethical decision-making, and spiritual care. In Grand Canyon University (Ed.), Practicing dignity: An introduction to Christian values and decision making in health care (Second Edition). https://bibliu.com/app/#/view/books/1000000000591/epub/Chapter5.html

Green, C. (2021). Assessing Spiritual Health through the Use of Spiritual Health Assessment Tools: Indications for End-of-Life Care. International Journal of Health, Wellness & Society, 11(1), 189–197. https://doi-org.lopes.idm.oclc.org/10.18848/2156-8960/CGP/v11i01/189-197

Nissen, R. D., Viftrup, D. T., & Hvidt, N. C. (2021). The process of spiritual care. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 674453.

Assignment Submissions

University Policy

All assignments are due before midnight Arizona time on the due dates indicated. Assignments posted after the indicated due dates will be subject to a deduction of 10% of the available points for each day late. No assignment can be accepted for grading after midnight on the final day of class. Technical issues are not valid excuses for late work unless the problem stems from THE UNIVERSITY servers.

• It is the student’s responsibility to ensure the assignment is a “final submit.”
• All assignments in this course must be handed in as only 1 (one) file. The system will pull the assignment last assignment posted to the drop box for grading. If you have multiple files, only the last uploaded will be graded.
• Only assignments submitted to the drop box will be graded. No grading will be provided to students who email professor assignments without submitting them to drop box. Please ensure you have allowed yourself enough time before the midnight deadline to upload to the drop box as the time stamp from the upload is the time it was submitted.
• For the PowerPoint presentations, please ensure you are using an essential background as to the size of some designer backgrounds, which creates problems with the upload to Halo. This assignment must be turned in as a PowerPoint and processed through LopesWrite. Any other submission form will not be graded, and the student will receive zero credit.
• PowerPoint presentations MUST be submitted to LopesWrite. Links to presentations will not be graded as they cannot be submitted for similarity assessments.
• As a student, you can review LopesWrite before your final submission. Please reach out to tech services if you are unsure of this process.
• When the APA Checklist is required to be placed in submission per formatting guidelines of the APA Manual 7th edition, it is expected the appendix in the submission will significantly increase LopesWrite’s score.
• According to the rubric, word count is only wording in the body of the submission. It does not include a cover page, running head, references any required appendices.
• All references in the course must have a date and be within the past five years unless it is a primary source, such as the original theory written.

Grading of Assignment Submissions:

At the university, Faculty is allowed seven days for grading of assignments. If you have not received a grade in that time, please let me know if there was a problem with the grade upload to Halo.