DNP 801 Topic 8 Reflective Journal GCU

Grand Canyon University DNP 801 Topic 8 Reflective Journal GCU-Step-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Grand Canyon University DNP 801 Topic 8 Reflective Journal GCU assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for DNP 801 Topic 8 Reflective Journal GCU                       

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Grand Canyon University DNP 801 Topic 8 Reflective Journal GCU depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for DNP 801 Topic 8 Reflective Journal GCU                       

The introduction for the Grand Canyon University DNP 801 Topic 8 Reflective Journal GCU is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

How to Write the Body for DNP 801 Topic 8 Reflective Journal GCU                       

After the introduction, move into the main part of the DNP 801 Topic 8 Reflective Journal GCU  assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for DNP 801 Topic 8 Reflective Journal GCU                       

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for DNP 801 Topic 8 Reflective Journal GCU                       

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the DNP 801 Topic 8 Reflective Journal GCU assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

Sample Answer for DNP 801 Topic 8 Reflective Journal GCU Included After Question

Learners must maintain a reflective journal integrating self-reflection and inquiry demonstrated in the current Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) course.

General Requirements:

Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:
• Download the “Reflective Journal Template,” located in the DNP PI Workspace, for submission. Directions provided in the template should be followed because they align to the assignment rubric.
• A minimum of three peer-reviewed references published within the last 5 years is required.
• Doctoral learners are required to use the current APA style for their essay writing assignments. The current APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
• This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric before beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
• You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
• Learners will submit this assignment using the assignment dropbox in the digital classroom. In addition, learners must upload this deliverable to the Learner Dissertation Page (LDP) in the DNP PI Workspace for later use. Failure to submit the reflective journal to both locations can result in an Incomplete for the course.

Directions:

Using a scholarly approach, maintain a reflective journal integrating self-reflection and inquiry demonstrated in the current DNP course.
Topic 8 Reflective Journal – Rubric
Collapse All Topic 8 Reflective Journal – RubricCollapse All
Professional Practice and Approach
4 points
Criteria Description
Professional Practice and Approach
5. Excellent
4 points
A cogent, scholarly discussion of discoveries by the learner about professional practice and approach is clearly explained, with relevant details and support.
4. Good
3.68 points
A detailed discussion of discoveries by the learner about professional practice and approach is complete, with appropriate details and support.
3. Satisfactory
3.52 points
An introductory discussion of discoveries by the learner about professional practice is included, but only minimal detail or support is provided for approach.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
3.2 points
A discussion of discoveries by the learner about professional practice and approach is incomplete or limited.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
A discussion of discoveries by the learner about professional practice and approach is not included.
Personal Knowledge and Skills
4 points
Criteria Description
Personal Knowledge and Skills
5. Excellent
4 points
A reflection on the personal knowledge and skills gained in the course, including examples of accomplishments or challenges, that addresses at least three health care related topics is thoroughly explored and clearly explained with relevant details and support.
4. Good
3.68 points
A reflection on the personal knowledge and skills gained in the course, including examples of accomplishments or challenges, that addresses at least three health care related topics is provided with appropriate details and support.
3. Satisfactory
3.52 points
A reflection on the personal knowledge and skills gained in the course, including examples of accomplishments or challenges, that addresses at least three health care related topics is provided, but with minimal detail or support.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
3.2 points
A reflection on the personal knowledge and skills gained in the course, including examples of accomplishments or challenges, that addresses at least three health care related topics is incomplete or otherwise deficient.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
A reflection on the personal knowledge and skills gained in the course, including examples of accomplishments or challenges, that addresses at least three health care related topics is not included.
Additional Resources for Influencing Optimal Learning Outcomes
4 points
Criteria Description
Additional Resources for Influencing Optimal Learning Outcomes
5. Excellent
4 points
A clear discussion of additional resources for influencing optimal learning outcomes is provided, with relevant details and support.
4. Good
3.68 points
A complete discussion of additional resources for influencing optimal learning outcomes is provided with appropriate details and support.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: DNP 801 Topic 8 Reflective Journal GCU 

3. Satisfactory
3.52 points
An introductory discussion of additional resources for influencing optimal learning outcomes is provided, but with minimal detail or support.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
3.2 points
A discussion of additional resources for influencing optimal learning outcomes is incomplete or otherwise deficient.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
A discussion of additional resources for influencing optimal learning outcomes is not included.
Course Outcomes and Competencies Aligned to the Course
4 points
Criteria Description
Course Outcomes and Competencies Aligned to the Course
5. Excellent
4 points
A cogent, scholarly description of how the learner achieved course outcomes and met the competencies aligned to the course is thoroughly explored and clearly explained with relevant details and support.
4. Good
3.68 points
A complete description of how the learner achieved course outcomes and met the competencies aligned to the course is provided with appropriate details and support.
3. Satisfactory
3.52 points
An introductory description of how the learner achieved course outcomes and met the competencies aligned to the course is provided with minimal detail or support.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
3.2 points
A description of how the learner achieved course outcomes and met the competencies aligned to the course is incomplete or otherwise deficient.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
A description of how the learner achieved course outcomes and met the competencies aligned to the course is not included.

Thesis Development and Purpose
1 points
Criteria Description
Thesis Development and Purpose
5. Excellent
1 points
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
4. Good
0.92 points
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
3. Satisfactory
0.88 points
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
0.8 points
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
1 points
Criteria Description
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
5. Excellent
1 points
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
4. Good
0.92 points
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.
3. Satisfactory
0.88 points
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
0.8 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.
Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
1 points
Criteria Description
Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
5. Excellent
1 points
All format elements are correct.
4. Good
0.92 points
Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
3. Satisfactory
0.88 points
Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
0.8 points
Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.
Documentation of Sources
1 points
Criteria Description
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)
5. Excellent
1 points
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
4. Good
0.92 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.
3. Satisfactory
0.88 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
0.8 points
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Sources are not documented.
Total 20 points

A reflection on the personal knowledge and skills gained in the course, including examples of accomplishments or challenges, that addresses at least three health care related topics is not included.

Additional Resources for Influencing Optimal Learning Outcomes

4 points

Criteria Description

Additional Resources for Influencing Optimal Learning Outcomes

5. Excellent

4 points

A clear discussion of additional resources for influencing optimal learning outcomes is provided, with relevant details and support.

4. Good

3.68 points

A complete discussion of additional resources for influencing optimal learning outcomes is provided with appropriate details and support.

3. Satisfactory

3.52 points

An introductory discussion of additional resources for influencing optimal learning outcomes is provided, but with minimal detail or support.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

3.2 points

A discussion of additional resources for influencing optimal learning outcomes is incomplete or otherwise deficient.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

A discussion of additional resources for influencing optimal learning outcomes is not included.

Course Outcomes and Competencies Aligned to the Course

4 points

Criteria Description

Course Outcomes and Competencies Aligned to the Course

5. Excellent

4 points

A cogent, scholarly description of how the learner achieved course outcomes and met the competencies aligned to the course is thoroughly explored and clearly explained with relevant details and support.

4. Good

3.68 points

A complete description of how the learner achieved course outcomes and met the competencies aligned to the course is provided with appropriate details and support.

3. Satisfactory

3.52 points

An introductory description of how the learner achieved course outcomes and met the competencies aligned to the course is provided with minimal detail or support.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

3.2 points

A description of how the learner achieved course outcomes and met the competencies aligned to the course is incomplete or otherwise deficient.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

A description of how the learner achieved course outcomes and met the competencies aligned to the course is not included.

Thesis Development and Purpose

1 points

Criteria Description

Thesis Development and Purpose

5. Excellent

1 points

Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

4. Good

0.92 points

Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

3. Satisfactory

0.88 points

Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

0.8 points

Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

1 points

Criteria Description

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

5. Excellent

1 points

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

4. Good

0.92 points

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

3. Satisfactory

0.88 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

0.8 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.

Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

1 points

Criteria Description

Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

5. Excellent

1 points

All format elements are correct.

4. Good

0.92 points

Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

3. Satisfactory

0.88 points

Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

0.8 points

Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

Documentation of Sources

1 points

Criteria Description

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

5. Excellent

1 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

4. Good

0.92 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

3. Satisfactory

0.88 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

0.8 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Sources are not documented.