DNP 801 Topic 8 PICOT-D Final Draft GCU

Grand Canyon University DNP 801 Topic 8 PICOT-D Final Draft GCU-Step-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Grand Canyon University DNP 801 Topic 8 PICOT-D Final Draft GCU assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for DNP 801 Topic 8 PICOT-D Final Draft GCU                       

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Grand Canyon University DNP 801 Topic 8 PICOT-D Final Draft GCU depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for DNP 801 Topic 8 PICOT-D Final Draft GCU                       

The introduction for the Grand Canyon University DNP 801 Topic 8 PICOT-D Final Draft GCU is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

How to Write the Body for DNP 801 Topic 8 PICOT-D Final Draft GCU                       

After the introduction, move into the main part of the DNP 801 Topic 8 PICOT-D Final Draft GCU  assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for DNP 801 Topic 8 PICOT-D Final Draft GCU                       

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for DNP 801 Topic 8 PICOT-D Final Draft GCU                       

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the DNP 801 Topic 8 PICOT-D Final Draft GCU assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

Sample Answer for DNP 801 Topic 8 PICOT-D Final Draft GCU Included After Question

The purpose of this assignment is to submit a final draft of your revised PICOT-D using the feedback from your instructor.
Make sure you have identified and incorporated all feedback from your instructor from your “PICOT-D Draft” assignment. In addition, list the primary quantitative research in APA format as indicated and include a working link for each article. Remember, at least two of the articles must support your proposed intervention.

General Requirements:

• Refer to the “PICOT-D Selection Guidelines,” located in the DC Network, for assistance in completing this assignment.
• Use the “PICOT-D Question Template,” located in the DC Network, to complete this assignment.
• A minimum of five primary quantitative research articles, published within 5 years of your anticipated graduation date, are required to complete this assignment.
• While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
• This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
• You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.
• Learners will submit this assignment using the assignment dropbox in the digital classroom. In addition, learners must upload this deliverable to the Learner Dissertation Page (LDP) in the DNP PI Workspace for later use.

Directions:

Learners are required to submit the final draft of their PICOT-D to the instructor and the college reviewers. Please read the instructions carefully as there are a series of steps.
Step 1: Revise your PICOT-D using instructor feedback you received in Topics 6 and 7.
Step 2: Save your PICOT-D document by labeling it accordingly: Learner’s last name, first name, course number, PICOT-D, and date (e.g., Sally.DNP801A.PICOTD.03.06.2021)
Step 3: Submit a copy of the PICOT-D to your instructor using the dropbox in the digital classroom.
Step 4: Submit a copy of the PICOT-D to the college reviewers using these steps:
1. Submit to the college through this email address: [email protected]
2. Use your my.gcu.edu email only.
3. Copy (CC) your current course faculty on the email.
4. In the subject line of your email, list the course number and your name (e.g., DNP-801A, Sally Black).
5. PICOT-D: Final Draft – Rubric
6. Collapse All PICOT-D: Final Draft – RubricCollapse All
7. Population
8. 2.3 points
9. Criteria Description
10. Revision is incorporated. Patient population is appropriate.
11. 5. Target
12. 2.3 points
13. Revision is evident or was not required. All errors have been corrected and feedback has been accurately incorporated for the Population criteria. A description of an appropriate patient population being assessed can be linked to direct practice improvements and is extremely thorough with substantial supporting evidence.
14. 4. Acceptable
15. 2.12 points
16. NA
17. 3. Approaching
18. 2.02 points
19. Revision is generally evident. Feedback has been incorporated, but there are still some errors and inaccuracies. A description of an appropriate patient population being assessed is included but lacks a link to direct practice improvements that could be measured through patient and practice outcomes.
20. 2. Insufficient
21. 1.84 points
22. NA
23. 1. Unsatisfactory
24. 0 points
25. The population is not appropriate for the PICOT-D. Revisions were made but did not correct or improve errors and inaccuracies.
26. Intervention
27. 23 points
28. Criteria Description
29. Revision is incorporated. Evidence-based intervention is directly supported by primary quantitative research articles.
30. 5. Target
31. 23 points
32. Revision is evident or was not required. All errors have been corrected and feedback has been accurately incorporated for the Intervention criteria. A description of the evidence-based intervention is extremely thorough with substantial evidence and supporting literature. Two primary quantitative research article demonstrate support for the intervention.
33. 4. Acceptable
34. 21.16 points
35. NA
36. 3. Approaching
37. 20.24 points
38. Revision is generally evident. Feedback has been incorporated, but there are still some errors and inaccuracies. A description of the evidence-based intervention is presented with general supporting literature. One primary quantitative research article demonstrates support for the intervention. More evidence is needed.
39. 2. Insufficient
40. 18.4 points
41. NA
42. 1. Unsatisfactory
43. 0 points
44. A description of the intervention is included but lacks a sufficient amount of evidence. Revisions were made but did not correct or improve errors and inaccuracies.
45. Comparison
46. 2.3 points
47. Criteria Description
48. Revision is incorporated. Comparison of proposed intervention to current practice is presented.
49. 5. Target
50. 2.3 points
51. Revision is evident or was not required. All errors have been corrected and feedback has been accurately incorporated for the Comparison criteria. A description of the comparison information is extremely thorough with substantial evidence and measurable outcomes.
52. 4. Acceptable
53. 2.12 points
54. NA
55. 3. Approaching
56. 2.02 points
57. Revision is generally evident. Feedback has been incorporated, but there are still some errors and inaccuracies. A description of the comparison information is included but lacks evidence and measurable outcomes.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: DNP 801 Topic 8 PICOT-D Final Draft GCU 

58. 2. Insufficient
59. 1.84 points
60. NA
61. 1. Unsatisfactory
62. 0 points
63. Revisions were made but did not correct or improve errors and inaccuracies. A description of the comparison information is not included.
64. Outcome
65. 23 points
66. Criteria Description
67. Revision is incorporated. Outcome is patient-focused, specific, and measurable. Supporting research demonstrates that evidence-based intervention impacts stated patient outcome.
68. 5. Target
69. 23 points
70. Revision is evident or was not required. All errors have been corrected and feedback has been accurately incorporated for the Outcome criteria. A description of the outcome is extremely thorough with substantial evidence pertaining to a measurable population or patient outcome.
71. 4. Acceptable
72. 21.16 points
73. NA
74. 3. Approaching
75. 20.24 points
76. Revision is generally evident. Feedback has been incorporated, but there are still some errors and inaccuracies. A description of the outcome is included but lacks evidence pertaining to a measurable population or patient outcome.
77. 2. Insufficient
78. 18.4 points
79. NA
80. 1. Unsatisfactory

81. 0 points
82. A description of the outcome is not included. Revisions were made but did not correct or improve errors and inaccuracies.
83. Timeline
84. 1.15 points
85. Criteria Description
86. Revision is incorporated. Timeline is 8 weeks. Supporting evidence is presented.
87. 5. Target
88. 1.15 points
89. Revision is evident or was not required. All errors have been corrected and feedback has been accurately incorporated for the Timeline criteria. The timeline is specified as 8 weeks.
90. 4. Acceptable
91. 1.06 points
92. NA
93. 3. Approaching
94. 1.01 points
95. NA
96. 2. Insufficient
97. 0.92 points
98. NA
99. 1. Unsatisfactory
100. 0 points
101. Revisions were made but did not correct or improve errors and inaccuracies. The timeline is not specified or is deviates from the 8-week requirement.
102. PICOT-D Question
103. 34.5 points
104. Criteria Description
105. Revision incorporated. PICOT-D question succinctly reflects PICOT-D criteria.
106. 5. Target
107. 34.5 points
108. Revision is evident or was not required. The PICOT-D elements are present in one statement.
109. 4. Acceptable
110. 31.74 points
111. NA
112. 3. Approaching
113. 30.36 points
114. NA
115. 2. Insufficient
116. 27.6 points
117. NA
118. 1. Unsatisfactory
119. 0 points
120. Revisions were made but did not correct or improve errors and inaccuracies. Not all of the PICOT-D elements are present in the statement.
121. References
122. 17.25 points
123. Criteria Description
124. Meets criteria for primary quantitative research; published within 5 years of anticipated graduation date; working links are provided for each article. Clinical practice guideline included, if applicable.
125. 5. Target
126. 17.25 points
127. Revision is evident or was not required. Incorrect articles have been removed or replaced as indicated. Five primary quantitative research articles, published within 5 years of the anticipated graduation date, are presented. All five articles meet the criteria for primary research on the Levels of Evidence chart. Any applicable clinical practice guideline is included.
128. 4. Acceptable
129. 15.87 points
130. Revision is evident; there are very minor errors. Incorrect articles have been removed or replaced as indicated. Five primary quantitative research articles published within 5 years of the anticipated graduation date meet the criteria for primary research on the Levels of Evidence chart. Any applicable clinical practice guideline is included.
131. 3. Approaching
132. 15.18 points
133. Revision is generally evident. Incorrect articles have been removed as indicated, but one of the new articles does not meet the required criteria. Four primary quantitative research articles, published within 5 years of the anticipated graduation date, meet the criteria for primary research on the Levels of Evidence chart. Any applicable clinical practice guideline is included.
134. 2. Insufficient
135. 13.8 points
136. Revision is only sometimes evident. Incorrect articles have been removed as indicated, but two of the new articles do not meet the required criteria. Three primary quantitative research articles, published within 5 years of the anticipated graduation date, are presented and meet the criteria for primary research on the Levels of Evidence chart.
137. 1. Unsatisfactory
138. 0 points
139. Revision is not evident; or, replacement articles do not meet the required criteria. Overall, fewer than three articles meet the specified criteria. A clinical practice guideline should be listed but is omitted.
140. Paper Format
141. 2.3 points
142. Criteria Description
143. Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment.
144. 5. Target
145. 2.3 points
146. All format elements are correct.
147. 4. Acceptable
148. 2.12 points
149. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
150. 3. Approaching
151. 2.02 points
152. Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
153. 2. Insufficient
154. 1.84 points
155. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.
156. 1. Unsatisfactory
157. 0 points
158. Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.
159. Mechanics of Writing
160. 3.45 points
161. Criteria Description
162. Includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use.
163. 5. Target
164. 3.45 points
165. The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
166. 4. Acceptable
167. 3.17 points
168. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.
169. 3. Approaching
170. 3.04 points
171. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.
172. 2. Insufficient
173. 2.76 points
174. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct, but not varied.
175. 1. Unsatisfactory
176. 0 points
177. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is employed.
178. Documentation of Sources
179. 5.75 points
180. Criteria Description
181. Includes citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style.
182. 5. Target
183. 5.75 points
184. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of errors.
185. 4. Acceptable
186. 5.29 points
187. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.
188. 3. Approaching
189. 5.06 points
190. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.
191. 2. Insufficient
192. 4.6 points
193. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
194. 1. Unsatisfactory
195. 0 points
196. Sources are not documented.
197. Total 115 points

Criteria Description

Meets criteria for primary quantitative research; published within 5 years of anticipated graduation date; working links are provided for each article. Clinical practice guideline included, if applicable.

5. Target

17.25 points

Revision is evident or was not required. Incorrect articles have been removed or replaced as indicated. Five primary quantitative research articles, published within 5 years of the anticipated graduation date, are presented. All five articles meet the criteria for primary research on the Levels of Evidence chart. Any applicable clinical practice guideline is included.

4. Acceptable

15.87 points

Revision is evident; there are very minor errors. Incorrect articles have been removed or replaced as indicated. Five primary quantitative research articles published within 5 years of the anticipated graduation date meet the criteria for primary research on the Levels of Evidence chart. Any applicable clinical practice guideline is included.

3. Approaching

15.18 points

Revision is generally evident. Incorrect articles have been removed as indicated, but one of the new articles does not meet the required criteria. Four primary quantitative research articles, published within 5 years of the anticipated graduation date, meet the criteria for primary research on the Levels of Evidence chart. Any applicable clinical practice guideline is included.

2. Insufficient

13.8 points

Revision is only sometimes evident. Incorrect articles have been removed as indicated, but two of the new articles do not meet the required criteria. Three primary quantitative research articles, published within 5 years of the anticipated graduation date, are presented and meet the criteria for primary research on the Levels of Evidence chart.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Revision is not evident; or, replacement articles do not meet the required criteria. Overall, fewer than three articles meet the specified criteria. A clinical practice guideline should be listed but is omitted.

Paper Format

2.3 points

Criteria Description

Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment.

5. Target

2.3 points

All format elements are correct.

4. Acceptable

2.12 points

Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

3. Approaching

2.02 points

Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

2. Insufficient

1.84 points

Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

Mechanics of Writing

3.45 points

Criteria Description

Includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use.

5. Target

3.45 points

The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

4. Acceptable

3.17 points

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

3. Approaching

3.04 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

2. Insufficient

2.76 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct, but not varied.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is employed.

Documentation of Sources

5.75 points

Criteria Description

Includes citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style.

5. Target

5.75 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of errors.

4. Acceptable

5.29 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

3. Approaching

5.06 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

2. Insufficient

4.6 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Sources are not documented.

ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS

Discussion Questions (DQ)

Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, include a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words.

Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source.

One or two sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words.

I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.

Weekly Participation

Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately.

In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies.

Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work).

Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.

APA Format and Writing Quality

Familiarize yourself with APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required).

Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation.

I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.

Use of Direct Quotes

I discourage overutilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Masters’ level and deduct points accordingly.

As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an underastanding of the content or critical analysis of the content.

It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:

Lopes Write Policy

For assignments that need to be submitted to Lopes Write, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me.

Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes.

Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own?

Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.

Late Policy

The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies.

Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances.

If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect.

I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension.

As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.

Communication

Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me:

Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class.

Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.

Important information for writing discussion questions and participation

Welcome to class

Hello class and welcome to the class and I will be your instructor for this course. This is a -week course and requires a lot of time commitment, organization, and a high level of dedication. Please use the class syllabus to guide you through all the assignments required for the course. I have also attached the classroom policies to this announcement to know your expectations for this course. Please review this document carefully and ask me any questions if you do. You could email me at any time or send me a message via the “message” icon in halo if you need to contact me. I check my email regularly, so you should get a response within 24 hours. If you have not heard from me within 24 hours and need to contact me urgently, please send a follow up text to

I strongly encourage that you do not wait until the very last minute to complete your assignments. Your assignments in weeks 4 and 5 require early planning as you would need to present a teaching plan and interview a community health provider. I advise you look at the requirements for these assignments at the beginning of the course and plan accordingly. I have posted the YouTube link that explains all the class assignments in detail. It is required that you watch this 32-minute video as the assignments from week 3 through 5 require that you follow the instructions to the letter to succeed. Failure to complete these assignments according to instructions might lead to a zero. After watching the video, please schedule a one-on-one with me to discuss your topic for your project by the second week of class. Use this link to schedule a 15-minute session. Please, call me at the time of your appointment on my number. Please note that I will NOT call you.

Please, be advised I do NOT accept any assignments by email. If you are having technical issues with uploading an assignment, contact the technical department and inform me of the issue. If you have any issues that would prevent you from getting your assignments to me by the deadline, please inform me to request a possible extension. Note that working fulltime or overtime is no excuse for late assignments. There is a 5%-point deduction for every day your assignment is late. This only applies to approved extensions. Late assignments will not be accepted.

If you think you would be needing accommodations due to any reasons, please contact the appropriate department to request accommodations.

Plagiarism is highly prohibited. Please ensure you are citing your sources correctly using APA 7th edition. All assignments including discussion posts should be formatted in APA with the appropriate spacing, font, margin, and indents. Any papers not well formatted would be returned back to you, hence, I advise you review APA formatting style. I have attached a sample paper in APA format and will also post sample discussion responses in subsequent announcements.

Your initial discussion post should be a minimum of 200 words and response posts should be a minimum of 150 words. Be advised that I grade based on quality and not necessarily the number of words you post. A minimum of TWO references should be used for your initial post. For your response post, you do not need references as personal experiences would count as response posts. If you however cite anything from the literature for your response post, it is required that you cite your reference. You should include a minimum of THREE references for papers in this course.

Please note that references should be no more than 5 years old except recommended as a resource for the class. Furthermore, for each discussion board question, you need ONE initial substantive response and TWO substantive responses to either your classmates or your instructor for a total of THREE responses. There are TWO discussion questions each week, hence, you need a total minimum of SIX discussion posts for each week. I usually post a discussion question each week. You could also respond to these as it would count towards your required SIX discussion posts for the week.

I understand this is a lot of information to cover in 5 weeks, however, the Bible says in Philippians 4:13 that we can do all things through Christ that strengthens us. Even in times like this, we are encouraged by God’s word that we have that ability in us to succeed with His strength. I pray that each and every one of you receives strength for this course and life generally as we navigate through this pandemic that is shaking our world today. Relax and enjoy the course!

Hi Class,

Please read through the following information on writing a Discussion question response and participation posts.

Contact me if you have any questions.

Important information on Writing a Discussion Question

• Your response needs to be a minimum of 150 words (not including your list of references)
• There needs to be at least TWO references with ONE being a peer reviewed professional journal article.
• Include in-text citations in your response
• Do not include quotes—instead summarize and paraphrase the information
• Follow APA-7th edition
• Points will be deducted if the above is not followed

Participation –replies to your classmates or instructor

• A minimum of 6 responses per week, on at least 3 days of the week.
• Each response needs at least ONE reference with citations—best if it is a peer reviewed journal article
• Each response needs to be at least 75 words in length (does not include your list of references)
• Responses need to be substantive by bringing information to the discussion or further enhance the discussion. Responses of “I agree” or “great post” does not count for the word count.
• Follow APA 7th edition
• Points will be deducted if the above is not followed

• Remember to use and follow APA-7th edition for all weekly assignments, discussion questions, and participation points.
• Here are some helpful links
• Student paper example
• Citing Sources
• The Writing Center is a great resource