DNP 801 Week 6 Literature Search GCU
Grand Canyon University DNP 801 Week 6 Literature Search GCU-Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Grand Canyon University DNP 801 Week 6 Literature Search GCU assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for DNP 801 Week 6 Literature Search GCU
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Grand Canyon University DNP 801 Week 6 Literature Search GCU depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for DNP 801 Week 6 Literature Search GCU
The introduction for the Grand Canyon University DNP 801 Week 6 Literature Search GCU is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
Struggling to Meet Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on DNP 801 Week 6 Literature Search GCU done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!
How to Write the Body for DNP 801 Week 6 Literature Search GCU
After the introduction, move into the main part of the DNP 801 Week 6 Literature Search GCU assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for DNP 801 Week 6 Literature Search GCU
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for DNP 801 Week 6 Literature Search GCU
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the DNP 801 Week 6 Literature Search GCU assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
Sample Answer for DNP 801 Week 6 Literature Search GCU Included After Question
The purpose of this assignment is to introduce the method of critical thinking required for searching, evaluating, and organizing research articles to support your proposed PICOT-D question.
General Requirements:
• Utilize the attached “Literature Evaluation Table” to complete this assignment.
• Use the “Levels of Evidence in Research” chart, located in Class Resources, to assist in completing the assignment.
• Use the “Searching Nursing Databases,” located on the Doctor of Nursing Practice page in the GCU Library, to assist in completing the assignment.
• A minimum of five primary quantitative research articles, published within 5 years of your anticipated graduation date, are required to complete this assignment.
• Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
• This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
• You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.
Directions:
For this assignment, you will search for and evaluate literature to identify supporting evidence for your proposed PICOT-D question from your “PICOT-D Question Template.” Complete the following:
1. Review the “Levels of Evidence in Research” chart and the “Literature Evaluation Table” document prior to beginning this assignment. Refer to the criteria on these respective documents for identifying and evaluating acceptable research for your future DPI Project.
2. Conduct a search in the GCU Library using the nursing databases and find a minimum of five primary quantitative research articles to support your PICOT-D question. Two must provide direct support for your proposed intervention. You may use research articles from your previous assignments if the articles meet the specified criteria for this assignment.
3. Use the “Literature Evaluation Table” to evaluate the quality of the primary quantitative research articles you selected for PICOT-D question. As you evaluate the selected articles, remove and replace any articles that fail to meet the criteria on the table.
4. If your intervention is a clinical practice guideline, or is coming from a clinical practice guideline, identify your clinical practice guideline in Table 3 of the “Literature Evaluation Table” and include the primary quantitative research from the clinical practice guideline in Table 1 (PICOT-D Question) or Table 2 (Intervention).
5. Once you have five primary quantitative research articles identified, submit the “Literature Evaluation Table.”
Attachments
DNP-801A-RS6-LiteratureEvaluationT
Literature Search – Rubric
Collapse All Literature Search – RubricCollapse All
PICOT-D Question
11 points
Criteria Description
PICOT-D Question
5. Target
11 points
The PICOT-D question is accurately presented.
4. Acceptable
10.12 points
NA
3. Approaching
9.68 points
The PICOT-D question is presented, but there are minor errors.
2. Insufficient
8.8 points
The PICOT-D question is presented, but there are errors and inaccuracies throughout.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
The PICOT-D question is omitted.
APA References for Research Articles
11 points
Criteria Description
APA style; includes the GCU permalink or working link used to access the article.
5. Target
11 points
APA style is used in the reference formatting. There are no errors. The links provide access to the articles.
4. Acceptable
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: DNP 801 Week 6 Literature Search GCU
10.12 points
APA style is used in the reference formatting. There minor errors. The links provide access to the articles.
3. Approaching
9.68 points
APA style is used in the reference formatting, but there some errors and inaccuracies. The links provide access to the articles.
2. Insufficient
8.8 points
APA style is used in the reference formatting, but there are major errors or omissions. One or two links do not provide access to the articles.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
APA style is not used in the reference formatting. Multiple links are missing or do not work.
Identification and Evaluation of Primary Quantitative Research for PICOT-D Question and Intervention
82.5 points
Criteria Description
Articles meet criteria required for primary quantitative research supporting the PICOT-D question and intervention. Articles are evaluated using criteria in the literature evaluation table. Includes primary quantitative research from clinical practice guidelines, if applicable. If applicable, clinical practice guidelines are addressed in Table 2.
5. Target
82.5 points
All five articles, including articles from the clinical practice guidelines, if applicable, meet the criteria required for a primary quantitative research article. The evaluation of each article is concise, informative, and accurate. How each article and applicable clinical practice guidelines support the proposed the PICOT-D question or intervention is clearly explained. At least two articles provide direct support for the intervention.
4. Acceptable
75.9 points
All five articles, including articles from the clinical practice guidelines, if applicable, meet the criteria required for a primary quantitative research article. The evaluation of each article is complete, but there are some minor errors or inaccuracies. How each article and applicable clinical practice guidelines support the proposed the PICOT-D question or intervention is adequately explained. At least two articles provide adequate support for the intervention. Some detail is needed for accuracy or clarity.
3. Approaching
72.6 points
Four articles, including articles from the clinical practice guidelines, if applicable, meet the criteria required for a primary research article. The evaluation of each of the four articles is complete, but a few key aspects are inaccurate or incorrect. General explanations for how each article and applicable clinical practice guidelines support the PICOT-D question or intervention are presented. Only one article provides sufficient support for the intervention.
2. Insufficient
66 points
Three articles, including articles from the clinical practice guidelines, if applicable, meet the criteria required for a primary research article. The evaluation of the articles contains numerous inaccuracies. It is unclear how the research articles, and clinical practice guidelines support the intervention.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Only two articles meet the criteria required for a primary research article. The evaluation of each of the four articles is incomplete. Clinical guidelines are used, but the primary quantitative research is omitted.
Mechanics of Writing
5.5 points
Criteria Description
Includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use.
5. Target
5.5 points
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
4. Acceptable
5.06 points
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.
3. Approaching
4.84 points
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.
2. Insufficient
4.4 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct, but not varied.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.
Total 110 points
Reflective Learning, Reflective Practice
Read:
Jacobs, S. (2016). Reflective learning, reflective practice. Nursing, 46(5), 62-64.
… Read More
Why Do We Read Many Articles With Bad Statistics?: What Does the New American Statistical Association’s Statement on P-Values Mean?
Read:
Sangseok, L. (2016). Why do we read many articles with bad statistics?: What does the new American Statistical Association’s
… Read More
Word: Track Changes and Comments
View:
GCFLearnFree.org. (2016, February 8). Word: Track changes and comments. [Video]. YouTube.
Literature Search – Rubric
Collapse All Literature Search – RubricCollapse All
PICOT-D Question
11 points
Criteria Description
PICOT-D Question
- Target
11 points
The PICOT-D question is accurately presented.
- Acceptable
10.12 points
NA
- Approaching
9.68 points
The PICOT-D question is presented, but there are minor errors.
- Insufficient
8.8 points
The PICOT-D question is presented, but there are errors and inaccuracies throughout.
- Unsatisfactory
0 points
The PICOT-D question is omitted.
APA References for Research Articles
11 points
Criteria Description
APA style; includes the GCU permalink or working link used to access the article.
- Target
11 points
APA style is used in the reference formatting. There are no errors. The links provide access to the articles.
- Acceptable
10.12 points
APA style is used in the reference formatting. There minor errors. The links provide access to the articles.
- Approaching
9.68 points
APA style is used in the reference formatting, but there some errors and inaccuracies. The links provide access to the articles.
- Insufficient
8.8 points
APA style is used in the reference formatting, but there are major errors or omissions. One or two links do not provide access to the articles.
- Unsatisfactory
0 points
APA style is not used in the reference formatting. Multiple links are missing or do not work.
Identification and Evaluation of Primary Quantitative Research for PICOT-D Question and Intervention
82.5 points
Criteria Description
Articles meet criteria required for primary quantitative research supporting the PICOT-D question and intervention. Articles are evaluated using criteria in the literature evaluation table. Includes primary quantitative research from clinical practice guidelines, if applicable. If applicable, clinical practice guidelines are addressed in Table 2.
- Target
82.5 points
All five articles, including articles from the clinical practice guidelines, if applicable, meet the criteria required for a primary quantitative research article. The evaluation of each article is concise, informative, and accurate. How each article and applicable clinical practice guidelines support the proposed the PICOT-D question or intervention is clearly explained. At least two articles provide direct support for the intervention.
- Acceptable
75.9 points
All five articles, including articles from the clinical practice guidelines, if applicable, meet the criteria required for a primary quantitative research article. The evaluation of each article is complete, but there are some minor errors or inaccuracies. How each article and applicable clinical practice guidelines support the proposed the PICOT-D question or intervention is adequately explained. At least two articles provide adequate support for the intervention. Some detail is needed for accuracy or clarity.
- Approaching
72.6 points
Four articles, including articles from the clinical practice guidelines, if applicable, meet the criteria required for a primary research article. The evaluation of each of the four articles is complete, but a few key aspects are inaccurate or incorrect. General explanations for how each article and applicable clinical practice guidelines support the PICOT-D question or intervention are presented. Only one article provides sufficient support for the intervention.
- Insufficient
66 points
Three articles, including articles from the clinical practice guidelines, if applicable, meet the criteria required for a primary research article. The evaluation of the articles contains numerous inaccuracies. It is unclear how the research articles, and clinical practice guidelines support the intervention.
- Unsatisfactory
0 points
Only two articles meet the criteria required for a primary research article. The evaluation of each of the four articles is incomplete. Clinical guidelines are used, but the primary quantitative research is omitted.
Mechanics of Writing
5.5 points
Criteria Description
Includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use.
- Target
5.5 points
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
- Acceptable
5.06 points
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.
- Approaching
4.84 points
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.
- Insufficient
4.4 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct, but not varied.
- Unsatisfactory
0 points
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.
Don’t wait until the last minute
Fill in your requirements and let our experts deliver your work asap.