Discussion: NR 392 PDSA Case Study
Discussion: NR 392 PDSA Case Study
The purpose of this discussion is for learners to: complete a partial PDSA worksheet and to solve an issue working in a team of their peers to exchange and share ideas.
This discussion enables the student to meet the following course outcome:
CO 1: Describe the role of the BSN nurse in collaborative quality improvement. (POs 2, 7)
Struggling to Meet Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on Discussion: NR 392 PDSA Case Study done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!
CO 3: Discuss culture of safety and ethical principles in quality patient centered care. (POs 6, 7)
Discussions are designed to promote dialogue between faculty and students, and students and their peers. In discussions students:
Demonstrate understanding of concepts for the week
Integrate scholarly resources
Engage in meaningful dialogue with classmates
Express opinions clearly and logically, in a professional manner
Use the rubric on this page as you compose your answers.
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: Discussion: NR 392 PDSA Case Study
Step 1: Read the following case study: Increase in Pressure Injuries
There have been 5 cases of pressure injuries in the last month. The previous month there was one case. In all cases, the patients were older than 60 years old and had limited mobility. The QI committee has created the following Aim statement:
Aim Statement: In our setting, there will be zero pressure injuries to any patient in the next month.
Step 2: As part of the QI committee, you will be completing the Plan portion of the PDSA.
Your answer post is based on the first letter of your last name. For example, if your last name is Smith, you would create your Plan for the Acute Care setting.
The First Letter of your Last Name Setting
A-M Long term care
N-Z Acute care
Answer the following questions. Your post should look like:
Paragraph one: Describe the change that should be implemented using at least one scholarly nursing source from the Chamberlain library to support this intervention.
Paragraph two: Describe the predicted outcome.
Paragraph three: Identify who will be involved in implementing and evaluating the change.
Resources: Include reference for scholarly nursing source used
Step 3: Reply to classmates in either group.
Late Assignment Policy
Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Assignments submitted after the due date and time will receive a deduction of 10% of the total points possible for that assignment for each day the assignment is late. Assignments will be accepted, with penalty as described, up to a maximum of three days late, after which point a zero will be recorded for the assignment.
In the event of an emergency that prevents timely submission of an assignment, students may petition their instructor for a waiver of the late submission grade reduction. The instructor will review the student’s rationale for the request and make a determination based on the merits of the student’s appeal. Consideration of the student’s total course performance to date will be a contributing factor in the determination. Students should continue to attend class, actively participate, and complete other assignments while the appeal is pending.
This Policy applies to assignments that contribute to the numerical calculation of the course letter grade.
The maximum score in this class is 1,000 points. The categories, which contribute to your final grade, are weighted as follows.
|Discussion (50 points, Weeks 1–7; 25 points, Week 8)||375||37.5%|
|Shared Governance Model Paper (Week 3)||200||20%|
|Management of Power Paper (Week 5)||200||20%|
|Executive Summary (Week 7)||225||22.5%|
No extra credit assignments are permitted for any reason.
All of your course requirements are graded using points. At the end of the course, the points are converted to a letter grade using the scale in the table below. Percentages of 0.5% or higher are not raised to the next whole number. A final grade of 76% (letter grade C) is required to pass the course.
|A||940–1,000||94% to 100%|
|A-||920–939||92% to 93%|
|B+||890–919||89% to 91%|
|B||860–889||86% to 88%|
|B-||840–859||84% to 85%|
|C+||810–839||81% to 83%|
|C||760–809||76% to 80%|
|F||759 and below||75% and below|
NOTE:To receive credit for a week’s discussion, students may begin posting no earlier than the Sunday immediately before each week opens. Unless otherwise specified, access to most weeks begins on Sunday at 12:01 a.m. MT, and that week’s assignments are due by the next Sunday by 11:59 p.m. MT. Week 8 opens at 12:01 a.m. MT Sunday and closes at 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday. Any assignments and all discussion requirements must be completed by 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday of the eighth week.
Students agree that, by taking this course, all required papers may be subject to submission for textual similarity review to Turnitin.com for the detection of plagiarism. All submitted papers will be included as source documents in the Turnitin.com reference database solely for the purpose of detecting plagiarism of such papers. Use of the Turnitin.com service is subject to the Terms and Conditions of Use posted on the Turnitin.com site.
Participation for MSN
Threaded Discussion Guiding Principles
The ideas and beliefs underpinning the threaded discussions (TDs) guide students through engaging dialogues as they achieve the desired learning outcomes/competencies associated with their course in a manner that empowers them to organize, integrate, apply and critically appraise their knowledge to their selected field of practice. The use of TDs provides students with opportunities to contribute level-appropriate knowledge and experience to the topic in a safe, caring, and fluid environment that models professional and social interaction. The TD’s ebb and flow is based upon the composition of student and faculty interaction in the quest for relevant scholarship. Participation in the TDs generates opportunities for students to actively engage in the written ideas of others by carefully reading, researching, reflecting, and responding to the contributions of their peers and course faculty. TDs foster the development of members into a community of learners as they share ideas and inquiries, consider perspectives that may be different from their own, and integrate knowledge from other disciplines.
Each weekly threaded discussion is worth up to 25 points. Students must post a minimum of two times in each graded thread. The two posts in each individual thread must be on separate days. The student must provide an answer to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week. If the student does not provide an answer to each graded thread topic (not a response to a student peer) before the Wednesday deadline, 5 points are deducted for each discussion thread in which late entry occurs (up to a 10-point deduction for that week). Subsequent posts, including essential responses to peers, must occur by the Sunday deadline, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week.
Good writing calls for the limited use of direct quotes. Direct quotes in Threaded Discussions are to be limited to one short quotation (not to exceed 15 words). The quote must add substantively to the discussion. Points will be deducted under the Grammar, Syntax, APA category.
Grading Rubric Guidelines
Don’t wait until the last minute
Fill in your requirements and let our experts deliver your work asap.