Assignment Critique Of Quantitative And Qualitative Articles
Walden University Assignment Critique Of Quantitative And Qualitative Articles-Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Walden University Assignment Critique Of Quantitative And Qualitative Articles assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for Assignment Critique Of Quantitative And Qualitative Articles
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Walden University Assignment Critique Of Quantitative And Qualitative Articles depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for Assignment Critique Of Quantitative And Qualitative Articles
The introduction for the Walden University Assignment Critique Of Quantitative And Qualitative Articles is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

Struggling to Meet Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on Assignment Critique Of Quantitative And Qualitative Articles done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!
How to Write the Body for Assignment Critique Of Quantitative And Qualitative Articles
After the introduction, move into the main part of the Assignment Critique Of Quantitative And Qualitative Articles assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for Assignment Critique Of Quantitative And Qualitative Articles
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for Assignment Critique Of Quantitative And Qualitative Articles
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the Assignment Critique Of Quantitative And Qualitative Articles assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
Assignment Critique Of Quantitative And Qualitative Articles
Assignment: Critique of Quantitative and Qualitative Articles
The DNP project topic under consideration is “effectiveness of case management for patients with chronic diseases.” Some of the diseases in this case include conditions lasting more than one year and require continuous medical attention (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 2022). They include diabetes, cancer, and heart disease and significantly limit the patient’s ability to manage activities of daily living. The quantitative article that relates to the DNP topic is:
Davis, K. M., Eckert, M. C., Hutchinson, A., Harmon, J., Sharplin, G., Shakib, S., & Caughey, G. E. (2021). Effectiveness of nurse–led services for people with chronic disease in achieving an outcome of continuity of care at the primary-secondary healthcare interface: A quantitative systematic review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 121, 103986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2021.103986
A Summary of How the Article Relates to Your Potential DNP Project Topic
According to the article, there is evidence that nurse-led services can improve the continuity of care for people with chronic disease, especially at the primary-secondary healthcare interface. A study in the United Kingdom found that patients who saw the same nurse over time had better continuity of care and communication, and improved health outcomes. Another study found that nurses who provided more coordinated care had lower hospitalization rates and improved patient satisfaction. There are a number of factors that contribute to the effectiveness of nurse-led services for people with chronic disease. Firstly, nursing staff need to have access to comprehensive information about their patients’ medical histories in order to provide appropriate care. Secondly, there needs to be good communication between all members of the healthcare team.
The article relates to the DNP project, first, it identifies or determine the effectiveness of nurse-led services for individual with chronic diseases in achieving the outcome of continuity of care at both the primary and secondary healthcare interface. Secondly, the approaches and the objectives of this quantitative article align with the topic’s objectives. Finally, the article focuses on the effectiveness of case management for patients with chronic diseases, this provides elaborate and comprehensive information that can be applied in the DNP project.
The Search Terms and the filters Used
Some of the search terms applied in search of the article include: effectiveness of case management for patients, chronic diseases, effectiveness in the management of chronic diseases, patient managements, and the management of chronic disease. The methodological search filters were used to accurately determine the article, some of the methodological filters used include type of the article, quantitative, the study type, and the topic for research.
The Method Used in Reviewing Search Results
The process of reviewing search results is an important step in ensuring accuracy and completeness. When reviewing search results, it is important to consider various factors such as date, source, relevance, and quality. -Date: The date of the result is an important factor to consider when reviewing accuracy. A result that is outdated may no longer be accurate. For example, a search for “restaurants near me” may bring up different results if the search is conducted on a different day. -Source: The source of the result also affects its accuracy. A result from a credible source is more likely to be accurate than one from an unknown or untrustworthy source.
Reference
CDC. (2022). About chronic diseases. https://www.cdc.gov/chronicdisease/about/index.htm#:~:text=Chronic%20diseases%20are%20defined%20broadly,disability%20in%20the%20United%20States.
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS Assignment: Critique of Quantitative and Qualitative Articles:
Critique of Research Studies Instructions
Directions:
Complete a critique of the quantitative and qualitative articles listed below and are provided – Please use APA format and page numbers.
- Romeo, E. M. (2010). Quantitative Research on Critical Thinking and Predicting Nursing Students’ NCLEX-RN Performance. Journal of Nursing Education. Vol 49, No. 7. Assignment: Critique of Quantitative and Qualitative Articles
- Martin, J.M., Olano-Lizárraga, M & Saracibar-Razquin, M. (2016). The Experience of Family Caregivers Caring for a Terminal Patient at Home: A Research Review. International Journal of Nursing Studies 64: 1-12
ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPERS
This assignment will be completed in three parts. Refer to the information below as a guide to the information that should be included in each part.
Follow the guidelines for the quantitative and qualitative article (that I have provided) critiques in Box 5.2: Guide to an Overall Critique of a Quantitative Research Report, and Box 5.3: Guide to an Overall Critique of a Qualitative Research Report, in Chapter 5 of the Nursing Research: Generating and Assessing Evidence for Nursing Practice textbook. (Book provided)
- Utilize a central heading to indicate that what follows is the critique of the articles.
- The side headings of the critique for each article should follow the headings in Box 5.2 and Box 5.3 in Chapter 5 of the Nursing Research: Generating and Assessing Evidence for Nursing Practice textbook.
- Note that within these basic guidelines, there are additional references to Detailed Critiquing Guidelines found in additional boxes in other chapters of the Nursing Research: Generating and Assessing Evidence for Nursing Practice textbook focused on the various elements of a research study report. Use these to expand the research study and to learn specific terminology appropriate to the critique of research.
When turning in the final submission, please put the elements in the following order: Quantitative Article Critique, Qualitative Article Critique, References (which should include the two articles, the text, and any other additional sources).
Critique of Research Studies – Part 1: Due Topic 4
For Part 1 of the critique, focus only on the following segments for each article:
Quantitative (500 words) | ||||||||
|
||||||||
|
This assignment uses a rubric listed below:
Rubric
Critique thoroughly addresses all guidelines and criteria for the quantitative research title and abstract. Critique is supported with relevant evidence.
Critique thoroughly addresses all guidelines and criteria for each of the quantitative research introduction components. Critique is supported with relevant evidence.
Critique thoroughly addresses all guidelines and criteria for the qualitative research title and abstract. Critique is supported with relevant evidence.
Critique thoroughly addresses all guidelines and criteria for each of the qualitative research introduction components. Critique is supported with relevant evidence.
The writer is clearly in command of standard, written academic English.
All format elements are correct.
In-text citations and a reference page are complete with page number. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.
UNFORMATTED ATTACHMENT PREVIEW

Don’t wait until the last minute
Fill in your requirements and let our experts deliver your work asap.