ASPEN HCA320 Healthcare Policy and Economics Module 1 Assignment
ASPEN HCA320 Healthcare Policy and Economics Module 1 Assignment
ASPEN HCA320 Healthcare Policy and Economics Module 1 Assignment
Module 1 Assignment
Remember to submit your work following the file naming convention FirstInitial.LastName_M01.docx. For example, J.Smith_M01.docx. Remember that it is not necessary to manually type in the file extension; it will automatically append.
Start by reading and following these instructions:
Quickly skim the questions or assignment below and the assignment rubric to help you focus.
Read the required chapter(s) of the textbook and any additional recommended resources. Some answers may require you to do additional research on the Internet or in other reference sources. Choose your sources carefully.

Struggling to Meet Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on ASPEN HCA320 Healthcare Policy and Economics Module 1 Assignment done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!
Consider the course discussions so far and any insights gained from it.
Create your Assignment submission and be sure to cite your sources if needed, use APA style as required, and check your spelling.
Assignment:
Population Health Advocacy
Human trafficking, extreme poverty, preventable diseases, the opioid crisis and the lack of adequate low-income housing are a few current societal concerns worthy of social change. Nurses and healthcare leaders are in a good position to shape and influence health care policy.
Think of a cause you believe in strongly. Access the website of your elected officials either at the local, state, or federal level using the following link: https://www.usa.gov/elected-officials/ or use the website of your choice. Explore some of the issues and committees your legislators are involved in and select at least one that interest you or align with your beliefs. You may also contact your legislator’s office and speak to his or her legislative assistant by calling the U.S. Capitol switchboard operator at (202) 224-3121 for the Senate and (202) 225-3121 for the House. Legislator assistants are very knowledgeable about the legislator’s agenda and can provide a wealth of information.
This assignment will be at least 1500 words or more. This Modulereflect on advocacy, collaborative partnerships with other health care practitioners and stakeholders, and the policy making process and write a paper that addresses the following:
Describe the policy issue, policy problem of interest or a particular bill that your legislator has introduced
Elaborate on why the policy matters and what you can possibly do to strengthen the policy?
Briefly define the role you would play as an advocate for the healthcare consumer and healthcare professionals.
Explain how the policy impacts the public at large or a particular population.
What stakeholders would you collaborate with to promote the cause?
Assignment Expectations
Length: 1500-2000 words in length
Structure: Include a title page and reference page in APA format. These do not count towards the minimal word amount for this assignment. Your essay must include an introduction and a conclusion.
References: Use the appropriate APA style in-text citations and references for all resources utilized to answer the questions. A minimum of two (2) scholarly sources are required for this assignment.
Format: Save your assignment as a Microsoft Word document (.doc or .docx).
File name: Name your saved file according to your first initial, last name, and the module number (for example, “RHall Module 1.docx”)
Submission: Submit to the D2L dropbox for grading
M1 Assignment UMBO – 2, 3, 4
M1 Assignment PLG – 2, 4, 5
M1 Assignment CLO – 3, 5, 7
Grading Rubric
Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.
Essay/Paper Rubric | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Criteria | Ratings | Points | |||
Identification of Main Issues/Problems | Distinguished – 4 points Identify and demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the issues/problems. |
Excellent – 3 points Identifies and demonstrate an accomplished understanding of most of issues/problems. |
Fair – 2 points Identifies and demonstrate an acceptable understanding of most of issues/problems. |
Poor – 1 point Identifies and demonstrate an unacceptable understanding of most of issues/problems. |
4 points |
Analysis and Evaluation of Issues/Problems | Distinguished – 4 points Presents an insightful, thorough analysis and evaluation of issues/problems. |
Excellent – 3 points Presents a thorough analysis and evaluation of most of the issues/problems. |
Fair – 2 points Presents a superficial or incomplete analysis and evaluation of issues/problems. |
Poor – 1 point Presents unacceptable analysis and evaluation of issues/problems. |
4 points |
Demonstrates a Conceptual Understanding | Distinguished – 4 points Provides a thorough, competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a high level of conceptual understanding. |
Excellent – 3 points Provides a competent and interpretive responses to all issues/problems, and shows a moderate level of conceptual understanding. |
Fair – 2 points Provides a competent responses to all issues/problems, but lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding. |
Poor – 1 point Provides an unacceptable response to all issues/problems, and lacks interpretation and a moderate level of conceptual understanding. |
4 points |
Use of Citations to Course Readings and Additional Research/Literature | Distinguished – 4 points Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and extended referencing. |
Excellent – 3 points Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing. |
Fair – 2 points Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing. |
Poor – 1 point Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing. |
4 points |
Writing Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines | Distinguished – 4 points Demonstrate a high level of clarity, precision, and attention to detail. APA style is correct and writing is free of grammar and spelling errors. |
Excellent – 3 points Demonstrate a high level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail. |
Fair – 2 points Demonstrate a moderate level of clarity. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail. |
Poor – 1 point Demonstrates issues in writing and communicating clearly. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention. |
4 points |
Total Points | 20 |

Don’t wait until the last minute
Fill in your requirements and let our experts deliver your work asap.