CASE STUDY ON MORAL STATUS PHI 413

Grand Canyon University CASE STUDY ON MORAL STATUS PHI 413-Step-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Grand Canyon University CASE STUDY ON MORAL STATUS PHI 413 assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for CASE STUDY ON MORAL STATUS PHI 413                       

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Grand Canyon University CASE STUDY ON MORAL STATUS PHI 413 depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for CASE STUDY ON MORAL STATUS PHI 413                       

The introduction for the Grand Canyon University CASE STUDY ON MORAL STATUS PHI 413 is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

How to Write the Body for CASE STUDY ON MORAL STATUS PHI 413                       

After the introduction, move into the main part of the CASE STUDY ON MORAL STATUS PHI 413  assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for CASE STUDY ON MORAL STATUS PHI 413                       

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for CASE STUDY ON MORAL STATUS PHI 413                       

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the CASE STUDY ON MORAL STATUS PHI 413 assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

Sample Answer for CASE STUDY ON MORAL STATUS PHI 413 Included After Question

Assessment Description

Based on “Case Study: Fetal Abnormality” and the required topic Resources, write a 750-1,000-word reflection that answers the following questions:

1. What is the Christian view of the nature of human persons, and which theory of moral status is it compatible with? How is this related to the intrinsic human value and dignity?
2. Which theory or theories are being used by Jessica, Marco, Maria, and Dr. Wilson to determine the moral status of the fetus? What from the case study specifically leads you to believe that they hold the theory you selected?
3. How does the theory determine or influence each of their recommendations for action?
4. What theory do you agree with? Why? How would that theory determine or influence the recommendation for action?

Remember to support your responses with the topic Resources.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: CASE STUDY ON MORAL STATUS PHI 413

Title:  CASE STUDY ON MORAL STATUS PHI 413

Moral status encompasses ethical principles when considering the importance of living things and their value in life. In the assessment of models of moral status, different theorists advance that life is equal regardless of the individuals’ situations. Present theories consider various levels of assessment on moral standing (Pardo, 2018). In this case study, the paper examines the moral status of a deformed fetus and the moral choices that the individuals involved make based on the Christian worldview. The paper also presents the author’s position on the kind of theories that determine the decisions made by those involved in the case.

Christian Worldview

According to the Christian worldview, human beings have full moral status by virtue of being humans right from conception. Christians advance that human beings are created in God’s image and likeness and have inherent right to life irrespective of any disabilities or deformities that they may possess. The Christian worldview is founded on the biblical and Christian teaching that God is the creator and author of morality and moral regulations (Beckwith & Thornton, 2020). As such, life is sacred and should be protected. No one has a right to take away life even when in the worst situation.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: CASE STUDY ON MORAL STATUS PHI 413  

Christian worldview is compatible with the theory of moral standing which is founded on human properties. The moral status model is a religious as well as philosophical perspective that illustrated the essence of humanity and the need to understand that people are superior to other living organisms. The moral status theory asserts that human beings have moral status among all other living organism that were created to serve their interests (Brown, 2018). The theoretical model advances that during conception, all human beings get full moral standing. This implication that the Christian and philosophical model is founded on human aspects which means that a fetus has same moral status just like a grown up human with all cognitive functions in place. These realizations are associated with the intrinsic human value and dignity as full moral status occurs during conception. The implication is that equal moral status is intrinsic and humans get the moral ability because their lives are sacred.

Theories Demonstrated by Jessica, Marco, Maria and Dr. Wilson

The case study is about a fetus that is deformed and has high possibility of suffering from Down Syndrome. If born successfully, the new born will have increased possibility of suffering from mental health issues and other significant challenges as a result of cognitive deficiencies. The four people in the case study includes Jessica the expectant women with the deformed fetus, Marco, who is Jessica’s husband, and Maria, Jessica’s aunt (GCU, n.d). The fourth person is Dr. Wilson, a physician who is trying to give the family possible options and their effects on their lives. These four individuals have different ways of looking at the situation and various theories concerning the moral status of the fetus.

Jessica is experiencing a moral dilemma about her beliefs and the eventual circumstance of the child if she keeps the fetus to full-term pregnancy. Jessica understands the financial burden and health complications that the child will create on the family. At the same time, her religious beliefs are core to any decision that she would make. Her religious beliefs oppose the termination of the fetus or abortion. Jessica is a moral agent that implores her to make the most effective decisions. The approach demonstrates that Jessica is following the moral agency as she will decide the moral status of the unborn baby. Again, her decision is influenced by her religious beliefs since she is a Christian (Beckwith & Thornton, 2020). According to her aunt, Jessica has a relationship with the fetus by virtue of being its mother and should only act in its best interests. Jessica and her aunt, Maria demonstrate the religious theory of moral status founded on human properties. Both advance that human beings have full moral status right from conception despite their mental and physical deficiencies. Maria tells Jessica to consider her duties as a mother to the child and respect God’s will. Jessica is the fetus’s mother and a believer. These relationships provide the fetus a moral status which makes termination wrong. Both Jessica and her aunt Maria illustrate the divine command theory that is based on God being the creator and basis of morality.

On his part, Marco is worried about the expected burden of having a child with disabilities but is ready and willing to support Jessica irrespective of the decision that she makes. Marco believes that whatever decision Jessica makes is critical and based on her appreciation of the moral nature of the child. therefore, Marco shows relationship theory as the moral status of the fetus can change based on the decision that Jessica makes. Dr. Wilson provide critical medical advice and possible options for the family. However, he shows significant support for termination of the fetus based on his medical knowledge and the disabilities that it will possess. Dr. Wilson utilizes the cognitive properties’ model which asserts that the moral standing of any person is based on their ability to show and possess certain level of awareness and logic. In this case, the fetus does not possess these attributes and lacks the moral status (Brown, 2018). As such, the physician believes that the Jessica should terminate the fetus.

Influence on Determination of Each Recommended Decisions

Theories affect the recommendations as they base their positions on different ground. For example, Dr. Wilson uses a utilitarian approach which allows him to provide various choices to the family. However, Marco shows relationship theory where his decisions will be based on the choices that his wife, Jessica, makes. Marco makes decision based on his relationship with Jessica and the fetus. He also considers the financial and health burden of the unborn fetus. Jessica’s relationship with the fetus and her capability as a moral agent to make decisions affect her overall decisions in this case (Pardo, 2018). Jessica must consider the impact of her decisions on her moral perspective and religious background. Maria shows both relationship theory and divine command perspective as she encourages Jessica to factor in her relationship with the fetus and God.

Position

I think that the moral status of the fetus should be founded solely on the Christian worldview about the sanctity of life. In this case, the fetus has a moral standing. However, it is essential to consider the quality of life that the newborn will live, especially with the permanent condition of Down Syndrome. Therefore, Jessica requires sufficient support and effective interventions that could assist her have a healthy baby than terminating the pregnancy (Pardo, 2018). These interventions should consider how she can raise the child better irrespective of its condition. life is sacred and God’s gift. However, medical experts should improve the health of the child.

Conclusion

Moral status of unborn child is similar to a grown up person. In this case, the fetus has a moral standing based on the moral theory. The fetus may have deformities but the mother should be supported to make an effective decision. As demonstrated, the mother faces moral dilemma based on the financial burden of the child and her religious beliefs.

References

Beckwith, F., & Thornton, A. K. (2020). Moral status and the architects of principlism.

The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy: A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine, 45(4-5): 504-520.

Brown, M. K. (2018). The Moral Status of the Human Embryo. The Journal of Medicine and

Philosophy: A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine, 43(2): 132–158, https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jhx035

Grand Canyon University (GCU) (n.d). Case Study: Fetal Abnormality.

Pardo, R. (2018). The Moral Status of the Embryo from the Standpoint of Social Perceptions. In

Clinical Ethics at the Crossroads of Genetic and Reproductive Technologies (pp. 149-193). Academic Press.

Assessment Description

Based on “Case Study: Fetal Abnormality” and the required topic Resources, write a 750-1,000-word reflection that answers the following questions:

1. What is the Christian view of the nature of human persons, and which theory of moral status is it compatible with? How is this related to the intrinsic human value and dignity?
2. Which theory or theories are being used by Jessica, Marco, Maria, and Dr. Wilson to determine the moral status of the fetus? What from the case study specifically leads you to believe that they hold the theory you selected?
3. How does the theory determine or influence each of their recommendations for action?
4. What theory do you agree with? Why? How would that theory determine or influence the recommendation for action?

Remember to support your responses with the topic Resources.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Case Study on Moral Status SAMPLE 2

Healthcare providers make numerous ethical decisions when dealing with patients. Providers follow institutionalized approaches in making fast decisions concerning care based on the worldview that patients are using or accept to guide them in such situations. While providers have ethical principles based on the medical ethics and code of conduct and base their decisions on scientific evidence as well as compatible ethical theories, they must consider patients’ approached to ethics and their ability to make moral decisions (Beckwith & Thornton, 2020). The purpose of this paper is to offer a reflection about a case related to ethics and the theories that individuals in the case use related to the moral status of human beings.

Christian View of the Nature of Human Person and Compatible Theory

The Christians believe that human persons are God’s special creation as He created them in his image based on the concept of “Imago Dei.” Christians advance that each living human being has a spirit and this is the primary reason why they deserve dignity and respect (Müller, 2020). The implication is that an individual’s identity is an outcome of being a person and not the acts of one’s acts of consciousness, intelligence and freedom. Human beings have the inherent dignity as individuals and should be respected. For Christians, life is a sacred gift from God and begins at conception and should be respected.

The Christian view of the nature of human persons is compatible with the cognitive properties theory. According to this theory, all individuals, including the fetus in the womb after conception, possess cognition that consists of memory, perception, awareness, understanding and logic. Christians consider human beings as possessing self-awareness, implying that they understand the present, past, and can predict or hope for a better future (Beckwith & Thornton, 2020). The cognitive properties model asserts that individuals have inherent freedom and free will to make any decision and the capacity to participate in purposeful deeds. Therefore, the model is related to inherent human value and dignity as it shows that human beings are superior creations.

Theories Being Used in Determination of the Moral Status of the Fetus

The different individuals in the case study use diverse theories in determining the moral status of Jessica’s unborn child. Jessica and her Aunt employ a variety of theories based on the gender as women and their belief as Christians. Imperatively, Maria has a Christian view of the moral status of a human being and believes that all life is sacred (Milliken, 2018). Consequently, she advances that Jessica has a responsibility before God to carry the pregnancy irrespective of the nature of the child that will be born.

 Maria uses human properties theory which values humans because of the intrinsic value that they possess. The fetus has genetic code of its parents and abortion or termination should be considered as murder. Jessica employs the moral agency theory and relational theory as she must make a decision to determine the moral status of the fetus (Brown, 2018). She demonstrates intrapersonal conflict as she is in a dilemma on which moral status theory to use in determining the fetus’s moral status. Jessica’s relationship as the mother of the child also complicates the situation as she must consider her obligations as insisted by her aunt. She must also know that she has obligations before God who has entrusted her with the pregnancy.

Doctor Wilson advances the theory of cognitive properties which suggests that for something or someone to have moral status, they must demonstrate cognition and high levels of awareness and rationality. However, at its age, the fetus lacks these abilities and can be terminated according to the physician. The doctor also holds this view as he informs the family about each possible solution to the issue (Surovell, 2018). Marco, Jessica’s husband holds the relational theory as he advances that he will support whatever decision that she makes in the case. Marco also agrees with Dr. Wilson and views as well as places the larger value on the future of the child (Milliken, 2018). For instance, he considers the economic hardship that the child will create and how they will manage it. Marco is ready for any decision that his wife will make concerning the fetus as he acknowledges the right of the expectant mother to make decisions about her health, her body and the unborn baby.

Theories  Determining or Influencing Their Recommendations

The relationship theory and the moral agency model influence both Marco and Jessica in this case. Marco employs these theories since Jessica has the ultimate final decision. Further, relationship theory influences Maria’s view about the determination of the pregnancy as she asserts that it is wrong and persuades Jessica to maintain as the mother of the unborn child based on her belief in God. The theory of cognitive properties influences Dr. Wilson as he stresses the benefits of terminating the pregnancy for Jessica (Brown, 2018). The theory is based on scientific evidence and associated aspects.

Theory in Agreement & Influence on Recommended Action

The theory that I agree with concerning the moral status of human being is one advanced by Maria, the relationship model. While it is true based on the cognitive properties that a human being attains moral status because of cognition, the Christian view is different and having a relationship with the fetus, Jessica should not terminate the pregnancy (Surovell, 2018). The theory would impact my recommendation by suggesting the Jessica should weigh her obligation as a mother and human being before making any decision. While she may opt for termination of the pregnancy, she must consider the psychological effects that it constitutes in the final analysis.

Conclusion

The Christian nature of human persons is explicit that they are created in God’s image and have intrinsic value, right from conception. The view aligns with the cognitive properties theory and any decision concerning termination of life should be weighed against these moral values. The case study shows the people use different theories to determine the moral status of human beings, including unborn children or fetuses.

References

Beckwith, F., & Thornton, A. K. (2020). Moral status and the architects of principlism.  

The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy: A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine, 45(4-5): 504-520). https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jhaa019

Brown, M. T. (2018). The moral status of the human embryo. The Journal of Medicine and

Philosophy: A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine, 43(2): 132-158). https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jhx035

Milliken, A. (2018). Refining moral agency: Insights from moral psychology and moral

            philosophy. Nursing Philosophy, 19(1), e12185. https://doi.org/10.1111/nup.12185

Müller, S. (2020). Concepts and dimensions of human dignity in the Christian tradition.

Interdisciplinary Journal for Religion and Transformation in Contemporary Society, 6(1), 22-55. https://brill.com/view/journals/jrat/6/1/article-p22_3.xml

Surovell, J. (2018). But for the Grace of God: Abortion and Cognitive Disability, Luck and

Moral Status. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 20(2), 257–277. http://www.jstor.org/stable/44955509

A Sample Answer 2 For the Assignment: CASE STUDY ON MORAL STATUS PHI 413

Title:  CASE STUDY ON MORAL STATUS PHI 413

One of the more significant questions in ethics and health care is the question of personhood. Who is classified as a person who is worthy of moral consideration? At first glance, the answer to this question seems obvious. Everyone is a person worthy of moral consideration. If you are a human being, then you really matter.

While this answer seems obvious enough, philosophers such as David Hume, Ludwig Wittgenstein, Immanuel Kant, and John Searle have all over nuanced perspectives on who is considered a person (White, 2020). Kant, for example, argued that a human person is one who is able to reason autonomously (Kant, 1785). By this, he meant that a person is someone who is able to make rational decisions. This distinction separates one’s desires from one’s ability to reason. Desires, according to Kant, are part of the body–they cannot be controlled. Reason, on the other hand, is part of the mind. Reasons is therefore controlled by our will and is free. When you are free to think and make decisions, then you are a person.

Kant’s conception of a person has a dramatic effect on how we view various issues in health care. One example is the issue of euthanasia and/or assisted suicide. According to Kant’s criteria, euthanasia and assisted suicide would be wrong if you are not treating persons as intrinsically valuable. By this, he meant that you should not let one’s desires determine whether you should end a life, since desires are part of the human body and thus not under the control of the will. Moral decisions in health care should start with the intrinsic value of the person, because persons hold supreme value for Kant.

That said, Kant’s theory might also suggest that euthanasia and assisted suicide are morally acceptable if a patient has suffered irreversible brain damage, resulting in no brain activity. In such a scenario, the patient is not considered a person with a free will to make rational decisions, and therefore euthanasia and assisted suicide might be considered morally justified.

So how does all this relate to the Christian conception of the imago Dei? For Christians, all human beings are made in the image of God, and therefore all human beings have equal worth (White, 2020). Recognizing this fact does not remove the need for careful moral reasoning when it comes to issues related to health care, nor does it solve complicated dilemmas related to end-of-life issues. It does, however, provide a clarifying principle–namely, we should not dismiss a human being as lacking moral worth simply because they do not fit our definition of a person. After all, Kant might be wrong about his definition of a person (just as the other philosophers might be wrong). Because of this, the Christian worldview arguably starts at the safest place when it comes to defining the human person. If all humans are created in the image of God, then we must treat every human as intrinsically valuable. This principle is relevant for how we think about issues related to disabilities, abortion, assisted reproductive technologies, any medical research conducted on human beings, and countless other issues.