Worldview Analysis And Personal Inventory

Worldview Analysis And Personal Inventory

https://www.onlinenursingessays.com/worldview-analysis-and-personal-inventory-2/

Worldview Analysis and Personal Inventory

Worldviews offer healthcare provides, particularly nurses, perspectives and philosophies that enhance care provision. Healthcare practitioners should understand the different worldviews to define their approaches and attitudes to patient care provision. These perspectives are also essential in understanding patients and enhancing cultural competency levels (Iserson, 2020). The essence of this paper is to explore personal perspectives or worldviews and their effects on care delivery based on specific concepts.

Christian Perspective and Postmodern Relativism

Christianity provides a religious and theological approach to ethics and spirituality. Christians advance that spirituality is theological and religious aspects that explain the concept of God as the author of

PHI-413 Worldview Analysis And Personal Inventory

ethical and moral behaviors. Christianity perceives God as eternal and all-powerful, while the Bible teaches how people should live ethically (Rieg et al., 2018). The implication is that ethics and spirituality are connected as spiritual persons conduct themselves morally and ethically. They reduce harm and focus on providing benefits to the majority. Ethical conduct shows that one loves God and his neighbor and cannot harm but offer love to all (Iserson, 2020). The Christian perspective of spirituality and ethics influences healthcare by providing boundaries on how providers should make decisions, especially when they encounter dilemmas. Healthcare providers should understand that providing care requires ethical consideration and spirituality, especially the attainment of culturally competent care for patients.

Postmodern relativism offers a more liberal appreciation of spirituality and ethics by advancing that no absolute truth exists. Postmodern relativists do not believe in the existence of a divine being like God who directs and expects moral conduct from people based on set laws. According to the perspective, each individual can form a truth about their positions on moral issues (Lynch, 2018). Despite its contradictory nature, postmodern relativism is essential in healthcare as it accepts the existence of different perspectives that providers can use to offer care by appreciating diversity. Therefore, healthcare providers cannot assert a monopoly over truth and ethical perspectives but be accommodative, knowing that diversity exists based on moral and religious perspectives. Providers should not consider some cultures better than others.

Scientism and Arguments Against It

Scientism advances that the only reliable way to attain truth is using complex scientific methods or sciences. The perspective identifies hard sciences as subjects that use experiments and laws to coin truth about certain phenomena in the world. Scientism is incompatible with the Christian worldview. It dismisses other sources of knowledge and understanding as inadequate since they have no scientific proof and are not founded on hard evidence from research. Scientism does not accept the Christian worldview that God created the world (Gasparatou, 2017). Instead, it argues that most claims about knowledge and truth are individuals’ false statements and mere opinions. The model proposes that any truth should be supported by scientific evidence rather than assumptions founded on unique individual experiences.

Conversely, there are arguments advanced about scientism that are essential to discuss. There are realities where scientism fails to provide sufficient evidence to support its claims, especially its reliability. The first argument is that hard sciences do not provide absolute truths and facts as they are restructured by the present understanding of the environment and measuring tools. Aspects considered absolute truths in hard sciences do not undergo changes based on new information (Moreland, 2018). The implication is that scientism is a self-reputing concept that does not embrace changes or integrate new information to form novel perspectives based on existing situations. Secondly, scientism adopts a tyrannical approach over-dependent on rationalism but ignores personal opinion. Tyrannical approaches stifle willful thought, which is essential in exploring new information, yet this is the most critical aspect of advancing science. The implication is that scientism is not the only absolute way of knowing the truth and fails reliability tests since it does not accept scrutiny or develop alternative ways of assessing real issues.

Personal Perspective and Worldview

a). Ultimate Reality

My perspective as a Christian is that the ultimate reality entails acknowledging a superior being capable of understanding all aspects of nature and shaping the destiny of all beings on earth and in the universe. The environment that I live in, the challenges that humanity faces, and the need for hope, faith, and trust demonstrates that the ultimate reality comes from understanding the diversity in nature and celebrating it for the benefit of humanity (Song & Isaacson, 2018). Therefore, the ultimate reality implores one to appreciate existing truths and seek effective ways to live in harmony for their final destination in the universe.

b). Nature of the Universe

My perspective about the nature of the universe is that God created it and still controls every aspect of its existence. The beauty of nature demonstrates the love of God and the need for Him to show perfection. God’s plan is accomplished through the beautiful universe He created for humanity. Competition involving human beings and other creatures illustrates the need for all to value their lives and live for one another. While one will argue that competition allows the removal of components which cannot survive, God created the universe for the survival of all (Song & Isaacson, 2018). The universe does not exist for the few who are strong but for both the robust and the weak. Adverse events like natural disasters are out of greed by human beings to exploit God’s resources with no concern for others.

c). What is a Human Being?

My worldview advances that human beings are created in the image of God and should be treated equally. Human beings are born free and should enjoy the inherent freedom, make choices of free will, and pursue what pleasures them as long as they do not conflict with the lives of others (Lynch, 2018). However, a fundamental aspect that distinguishes human beings from other creators is that they possess knowledge, have virtues, and inherent love despite the wickedness that occurs, subconsciously (Mason, 2019). The higher intelligence levels allow human beings to develop complex systems, languages, and technologies to enhance their span on earth.

d). knowledge

Knowledge entails unique facts, information and skills, expertise, and training that one cognitively acquires from experience and education. Experience is practicing to familiarize with certain aspects of knowledge. Education involves attending formal and informal processes based on theories and training to attain knowledge. The implication is that knowledge allows one to possess the capacity to make effective and informed choices and decisions (Lynch, 2018). Knowledge allows one to be an expert and professional in specific fields like nursing and engineering. Nurses acquire knowledge through enrolment for different programs and levels, from bachelor’s degree to master’s and even Ph.D.

e). Basis of Ethics

My basis of ethics entails personal beliefs, convictions, and awareness to determine and discern what is morally right or wrong. I acquired my ethics based on teaching from my environment, my family and community, and professional, ethical expectations as a nurse. The second foundation of my ethics is existing general principles and beliefs, mainly based on my religious philosophy as a Christian. For instance, professional ethics implores nurses to have confidentiality and treat patient information privately. Healthcare providers should make ethical principles the basis of their decisions when offering care to patients.

f). Purpose of My Existence

Human beings are co-creators with God and should procreate and protect His creations. Therefore, my initial purpose is to ensure that I promote God’s work of creation in all aspects, particularly as a nurse, to offer the best care to patients (Stenmark et al., 2018). My existence should help those significant to me and the entire universe through changing the world in small yet critical ways in my community.

Conclusion

Personal perspectives are essential for nurses to create care philosophies and provide patient-centered care. Understanding different worldviews allow nurses to develop better therapeutic interactions with patients and enhance overall care quality, especially outcomes.  As demonstrated, aspects like ultimate reality, the purpose of one’s existence, and knowledge are critical in formulating perspectives that benefit patients and other providers.

 Due Date: Mar 03, 2019 23:59:59       Max Points: 100

Details:

Based on the required topic study materials, write a reflection about worldview and respond to following:

  1. In 250-300 words, explain the Christian perspective of the nature of spirituality and ethics in contrast to the perspective of postmodern relativism within health care.
  2. In 250-300 words, explain what scientism is and describe two of the main arguments against it.
  3. In 750-1,000 words, answer each of the worldview questions according to your own personal perspective and worldview: (a) What is ultimate reality? (b) What is the nature of the universe? (c) What is a human being? (d) What is knowledge? (e) What is your basis of ethics? (f) What is the purpose of your existence?

Remember to support your reflection with the topic study materials.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

Topic 1 DQ 1

 

What would spirituality be according to your own worldview? How do you believe that your conception of spirituality would influence the way in which you care for patients?

As being a Sikh woman, I have been raised in a religious family. I believe in God and prayers. I believe that God always listen to the prayers, and is always with me to protect me. As a Sikh woman, Guru Granth Sahib, the Sikh Holy book, is our God. Guru Granth sahib teaches us to love everyone and pray for everyone. Since spirituality teaches us to be patience, respectful, hard-worker, and that’s why spiritual people tend to live longer. “Some observational studies that people who have regular spiritual practices tend to live longer” (Puchalski, 2001). I believe that being spiritual teaches me to care for my patients with patience and compassion. I listen to spiritual songs called Shabad Kirtan, and pray for five minutes before going to work. At work, I treat all my patients with love and equal, since my religion teaches me to treat everyone with respect and equality.

Reference:

Bogue, D. (2018). An introduction to Christian values and decision making in Health Care. Practicing dignity: An introduction to Christian values and decision making in Health Care. Retrieved December 18, 2021, from https://lc.gcumedia.com/phi413v/practicing-dignity-an-introduction-to-christian-values-and-decision-making-in-health-care/v1.1/#/chapter/1

Puchalski, C. M. (2001, October). The role of spirituality in Health Care. Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center). Retrieved December 18, 2021, from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1305900/

Worldview Analysis And Personal Inventory

Worldview Analysis and Personal Inventory

1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%

2
Less than Satisfactory
65.00%

3
Satisfactory
75.00%

4
Good
85.00%

5
Excellent
100.00%

70.0 %Content

20.0 %Christian Perspective of Spirituality and Ethics in Contrast to Postmodern Relativism

Explanation of the Christian perspective of the nature of spirituality and ethics in contrast to the perspective of postmodern relativism is incomplete or insufficient.

Explanation of the Christian perspective of the nature of spirituality and ethics in contrast to the perspective of postmodern relativism is unclear. Explanation is not supported by topic study materials.

Explanation of the Christian perspective of the nature of spirituality and ethics in contrast to the perspective of postmodern relativism is clear. Explanation is not supported by topic study materials.

Explanation of the Christian perspective of the nature of spirituality and ethics in contrast to the perspective of postmodern relativism is clear and detailed. Explanation is supported by topic study materials.

Explanation of the Christian perspective of the nature of spirituality and ethics in contrast to the perspective of postmodern relativism is clear, detailed, and demonstrates a deep understanding of the subject. Explanation is supported by topic study materials.

20.0 %Scientism and Arguments

Explanation of scientism or the explanations of two main arguments against scientism are inaccurate. Details are not supported.

Description of scientism is accurate. Explanations of two main arguments against scientism are unclear. Details are not clearly supported by topic study materials.

Explanation of scientism is clear. Explanations of two main arguments against scientism are clear. Details are supported by topic study materials.

Explanation of scientism is clear and accurate. Explanations of two main arguments against scientism are clear. Details are clearly supported by topic study materials.

Explanation of scientism is clear and accurate. Explanations of two main arguments against scientism are clear and insightful. Details are clearly supported by topic study materials.

30.0 %Personal Perspective and Worldview

Worldview questions are not fully answered.

Each of the worldview questions is answered but is lacking a personal connection or clarity.

Each of the worldview questions is answered with personal connection.

Each of the worldview questions is answered clearly and with personal connection.

Each of the worldview questions is answered clearly and with deep personal insight.

30.0 %Organization, Effectiveness, and Format

7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.

Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.

Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

30.0 %Organization, Effectiveness, and Format

8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction

Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.

Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.

Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

30.0 %Organization, Effectiveness, and Format

5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

30.0 %Organization, Effectiveness, and Format

5.0 %Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.

Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

All format elements are correct.

30.0 %Organization, Effectiveness, and Format

5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

Sources are not documented.

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

100 %Total Weightage

Worldview Analysis and Personal Inventory – Rubric

Christian Perspective of Spirituality and Ethics in Contrast to Postmodern Relativism

Criteria Description

Christian Perspective of Spirituality and Ethics in Contrast to Postmodern Relativism

5. Excellent

30 points

Explanation of the Christian perspective of the nature of spirituality and ethics in contrast to the perspective of postmodern relativism is clear, detailed, and demonstrates a deep understanding of the subject. Explanation is supported by topic study materials.

4. Good

25.5 points

Explanation of the Christian perspective of the nature of spirituality and ethics in contrast to the perspective of postmodern relativism is clear and detailed. Explanation is supported by topic study materials.

3. Satisfactory

22.5 points

Explanation of the Christian perspective of the nature of spirituality and ethics in contrast to the perspective of postmodern relativism is clear. Explanation is not supported by topic study materials.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

19.5 points

Explanation of the Christian perspective of the nature of spirituality and ethics in contrast to the perspective of postmodern relativism is unclear. Explanation is not supported by topic study materials.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Explanation of the Christian perspective of the nature of spirituality and ethics in contrast to the perspective of postmodern relativism is incomplete or insufficient.

Scientism and Arguments

Criteria Description

Scientism and Arguments

5. Excellent

30 points

Explanation of scientism is clear and accurate. Explanations of two main arguments against scientism are clear and insightful. Details are clearly supported by topic study materials.

4. Good

25.5 points

Explanation of scientism is clear and accurate. Explanations of two main arguments against scientism are clear. Details are clearly supported by topic study materials.

3. Satisfactory

22.5 points

Explanation of scientism is clear. Explanations of two main arguments against scientism are clear. Details are supported by topic study materials.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

19.5 points

Description of scientism is accurate. Explanations of two main arguments against scientism are unclear. Details are not clearly supported by topic study materials.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Explanation of scientism or the explanations of two main arguments against scientism are inaccurate. Details are not supported.

Personal Perspective and Worldview

Criteria Description

Personal Perspective and Worldview

5. Excellent

30 points

Each of the worldview questions is answered clearly and with deep personal insight.

4. Good

25.5 points

Each of the worldview questions is answered clearly and with personal connection.

3. Satisfactory

22.5 points

Each of the worldview questions is answered with personal connection.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

19.5 points

Each of the worldview questions is answered but is lacking a personal connection or clarity.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Worldview questions are not fully answered.

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

Criteria Description

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

5. Excellent

5 points

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

4. Good

4.25 points

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

3. Satisfactory

3.75 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

3.25 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.

Documentation of Sources

Criteria Description

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

5. Excellent

5 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

4. Good

4.25 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

3. Satisfactory

3.75 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

2. Less Than Satisfactory

3.25 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Sources are not documented.

Rubric Criteria

Total 100 points

Criterion

1. Unsatisfactory

2. Less Than Satisfactory

3. Satisfactory

4. Good

5. Excellent

Scientism and Arguments

Scientism and Arguments

0 points

Explanation of scientism or the explanations of two main arguments against scientism are inaccurate. Details are not supported.

19.5 points

Description of scientism is accurate. Explanations of two main arguments against scientism are unclear. Details are not clearly supported by topic study materials.

22.5 points

Explanation of scientism is clear. Explanations of two main arguments against scientism are clear. Details are supported by topic study materials.

25.5 points

Explanation of scientism is clear and accurate. Explanations of two main arguments against scientism are clear. Details are clearly supported by topic study materials.

30 points

Explanation of scientism is clear and accurate. Explanations of two main arguments against scientism are clear and insightful. Details are clearly supported by topic study materials.

Documentation of Sources

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

0 points

Sources are not documented.

3.25 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

3.75 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

4.25 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

5 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

0 points

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.

3.25 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

3.75 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

4.25 points

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

5 points

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

Christian Perspective of Spirituality and Ethics in Contrast to Postmodern Relativism

Christian Perspective of Spirituality and Ethics in Contrast to Postmodern Relativism

0 points

Explanation of the Christian perspective of the nature of spirituality and ethics in contrast to the perspective of postmodern relativism is incomplete or insufficient.

19.5 points

Explanation of the Christian perspective of the nature of spirituality and ethics in contrast to the perspective of postmodern relativism is unclear. Explanation is not supported by topic study materials.

22.5 points

Explanation of the Christian perspective of the nature of spirituality and ethics in contrast to the perspective of postmodern relativism is clear. Explanation is not supported by topic study materials.

25.5 points

Explanation of the Christian perspective of the nature of spirituality and ethics in contrast to the perspective of postmodern relativism is clear and detailed. Explanation is supported by topic study materials.

30 points

Explanation of the Christian perspective of the nature of spirituality and ethics in contrast to the perspective of postmodern relativism is clear, detailed, and demonstrates a deep understanding of the subject. Explanation is supported by topic study materials.

Personal Perspective and Worldview

Personal Perspective and Worldview

0 points

Worldview questions are not fully answered.

19.5 points

Each of the worldview questions is answered but is lacking a personal connection or clarity.

22.5 points

Each of the worldview questions is answered with personal connection.

25.5 points

Each of the worldview questions is answered clearly and with personal connection.

30 points

Each of the worldview questions is answered clearly and with deep personal insight.