Benchmark – Community Teaching Plan: Community

Benchmark – Community Teaching Plan: Community Presentation Assignment

Implicit racial bias is ubiquitous in the U.S. healthcare system, and it results in disparities in quality patient care. You raised a good point on the stereotypes that African American pregnant women face in the clinical setting. Apart from this, Black youth and their families are also affected by systemic racism and social determinants of health (Lang et al., 2022). These impacts are multifactorial and may represent generations of cumulative impact. Clinicians should maintain a posture of humility as they learn more about the experiences of Black patients and keep an awareness of both (Lang et al., 2022).

Reference:

Lang, Q., Roberson-Moore, T., Rogers, K. M., & Wilson, W. E., Jr (2022). Cultural Considerations in Working with Black and African American Youth. Child and adolescent psychiatric clinics of North America, 31(4), 733–744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chc.2022.05.003

Note: This is an individual assignment. Based on the feedback offered by the provider, identify the best approach for teaching. Prepare a presentation to accompany the teaching plan and present the information to your community. Select one of the following options for delivery of the presentation:

Struggling to Meet Your Deadline?

Get your assignment on Benchmark – Community Teaching Plan: Community Presentation Assignment done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!

Meet my deadline

PowerPoint presentation – no more than 30 minutes
Pamphlet presentation – 1 to 2 pages
Poster presentation

Appropriate community settings include:

Public health clinic
Community health center
Long-term care facility
Transitional care facility
Home health center
University/School health center
Church community
Adult/Child care center

Before presenting information to the community, seek approval from an agency administrator or representative.

Upon receiving approval from the agency, include the “Community Teaching Experience Form” as part of your assignment submission.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

NRS-427V-RS-CommunityTeachingExperienceForm.doc

Thank you so much Tammy for your response to my discussion question. I was impressed by the initiative undertaken by your hospital to address the needs and concerns of the LGBTQ community is truly commendable. It’s heartening to see that your institution is taking tangible steps to create an inclusive and welcoming environment for everyone, regardless of their sexual orientation or gender identity. The campaign’s emphasis on education is particularly noteworthy, as it addresses the often deep-seated biases and stereotypes that can unintentionally perpetuate discrimination. By providing education, you are fostering a more understanding and compassionate workforce, which can only lead to better patient care.

Your point about the banners is valid. While the intention behind prominently displaying LGBTQ flags and messages of acceptance is undoubtedly positive, there is a need to balance the visibility of this specific community with the broader principle of inclusivity. However, I do feel that there is a need to make space and highlight groups that have been marginalized or overtly discriminated against. In doing so, it sends a message to the community that we are recognizing this group of people and moving forward towards a more inclusive and accepting role. Opting for a more universally welcoming message, such as “Welcome to your community hospital, we accept everyone with respect and compassion,” will also help create an environment where all patients and visitors feel equally valued.

One publication that I found written by Britany Bass and Hassan Nagy (2022), “Cultural Competence in the Care of LGBTQ Patients” that supports this point of view. The article expresses the importance for all health care providers to interact with the LGBTQ community is a positive manner, with understanding and equipped with the knowledge of understanding their unique health concerns, associated needs and challenges, risks factors that they face, and the understanding on how to properly communicate with them in order to provide an equal level of compassionate care. I feel like it is especially important to that you highlighted the concern that the LGBTQ community is faced with and the higher rate of discrimination, and challenges of obtaining equal access to essential healthcare. This is especially true in the political environment that we are in today. Thank you again for your post.

Work Cited:

Bass B, Nagy H. (2022) Cultural Competence in the Care of LGBTQ Patients. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK563176/

Benchmark – Community Teaching Plan: Community Presentation – Rubric

Presentation Based on Teaching Work Plan and Provider Feedback

Criteria Description

Presentation Based on Teaching Work Plan and Provider Feedback

5. Excellent

24 points

Presentation is clearly based on Teaching Work Plan and any documented provider feedback. All aspects are consistent with Teaching Work Plan.

4. Good

20.4 points

Presentation is based on Teaching Work Plan and any documented provider feedback. All aspects are generally consistent with Teaching Work Plan.

3. Satisfactory

18 points

Presentation is generally based on Teaching Work Plan and any documented provider feedback. Some aspects are unclear. There are minor inconsistencies with Teaching Work Plan.

2. Less than Satisfactory

15.6 points

Presentation partially based on a Teaching Work Plan. Documented provider feedback is not integrated. Major aspects are incomplete. More information is needed.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Presentation is not based on a Teaching Work Plan.

Teaching Work Plan and Provider Feedback Provides Education to Diverse Patient Population (B)

Criteria Description

Presentation Based on Teaching Work Plan and Provider Feedback Presentation Provides Individualized Education to Diverse Patient Population in Appropriate Community Setting (C3.3)

5. Excellent

24 points

Presentation provides specific information that focuses on the identified population and includes all diverse attributes for that population. Presentation is highly relevant to the community setting chosen. Additional health care settings where this individual education plan could be used are identified and highly relevant. The presentation demonstrates insight into providing individual education to diverse patient populations.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: Benchmark – Community Teaching Plan: Community Presentation Assignment

4. Good

20.4 points

Presentation provides information for the identified population and includes many diverse attributes for that population. Presentation is pertinent to the community setting chosen. Some additional health care settings where this individual education plan could be used are proposed. Some detail is needed for clarity.

3. Satisfactory

18 points

Presentation provides general information for the identified population. Some diverse attributes for that population are presented. Presentation is appropriate to the community setting chosen. At least one health care setting where this individual education plan could be used has been proposed. There are some inaccuracies. Minor detail or rationale is needed for support.

2. Less than Satisfactory

15.6 points

Presentation is incomplete. Significant information for the identified population is omitted or unclear. Some diverse attributes for that population are presented; not all attributes are relevant to the population. The presentation does not seem appropriate for the health care setting. There are major inaccuracies. More information is needed.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Presentation does not include individualized education to a diverse patient population in an appropriate community setting.

Presentation of Content

Criteria Description

Presentation of Content

5. Excellent

48 points

The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.

4. Good

40.8 points

The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Includes persuasive information from reliable sources.

3. Satisfactory

36 points

The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other.

2. Less than Satisfactory

31.2 points

The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose. Includes some persuasive information.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information. Includes little persuasive information. Sequencing of ideas is unclear.

Layout

Criteria Description

Layout

5. Excellent

6 points

The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text.

4. Good

5.1 points

The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text.

3. Satisfactory

4.5 points

The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability.

2. Less than Satisfactory

3.9 points

The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident.

Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.)

Criteria Description

Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.)

5. Excellent

6 points

The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.

4. Good

5.1 points

The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly.

3. Satisfactory

4.5 points

Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part.

2. Less than Satisfactory

3.9 points

Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately.

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

Criteria Description

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

5. Excellent

6 points

Writer is clearly in control of standard, written, academic English.

4. Good

5.1 points

Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present.

3. Satisfactory

4.5 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader.

2. Less than Satisfactory

3.9 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.

Documentation of Sources

Criteria Description

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

5. Excellent

6 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

4. Good

5.1 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

3. Satisfactory

4.5 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

2. Less than Satisfactory

3.9 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Sources are not documented.

Total 120 points