Discussion: Role of the RN APRN in Policy Evaluation Essay
Discussion: Role of the RN APRN in Policy Evaluation Essay
Healthcare policies are a collection of decisions, goals, and actions created to positively impact the health and wellbeing of the community. The scope of policies can be as small as teams within a healthcare institution to as broad as the entire nation. Nurses learn policies to enable them to increase positive outcomes during the process of care. For instance, they may reduce the risk of contracting a particular disease. Nurses can also use their knowledge and expertise to improve the efficiency of existing policies and propose future policies (Lee et al., 2018). Tobacco tax is an example of state healthcare policies. Tobacco smoking increases the risk of lung cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Upward adjustment of tobacco taxes aims to discourage the use of the product, hence improving health and wellbeing of the community. This discussion reviews the tobacco tax policy.
Tobacco taxes are considered among the most effective policies in discouraging the use of tobacco use especially among younger people (world Health Organization, 2021). Increasing the taxes increases the prices of the products, hence making them expensive. As such, it reduces the number of habitual smokers. The policy also helps to increase revenues for the government. The funds are used to finance other tobacco policies, such as community education. Each state of the United States determines the amount to tax to impose on tobacco products depending on its unique goals and objectives. The most effective criteria for measuring the effectiveness of the policy is determining the decrease in tobacco use after the implementation of the policy. A significant decline implies that the policy was highly successful. No change, on the contrary, implies that the policy was not successful, thus requiring some modifications.
Social determinants such as the impact of the policies on employment affect the policy. The Tobacco industry is a multibillion industry that provides employment for millions of Americans. A drop in revenues caused by the impacts of the tobacco taxes results in loss of employment (Sheikh et al., 2021). However, there is a need to balance between the economic and health benefits of the product. If it costs the country much more to treat tobacco related illnesses than the economic benefits of the product, it is justifiable to impose much higher taxes to discourage the cultivation and consumption of tobacco.
Struggling to Meet Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on Discussion: Role of the RN APRN in Policy Evaluation Essay done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!
Lee, H.-F., Chiang, H.-Y., & Kuo, H.-T. (2018). Relationship between authentic leadership and nurses’ intent to leave: The mediating role of work environment and Burnout. Journal of Nursing Management, 27(1), 52–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12648
Sheikh, Z. D., Branston, J. R., & Gilmore, A. B. (2021). Tobacco industry pricing strategies in response to Excise Tax Policies: A systematic review. Tobacco Control, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2021-056630
World Health Organization. (2021). WHO technical manual on tobacco tax policy and administration. Geneva: World Health Organization.
I enjoyed reading your post. Nurses must participate in the establishment of health policies, according to nursing organizations and healthcare professionals. Policy evaluation would provide a better understanding of a policy’s value, efficacy, and worth (Ellenbecker, et al., 2017). RNs and APRNS could take part in various chances to influence and change the health policy agenda during the policy review process.
Beginning with an analysis and assessment of the literature on health policy study, APRNS could start their evaluation process. According to Williams and Anderson (2018), APRNS could use their expertise to contribute intelligently to policy debates that seek to develop efficient and patient-centered health policies.
Both registered nurses (RNs) and advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs) make up a sizeable portion of the healthcare profession, giving the nursing workforce the unique ability to influence healthcare reforms by offering support and direction to elected officials in order to impact legislation. A number of nurses lack sufficient political knowledge. As a result, nurses should be permitted to attend some legislative proceedings to increase their expertise in formulating public policy.
Consequently, throughout the policy review process, RNs may provide expert evidence, serve as subject matter experts, and win over legislators. All policy assessments have difficulties, although some of these are unique to the evaluation procedure. These include a lack of resources or a hazy evaluation position. There may not be enough data to back up the position taken by nurses who are pushing for a policy change.
The presentation of developing data and feedback channels might be considerably improved through advocacy through regional nurse associations. Nurses can get the necessary expertise to assist the review of health policy by attending professional conferences and health meetings sponsored by nursing organizations.
The presentation of developing data and feedback channels might be considerably improved through advocacy through regional nurse associations. Nurses cam get the necessary expertise to assist the review of health policy by attending professional conferences and health meetings sponsored by nursing organizations (Williams & Anderson, 2018).
Through national organizations that are affiliated with the worldwide council of nurses, nurses might participate in politics. Research studies, governmental organizations, and nursing organizations might all provide extra knowledge to nurses. Additionally, organizations like the AN may provide written information on how to participate in politics and advocate effectively.
ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER ASSIGNMENT: Discussion: Role of the RN APRN in Policy Evaluation Essay
- Ellenbecker, C. H., Fawcett, J., Jones, E. J., Mahoney, D., Rowlands, B., & Waddell, A. (2017). A Staged Approach to Educating Nurses in Health Policy. Policy, Politics, & Nursing Practice, 18(1), 44-56. https://doi.org/10.1177/152715441770925
- Williams, Janet K., and Cindy M. Anderson. “Omics Research Ethics Considerations.” Nursing Outlook, vol. 66, no. 4, July 2018 386-393, 10.1016/j.outlook. 2011
In the Module 4 Discussion, you considered how professional nurses can become involved in policy-making. A critical component of any policy design is evaluation of the results. How comfortable are you with the thought of becoming involved with such matters?
Some nurses may be hesitant to get involved with policy evaluation. The preference may be to focus on the care and well-being of their patients; some nurses may feel ill-equipped to enter the realm of policy and political activities.
- However, as you have examined previously, who better to advocate for patients and effective programs and polices than nurses?
- Already patient advocates in interactions with doctors and leadership, why not with government and regulatory agencies?
In this Discussion, you will reflect on the role of professional nurses in policy evaluation.
In the Module 4 Discussion, you considered how professional nurses can become involved in policy-making. Review the Resources and reflect on the role of professional nurses in policy evaluation.
Evaluation Topic: The Affordable Care Act (ACA) and its impact on healthcare access and equity.
The Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare, was signed into law in 2010 with the intention of improving access to healthcare, lowering healthcare costs, and protecting consumers from unfair insurance practices (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services [HHS], 2021). The ACA’s key provisions include Medicaid expansion, the establishment of health insurance marketplaces, and the provision of subsidies for individuals and families to purchase health insurance. This evaluation examines the ACA’s effectiveness in meeting its objectives and assesses its impact on various social determinants.
Criteria Used for Evaluation:
Insurance Coverage: The evaluation assesses how successful the ACA has been in expanding health insurance coverage to previously uninsured people and lowering the overall uninsured rate (Sommers, Gunja, Finegold, & Musco, 2015).
Affordability: The evaluation assesses individuals’ and families’ ability to afford ACA-mandated health insurance premiums, deductibles, and out-of-pocket costs (HHS, 2021).
Social Determinants Impact:
By expanding access to healthcare and providing financial assistance to vulnerable populations, the ACA has made significant strides in addressing social determinants of health. According to research, states that expanded Medicaid under the ACA saw significant reductions in uninsured people and improvements in healthcare access for low-income people (Sommers et al., 2015). Furthermore, the ACA has aided in the reduction of racial and ethnic disparities in healthcare coverage (Artiga, Orgera, & Damico, 2019).
However, many people continue to struggle with affordability, particularly those in states that did not expand Medicaid and those with high out-of-pocket costs (HHS, 2021). Social determinants such as income, race, and geographic location continue to have an impact on people’s ability to access affordable, high-quality healthcare, and these factors should be considered in future evaluations and policy changes.
The role of professional nurses in this policy evaluation.
Professional nurses are critical in assessing the Affordable Care Act (ACA) policy, ensuring that it meets the needs of patients and contributes to improved healthcare access, affordability, and quality (American Nurses Association [ANA], 2021). Their unique perspective and understanding of patient needs, health disparities, and healthcare systems can significantly inform the ACA’s effectiveness evaluation.
Assess the ACA’s impact on patient care: Nurses can monitor and evaluate how the ACA affects patient care, such as access to healthcare services, preventive care, and chronic condition management (Coffman, 2021).
Examine how the ACA has influenced nursing practice, such as changes in nurse-to-patient ratios, scope of practice, and interdisciplinary collaboration (Mason, Gardner, Outlaw, & O’Grady, 2016).
Conduct ACA outcomes research: Nurses can participate in research to assess the ACA’s effectiveness in improving healthcare coverage, reducing disparities, and promoting health equity (Artiga, Orgera, & Damico, 2019).
Advocate for ACA policy changes: Based on their experiences and evaluation findings, professional nurses can advocate for ACA policy changes to address gaps in coverage, affordability, and quality of care (ANA, 2021).
Professional nurses can help ensure that the ACA policy meets its objectives, addresses health disparities, and supports the provision of quality care to all individuals by actively participating in policy evaluation.
American Nurses Association. (2021). Policy & Advocacy. https://www.nursingworld.org/practice-policy/advocacy/Links to an external site.
Artiga, S., Orgera, K., & Damico, A. (2019). Changes in Health Coverage by Race and Ethnicity since the ACA, 2010-2018. Kaiser Family Foundation. https://www.kff.org/racial-equity-and-health-policy/issue-brief/changes-in-health-coverage-by-race-and-ethnicity-since-the-aca-2010-2018/Links to an external site.
Coffman, S. (2021). The Role of Nurses in Health Policy and Advocacy. NurseJournal.org. https://nursejournal.org/community/the-role-of-nurses-in-health-policy-and-advocacy/Links to an external site.
Mason, D. J., Gardner, D. B., Outlaw, F. H., & O’Grady, E. T. (2016). Policy and Politics in Nursing and Health Care (7th ed.). Elsevier.
By Day 3 of Week 9
Post an explanation of at least two opportunities that currently exist for RNs and APRNs to actively participate in policy review. Explain some of the challenges that these opportunities may present and describe how you might overcome these challenges. Finally, recommend two strategies you might make to better advocate for or communicate the existence of these opportunities. Be specific and provide examples.
By Day 6 of Week 9
Respond to at least two of your colleagues* on two different days by suggesting additional opportunities or recommendations for overcoming the challenges described by your colleagues.
Click on the Reply button below to reveal the textbox for entering your message. Then click on the Submit button to post your message.
*Note: Throughout this program, your fellow students are referred to as colleagues.
You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized.
Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes.
Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages.
Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor.
The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument.
ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS
Discussion Questions (DQ)
- Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, include a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words.
- Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source.
- One or two sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words.
- I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.
- Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately.
- In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies.
- Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work).
- Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.
APA Format and Writing Quality
- Familiarize yourself with APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required).
- Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation.
- I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.
Use of Direct Quotes
- I discourage overutilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Masters’ level and deduct points accordingly.
- As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content.
- It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source.
- For assignments that need to be submitted to LopesWrite, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me.
- Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes.
- Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own?
- Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.
- The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies.
- Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances.
- If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect.
- I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension.
- As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.
Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me:
- Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class.
- Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.
Nurses are the backbones of the medical system. The nursing profession is the largest in the U.S. healthcare industry. For seventeen consecutive years, nursing ranked the most trusted job in Gallop’s ethic survey (For the 17th Year in a Row, Nurses Top Gallup’s Poll of Most Trusted Profession | AHA News, 2019).
With so many responsibilities in nursing, it is an obligation that nurses actively participate in the policy review. By involving in policy review, nurses draft and analyze policies to be in a better position to advocate for their patients. This post will discuss the opportunities that currently exist for RNs and APRNs to actively participate in policymaking.
One opportunity for RNs and APRNs to actively participate in policymaking is policy draft. Through policy drafts, nurses will be able to identify topics that will be critical for the next few years in healthcare. For example, Covid-19 pandemic really took a toll in U.S. healthcare industry. As of date, over 700,000 people have died from Covid-19 infection in America (CDC, 2020).
Nurses played a significant role in the fight against Covid-19 and continue in the path to defeat this deadly virus. Professional experiences of the nurses who worked with Covid-19 infected patients speak volumes about how exhausted the healthcare system is. During the rollout of the Covid-19 vaccines, professional nurses were argued to engage in the vaccine advocacy campaign.
Advocacy is a skill that nurses often use in their career; therefore, pairing that skill with a policy draft will enable nurses to organize the policy document with operational benefits properly. A well-drafted document will be easier to administer, maintain and enforce. Likewise, Rasheed et al. (2020, P 447, Para 2) stress the importance that “due to their close interactions with individuals and communities across the healthcare system, nurses can offer greater direct insights concerning the effect of healthcare policies on individuals and communities.”
So, nurses need to be the drafters of the policies because it will reduce the overall amount of time an organization needs to spend on those activities, for example, vaccine advocacy programs. Appropriate content and specific knowledge and skills are essential in the policy document to avoid valuable time being wasted editing, discussing, and rewording statements that do not belong in the policy in the first place.
After completing a well-drafted policy document, nurses can participate in policy analysis and evaluate the current policy. They can make a judgment about what went well and what did not, “whom to involve in future efforts, whom to trust, what the most effective timing is, how to create more powerful coalitions, and so forth” (Yoder‐Wise, 2019, p 52).
The evaluation step is crucial because it allows the group to determine how to protect the current success and strategies needed to succeed. However, there are challenges to these opportunities. Policy drafting and analysis opportunities may present challenges because of poor technical knowledge and clinical skills and a lack of exposure to federal and state government involvement (Scott and Scott, 2020).
These current opportunities present challenges that can be overcome by proper training regarding policy draft and analysis during undergraduate nursing level and, of course, at the graduate level, encouraging students and faculty to participate in politics for policymaking and visiting the state and federal policy places. Scott and Scott (2020) argue that establishing relationships with policymakers is one of the best methods to get your issue on their agenda; it is about who you know and how you can influence them to listen to you.
Therefore, nurses must visit their local representatives to understand their stand on specific issues. For example, if the nurse advocates for Covid-19 vaccines, they need to know how their local representative feels about the mass vaccination because if the representative does not fully support the vaccines, then the nurses will lose the support for publicizing the importance of the vaccines.
The representative can lobby against it because it is not profitable for them, challenging the nurses to prove their support and decisions. If that becomes the case, nurses can use irrefutable evidence and knowledge more clearly and justifiably to publicize their support for the policy.
The strategies for better advocating are training and education programs for the nurses. Nurses already understand that they are the largest number of healthcare professionals in the healthcare industry, and therefore, their voices and suggestions are essential. Advocating for patients at the bedside is as important as advocating for them at the state or federal government. Nurses must understand that what they want for their patients, only they can deliver, and so, therefore, no one else can provide that on their behalf (Scott and Scott 2020). Suggestions from nurses will ensure safe and quality care through policymaking.
- CDC. (2020, March 28). COVID Data Tracker. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#datatracker-home
- For the 17th year in a row, nurses top Gallup’s poll of most trusted profession | AHA News. (2019, January 9). American Hospital Association | AHA News. https://www.aha.org/news/insights-and-analysis/2019-01-09-17th-year-row-nurses-top-gallups-poll-most-trusted-profession
- Rasheed, S. P., Younas, A., & Mehdi, F. (2020). Challenges, Extent of Involvement, and the Impact of Nurses’ Involvement in Politics and Policy Making in in Last Two Decades: An Integrative Review. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 52(4), 446–455. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12567
- Scott, S. M., & Scott, P. A. (2020). Nursing, advocacy and public policy. Nursing Ethics, 28(5), 723–733. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733020961823
- Yoder‐Wise, P. S. (2019). A framework for planned policy change. Nursing Forum, 55(1), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/nuf.12381
Bottom of Form
Tax-payer dollars are a conundrum of sorts but not to mention always a hot topic of debates at the capital, city halls, and local towns. After all, the publics’ voting is reflective of what each candidate will be doing with taxpayers’ dollars. Program and policy in nursing are no different. For example, money, in the form of tax-payer dollars, is being requested to be allocated to either reshape, support a bill, or research and not personal monies Laureate Education (2018b). A great majority of decisions and programs at the federal, state, and local levels, involve the health status of the population Milstead and Short (2019). One must be engaged in continuous evaluation at every level of program planning related to the economic impact as tax-payer dollars Milstead and Short (2019). Nurses impact policy through evaluation are poised to measure what the impact is likely to be and the effectiveness of the implemented program, outcomes, or policy Laureate Education (2018b). Furthermore, nurses can review current policy, like at their place of employment or within their practicing state, and engage in evaluation to see why a process did not work Milstead and Short (2019). According to Milstead and Short (2019), nurses must be in the hierarchy of those in attendance having a pivotal voice at meetings for the redesign of healthcare systems. This includes being engaged from the beginning of policy planning with key participants, to program evaluation of healthcare policies within facilities Milstead and Short (2019). Also, the bill could also come from congress that a nurse may evaluate Laureate Education (2018b). Nurses should utilize the “five-step” framework from the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for the evaluation in public health CDC (n.d.). Nurses must promote cost clarity, patient education, and assist with the dispersion of accurate evaluation results Milstead and Short (2019). Leadership roles, like that of nurses, at times are met with adversity.
Discussion: Role of the RN APRN in Policy Evaluation Essay Challenges
There can be several challenges during program planning more so if the program is not completed in a tried format. This can be burdensome on program planning; however, most can be alleviated. Some of these challenges are out of the hands of the researcher and others are more apparent. For example, at times, the new policy may go through congress quickly or too slow with the respective audience, either the branch of government or the public, requesting the evaluation results quicker than anticipated Milstead and Short (2019). Also, when comparing the context of other policies, deficiency of suitable data results may exhibit making it difficult to determine the effect Milstead and Short (2019). Some evaluation results can be unexpected and can divide communities creating a new focus regarding social or health policies Milstead and Short (2019). Take COVID-19 for example, where some regions were being hit much harder than others and that required refocus and replanning for the safety of everyone. Limited resources or not having the appropriate person to complete the evaluation could also jeopardize program evaluations Milstead and Short (2019). According to Laureate Education (2018b), while measuring the efficiency or effectiveness of a program that did not yield expected results can result in inaccurate results. Fortunately, there are available steps nursing and other vital personal can integrate to decrease or alleviate the above-listed challenges.
How to Overcome Challenges
For program planning, one can be proactive to prevent problems that occur during the program evaluation from a nursing standpoint. Assigning a “point person” to the program is instrumental for the success of a program for they are a professional analyst who is accountable for compiling and creating the evaluation (Milstead & Short, 2019, p. 122). Other strategies available to nurses to guide effective evaluation and overcome challenges include the following. Implementing and applying a series of predetermined questions to the research program will address some challenges before they occur Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ, 2021). For example, is the bill or program doing what it is intended to do? How was the data collected and analyzed? Was the data reviewed by a trustworthy research team? Is it unbiased and complete Laureate Education (2018b)? Furthermore, AHRQ (2021) has compiled several questions to answer during the development of the plan. Some of these include “Who needs to act on the results and who will make decisions based on the results?” (AHRQ, 2021). Ethical issues need to be addressed and governed during the program building to ensure reliability and effectiveness.
Laureate Education (2018a) discusses ethics and advocacy and a point addressed is when a program is implemented, the creation of another implication can be created to address the ethics component of it. For example, it could have been argued that when the needle exchange program went into effect that there would be more drug users. Instead, to address the ethics component, this program had a triple purpose with two ultimately addressing the risk of increased drug users. These included addressing the overdose with drug treatment options, needle exchange, and training addicts to revive those that have overdoses Laureate Education (2018a). In addition, available to nurses is the “Five-step framework” to guide policies and programs with guidelines regarding public health actions (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, n.d.).
Strategies to Advocate or Communicate the Existence of these Opportunities
To any plan, or project created or altered, strategies are available to communicate the existence of the prior discussed opportunities. To address ethical issues, there is professional organizations that provide ethical guidelines for evaluation CDC (n.d.). For example, American Counseling Association, the American Psychological Association, and other professional organizations have available a series of ethical principles questions and principles that nurses should utilize while implementing and creating their planning Milstead and Short (2019). Milstead and Short (2019) have a list of strategies that can be used during the project planning that are directly related to communication approaches. These include using the most suitable methods during the evaluation, such as the CDC framework for program evaluation. Also, to identify key participants and multiple other vital members with the overall aim, and address conflicts rapidly. Lastly, habitually connecting with members throughout the execution and evaluation cycle of the project is critical Milstead and Short (2019). These strategies when combined with other beneficial theories and guidelines can have a positive effect on the entire process of project planning from beginning to end Milstead and Short (2019).
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2021). Elements of an Evaluation Plan. Retrieved from ahrq.gov
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (n.d.). Program Performance and Evaluation Office (PPEO). Retrieved from cdc.gov
Laureate Education (Producer). (2018a). Peter Beilenson: Ethics and advocacy [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.
Laureate Education (Producer). (2018b). The Importance of Program Evaluation [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.
Milstead, J. A., & Short, N. M. (2019). Health policy and politics: A nurse’s guide (6th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
The healthcare program I decided to look at was the Affordable Care Act (ACA). The ACA was signed into law by President Barack Obama back in 2010 with the goal of lowering the number of uninsured persons in the country. The evaluation I looked at was done in the state of Maryland and presented statistics regarding the number of uninsured, cost to the consumer, and government spending regarding the ACA. According to the Effect of the Affordable Care Act in Maryland, between 2013 and 2016 the number of uninsured persons in Maryland dropped 38.8 percent, with the cost of insurance increasing 24 percent and the tax relief for insurance increasing 152 percent (n.d.). The ACA is estimated to increase spending from the federal government by 1.4 trillion dollars between 2017 and 2026 (n.d.). Overall, this program was very expensive to the federal government and in turn to the taxpayer. Those who were already insured ended up paying more for their insurance while not necessarily benefitting from the tax breaks provided. The ACA did however cut the amount of uninsured people by a significant amount. This program is subject to constant change due to the main two parties differing on opinions of it.
The social determinants affected by this program are lower socioeconomic level citizens and the elderly. The ACA did allow for people who could not necessarily afford health insurance to have greater access. As well as expanding Medicare and Medicaid to greater impact the elderly and those with long term disabilities.
Evaluation Topic: Affordable Care Act
In 2010, the United States government passed a law called the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (eHealth Insurance, 2022). Its goals included expanding access to health insurance, ensure that every American could afford health insurance and bettering the quality of healthcare for all Americans (eHealth Insurance, 2022). Several parts of the Affordable Care Act facilitate increased access to insurance, a broader selection of therapies for patients, and stronger healthcare delivery systems. The reform has resulted in vast improvements to health insurance in the United States.
Outline of the Evaluation
Considering the ACA’s stated aims of increasing access, decreasing costs, improving quality, and addressing social and economic determinants of health. The success of the ACA was evaluated using both numerical and qualitative metrics. Quantitative criteria included the overall cost of health care in the United States, the percentage of the population without health insurance, the availability and cost of specific medical procedures and treatments, and so on (Kenton, 2022). The quality of care provided to patients since the adoption of the Affordable Care Act was evaluated based on survey data collected from patients, feedback from stakeholders, and healthcare providers’ responses to surveys about the quality of care they have been able to provide.
Sign-up rates, coverage retention rates, premium prices, and the availability of doctors and hospitals that accept the Affordable Care Act were only few of the measures used to evaluate the success of the program. The success of the program was measured in a number of ways (Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, 2019): by the number of people who signed up, by how many of them kept their coverage, by how much it cost to maintain, and by how many medical professionals were willing to take ACA patients.
Examples of social determinants of health include a person’s living conditions, working conditions, and social environment. The Affordable Care Act (ACA) has made some efforts to address the socioeconomic determinants of health, such as poverty, education, access to healthy food and transportation, and exposure to violence.Urban neighborhoods have benefited greatly from a method of gauging a project’s success that compares the access to healthcare experienced by people of varying racial and ethnic backgrounds who live in urban and rural settings.
Any evaluation of the Affordable Care Act’s success should focus on improving health outcomes and expanding access to health care for vulnerable populations. The goal is to give a balanced assessment of the ACA so that policymakers in Washington may make well-informed decisions about the future of health care in the United States.
I like your post and your views regarding policy evaluation of Affordable Care Act. According to ASPE (office of the Assistant Secretary For planning and Evaluation), “the briefing book features key findings from two dozen reports published” in 2021-2022 to find out the outcomes of ACA success. Also, ASPE further illustrated that mostly reports published by Department of Health and Human Services which collaboratively works with CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) who not only analyze the strategies but also implement those strategies nationwide. They analyze that people after implementation of ACA coverage of the insurance increased from 2016-2019, improving access to preventive services for millions of Americans, interest of population has also increased (ASPE, 2021 March 18). I think comparisons of pre and post implementation of Datas is an effective way to analyze the effectiveness of new policies.
I agree with you that because of excessive costs people were not able to get coverage and with ACA it makes easier for people under poverty line to get coverage. Another act of Medicare for All Act of 2022, will also overcome the discriminations in which “No person shall, on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, marital status, citizenship status, primary language use, genetic conditions, previous or existing medical conditions, religion, or sex, including sex stereotyping, gender identity, sexual orientation, and pregnancy and related medical conditions (including termination of pregnancy), be excluded from participation in or be denied the benefits of the program established under this Act (except as expressly authorized by this Act” (Congress. Gov). If this act becomes law, then this health policy will also bring health equity among US residents.
Don’t wait until the last minute
Fill in your requirements and let our experts deliver your work asap.