NURS 6003 Part 4 Research Analysis

NURS 6003 Part 4 Research Analysis

NURS 6003 Part 4 Research Analysis

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NURS 6003 Part 4 Research Analysis

Essentially, there are many approaches of identification and analysis of peer-reviewed articles. However, for this case, I would limit my database search to specifically peer-reviewed journals and taking time to examine if the research articles to see they are peer-reviewed. This can be done by searching the Walden University database by typing the exact title of the topic of interest. While analyzing peer-reviewed journals, I would check if crucial factors such as whether the article is written by experts and reviewed by many other experts in mental health field to guarantee quality (Al-Azawei, Serenelli & Lundqvist, 2016). Other vital signs are whether research is scientifically valid and attains logical conclusions. On the other hand, the strategies I will employ to find peer-reviewed articles include using combined search tab to help in searching numerous databases concurrently. Besides, I will also use Walden library database and restrict my search to peer-reviewed articles only.

Step 1: Research Analysis

Complete the table below

Topic of Interest:  
Research Article Mahlke, C. I., Priebe, S., Heumann, K., Daubmann, A., Wegscheider, K., & Bock, T. (2017). Effectiveness of one-to-one peer support for patients with severe mental illness–a randomised controlled trial. European Psychiatry, 42, 103-110.

 

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28364685

Professional Practice Use

 

This article can be effective for various professional use including

 

Ø  Helping in informing mental health education

Ø  Psychiatrics and mental health nurses can use the study to acquire knowledge of effectiveness of peer support in mental health cases.

Ø  Improving mental health management and treatment.

Ø  Professionals can use the recommendations to improve patient satisfaction and outcomes.

Research Analysis Matrix

Add more rows if necessary

Strengths of the Research Limitations/Weaknesses of the Research Relevancy to Topic of Interest Notes
Use of direct p patients with severe mental illness

 

 

 

Lack of blinded outcome assessments Involving patients with severe mental illnesses ensures that study portrays authentic outcomes  
Reasonable sample size

 

poor training and role definition of peer supporters Reasonable sample size ensures accurate mean values and ensure smaller error margin  
Extensive use of large data volume   Indicates that the study is resource oriented.  
Use of both intervention group and control group

 

Splitting the sample population led to reduced participants. Intervention and control groups ensures accuracy of the study outcomes  
 

 

     
 

 

     
 

 

     
 

 

     
 

 

     
 

 

     

 

Step 2: Summary of Analysis

Currently, mental health cases are consistently increasing in American and it has become a major health concern. Essentially,

NURS 6003 Part 4 Research Analysis
NURS 6003 Part 4 Research Analysis

mental disorders manifest in different forms and presentations. Mostly, they are characterized by a blend of irregular thoughts, emotions, perceptions, and poor association with others. They may include schizophrenia, depression, dementia, bipolar disorder, and other psychoses. However, despite the adverse effects of mental illnesses, there are effective techniques for preventing and treating mental disorders including better ways of avoiding sufferings caused by mental illnesses. Consequently, one of such strategies of managing mental disorders is one-to-one peer support as highlighted in the present article. Therefore, this article can be recommended to other mental health nurses to inform their practice because it provides in-depth details on how this peer support can be provided alongside treatment for better patient outcomes.

In using the CARP method, the information published is current and depict the present state of affairs. Regarding the authority, the authors are qualified and competent to rely on due to their vast experience in mental health they have gained in clinical practice and through working in different universities. Concerning relevance and reliability, the article is relevant to the topic because it touches on mental health disorders and particularly explores one-on-one peer support as a strategy of supporting patients with mental disorders. The final part of CARP method is purpose. Here, the purpose is to explore peer support in managing mental disorders. The authors clearly state this purpose and concluded that this approach to mental disorders is effective.

 

I intend to use Web of Science in future to find peer reviewed articles. This resource indexes key journals articles, data sets, proceedings from conference, and other important resources touching on different areas such as sciences, arts, social sciences, and humanities.

In conclusion, the area of interest here is psychiatric mental health. Essentially, mental health is consistently increasing in the contemporary society and it has become a major health concern. Therefore, effective prevention and treatment strategies are imperative to manage this menace. The present article is effective because it established that one-on-one peer support offered by qualified peer supporters is effective in enhancing self-efficacy of patients suffering from serious mental disorders within one year.

 

References

Al-Azawei, A., Serenelli, F., & Lundqvist, K. (2016). Universal Design for Learning (UDL): a content analysis of peer reviewed journals from 2012 to 2015. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 16(3), 39-56.

Mahlke, C. I., Priebe, S., Heumann, K., Daubmann, A., Wegscheider, K., & Bock, T. (2017). Effectiveness of one-to-one peer support for patients with severe mental illness–a randomised controlled trial. European Psychiatry, 42, 103-110.