NUR-550 Literature Review – Resubmission
NUR-550 Literature Review – Resubmission
NUR-550 Literature Review – Resubmission NUR 590 Topic 1 Assignment Submit your literature review from NUR-550 for your NUR-590 instructor to review. If your NUR-550 instructor indicated areas for revision be sure to incorporate these improvements prior to submitting your paper for this assignment.
You will use the revised literature review for your final written paper in Topic, 8 detailing your evidence-based practice project proposal.
Click here to ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER ASSIGNMENT on NUR-550 Literature Review – Resubmission
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
Struggling to Meet Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on NUR-550 Literature Review – Resubmission done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!
You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.
NUR-590 Course Objectives
In this course, the learner will:
- Explore research articles, nursing and related theories, applying levels of evidence, and theoretical frameworks to identify quality research studies.
- Demonstrate understanding of scientific inquiry, knowledge generation,utilization, and dissemination in advanced nursing practice.
- Evaluate the evidence for potential solutions/innovations that can potentially solve a health care issue and improve patient outcomes.
- Identify gaps in nursing knowledge and evidence-based practice that can potentially be resolved by planning and implementing a practice change project proposal.
- Evaluate health policy and advocacy issues for the purpose of improving health care outcomes.
- Propose quality improvement initiatives that advance the delivery of safe, high-quality health care.
- Design culturally appropriate clinical prevention interventions and population-based care that reduces risks, prevents disease, and promotes health and well-being
For additional information, the following is recommended:
Grammarly is an online writing assistance app that reviews written submissions and suggests context-specific corrections for grammar, spelling, word usage, wordiness, style, punctuation, and plagiarism. The reasoning for each suggested correction is provided, allowing users to make informed decisions about how to correct writing issues.
Grammarly can be installed as free browser extension, though Grammarly Premium requires an annual subscription. This subscription is not a GCU-required purchase.
NUR 590 Topic 2 DQ 1
Compare two organizational readiness tools. Identify the tool you selected and explain why it is most appropriate for assessing your organization.
The two organizational readiness tool that I had chosen are The Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) and the Organization Readiness Change Assessment (ORCA). The organization’s readiness assessment for change is a crucial factor in the implementation phase of any given public health intervention (“Selecting A Tool”, n.d.). These tools can assist in evidenced-based practice (EBP) interventions. The Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care Questionnaire also known as PACIC is a tool that is used to make an evaluation of the perspective of the patient with regards to the receipt of patient care delivery in the 5 domains namely: activation, delivery system, goal setting, problem solving, and follow-up (Gensichen et al., 2011). PACIC tool can be used for conditions that incurable and illnesses that lasts for a prolonged period time. On the other hand, the ORCA tool has 4 main purposes: learning about the degree of motivation, assessment of organizational abilities, improvement of organizational capacities, and empowerment of organizations (Dearing, 2018).
The most appropriate tool for assessing my organization is the ORCA tool because it can help with identifying and monitoring of organizational strengths and weakness or an organization (“Organizational Readiness”, 2017).By using this tool in clinical settings which it was originally intended for, can help with providing support and success of EBP.
NUR-550 Literature Review – Resubmission References
Dearing, J. (2018). Organizational readiness tools for global health intervention: A review. Frontiers In Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00056
Gensichen J, Serras A, Paulitsch MA, Rosemann T, König J, Gerlach FM, Petersen JJ. (2011).The Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care questionnaire: Evaluation in patients with mental disorders in primary care. Community Ment Health J, 47(4):447-53. doi: 10.1007/s10597-010-9340-2.
“Organizational Readiness”. (2017). National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools. http://www.nccmt.ca/resources/search/187.
“Selecting A Tool”.(n.d.). National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools. https://www.nccmt.ca/knowledge-repositories/search/279
Organizational readiness assessments allow for change leaders and champions to assess key areas of organization structure, stability and culture in order to make an informed decision as to whether or not a change or improvement initiative is going to be successful, and the right intervention at the right time (HRSA, 2021). Upon comparison of two different examples of organizational readiness assessments designed for healthcare, there are certainly similarities but also differences that must be considered when selecting one that is right for a particular organization and initiative.
The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) has an evidence-based safety and teamwork communication program by the name of TeamSTEPPS. This evidence-based program has been around for 20 years, and is now an evidence-based intervention effective at improving perceptions of teamwork, communication and trust, as well as sound data supporting improved patient safety metrics in an organization (AHRQ, 2021). With this, a readiness assessment is highlighted as a key part of the process to ensure an organization is ready for TeamSTEPPS implementation. Utilizing the AHRQ TeamSTEPPS Readiness Assessment, areas of defined need, readiness for change in culture, time/resources/personnel, and sustainment of the change are assessed in a checklist format that is easy-to-use for any individual assessing whether or not this intervention is right for one’s organization (AHRQ, 2021).
Comparatively, the Maryland Healthcare Commission (2019) provides a tool for healthcare organizations interested in implementing a standardized telehealth program with aim to improve the safety, quality, fiscal stewardship and patient experience side of healthcare. The readiness assessment provided- includes core readiness, financial considerations, operations, staff engagement and patient readiness. Maryland Healthcare Commission highlights a toolkit they’ve created to guide the assessment of successful improvement of one’s healthcare system telehealth practices.
Advanced Nursing Research: From Theory to Practice
Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing and Healthcare : A Guide to Best Practice
RefWorks and EndNote: RefWorks and EndNote Login
Manage your citations with the RefWorks tool, located on the GCU Library website. RefWorks automates the creation of your reference lists in the format of your choice (APA, MLA, etc.).
Library Walk Through Tutorial
View the “Library Walk Through Tutorial.”
Discussion Forum Guidelines and Example
Review the “Discussion Forum Guidelines and Example” document for your weekly discussion forum participation.
For additional information, the following is recommended:
ThinkingStorm is an online tutoring resource that provides flexible support to supplement traditional educational environments. The tutoring center is remotely accessible to GCU learners with a computer and an Internet connection and offers convenient hours for learners with busy schedules. ThinkingStorm tutoring includes a writing center that offers 24/7 submission-based writing support, as well as live writing support across the curriculum.
If you are interested in utilizing ThinkingStorm’s writing support, submit your documents chapter by chapter, rather than as a full manuscript.
To assist learners with thei
APA Writing Style
APA Style is required for all writing assignments in this course, where indicated. Please prepare these assignments according to the APA Style Guide, located in the in the Student Success Center.
You may want to consider purchasing a copy of the APA style guide as this will be a useful resource throughout your program. NUR-550 Literature Review – Resubmission NUR 590 Topic 1 Assignment
University Policy Handbook
The Writing Process
Reading a Scientific Article
GCU Library: Persistent Links
Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal –Assignment Overview
Learners are required to develop an evidence-based practice project proposal. The project begins in NUR-550 and culminates in NUR-590. The project will be completed in sections throughout both courses and culminate in NUR-590, during which the project elements are synthesized into a final written paper that details the evidence-based practice project proposal.
Refer to the “Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal – Assignment Overview” document for an overview of the evidence-based practice project proposal assignments. This document serves only to provide context for the overall project and how the assignments interact. Refer to each assignment in the classroom for the assignment criteria and rubric information.
Refer to the resources located in the Writing Center for PowerPoint guidelines, APA style, writing and library tutorials, and research and writing assistance.
Advanced Practice Nursing: Essential Knowledge for the Profession
GCU Library Research Guides: Citing Sources
Evaluating Sources: What Is a “Scholarly” Source?
APA Writing Checklist
Use the “APA Writing Checklist” to act as a checklist for each paper you will write throughout your GCU graduate program.
MSN-APA Writing Checklist-Student.docx
GCU Library: General Research Guide
Review the “General Research” guide, located on the GCU Library website.
Centre for Evidence Based Medicine: About Us
Read “About Us” page of the Centre for Evidence Based Medicine (CEBM) website.
Evidence Based Medicine
Explore the Evidence Based Medicine page of the University of Illinois Library of the Health Sciences website. Use this website as a resource for y
Striving for Evidence-Based Practice Innovations Through a Hybrid Model Journal Club: A Pilot Study
Read “Striving for Evidence-Based Practice Innovations Through a Hybrid Model Journal Club: A Pilot Study,” by Wilson, Ice, Nakashima, Cox,
Evidence-Based Practice Tutorial
Read the Evidence-Based Practice tutorial, located on the Duke University website.
Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing and Healthcare : A Guide to Best Practice
Read Chapters 1-3 in Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing and Healthcare: A Guide to Best Practice.
A Leader’s Guide to Implementing Evidence-Based Practice: Lead the Way to Healthcare Quality and Safety
Read “A Leader’s Guide to Implementing Evidence-Based Practice: Lead the Way to Healthcare Quality and Safety,” by Tucker and Melnyk, from
Evidence Based Medicine Toolkit
Explore the “Evidence Based Medicine Toolkit,” by Buckingham, Fisher, and Saunders (2012), located on the University of Alberta website.
Centre for Evidence Based Medicine: Resources
Explore the Resources page of the Centre for Evidence Based Medicine (CEBM) website.
Evaluation of a Nurse Practitioner-Led Project to Improve Communication and Collaboration in the Acute Care Setting
Read “Evaluation of a Nurse Practitioner-Led Project to Improve Communication and Collaboration in the Acute Care Setting,” by Austin, Powe
Implementation Science and Nursing Leadership: Improving the Adoption and Sustainability of Evidence-Based Practice
Read “Implementation Science and Nursing Leadership: Improving the Adoption and Sustainability of Evidence-Based Practice,” by Nelson-Brant
Advanced Nursing Research: From Theory to Practice
Read Chapters 1 and 2 in Advanced Nursing Research: From Theory to Practice.
TOPIC 1 DQ 1
Based on the PICOT you developed for NUR-550, summarize the intervention you are proposing. How does this support the population of focus, your setting, and role? Justify how the problem you selected to investigate is amenable to a research-based intervention using the PICOT format. Include your PICOT statement with your response.
Alzheimer’s patients were disproportionately affected by COVID-19 (Azarpazhooh, 2020; Wang, 2021). While there is a biologic/genetic component to the mortality rates (Wang et al., 2020), it is unknown whether the quarantine induced social isolation contributed to mortality rates. Since COVID-19 vaccines have high efficacy (CDC, 2021) and have increased the safety of the elderly in community settings, it has become more common for facilities to allow Alzheimer’s family member act as a caregiver and advocate.
The importance of family/friends to Alzheimer’s patients can not be denied. During the initial COVID-19 lock-downs of community settings and long-term care, dementia patients neuropsychiatric symptoms and confusion increased due to the dramatic change and loss of their loved ones (Boutoleau-Bretonnière,2020). Therefore, during the pandemic, caregivers were eventually allowed into the facilities for compassionate visitation. The question facing the community as it faces future pandemics and lock-downs, is how to keep the Alzheimer’s patients safe without the dramatic social isolation from their family caregivers. Therefore, like paid caregivers and medical staff, family caregivers should receive basic infection control training. The PICOT is defined by: NUR-550 Literature Review – Resubmission NUR 590 Topic 1 Assignment
Will educating Alzheimer’s’ caregivers in disease transmission control help reduce community acquired infections in Alzheimer’s patients living in community settings (i.e., long term care or assisted living) over a 3-month period?
Population: Alzheimer’s patients
Intervention: disease transmission education
Comparison: education complete versus not
Outcome: reduce community acquired infections (i.e. COVID-19, pneumonia, etc.)
Time period: 3 months
By educating family caregivers, it adds to the resources of the community settings. In the case of long-term care, the patient receives better care from their family member with staff support and reduces demands on staff time. This reduces staff stress and caseload while increasing the availability of staff to other patients.
Azarpazhooh, M. R., Amiri, A., Morovatdar, N., Steinwender, S., Rezaei Ardani, A., Yassi, N., Biller, J., Stranges, S., Tokazebani Belasi, M., Neya, S. K., Khorram, B., Sheikh Andalibi, M. S., Arsang-Jang, S., Mokhber, N., & Di Napoli, M. (2020). Correlations between COVID-19 and burden of dementia: An ecological study and review of literature. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 416, 117013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2020.117013
Boutoleau-Bretonnière, C., Pouclet-Courtemanche, H., Gillet, A., Bernard, A., Deruet, A., Gouraud, I., Mazoue, A., Lamy, E., Rocher, L., Kapogiannis, D., El Haj, M. (2020). The effects of confinement on neuropsychiatric symptoms in Alzheimer’s disease during the COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease. 76(1):41-47. doi: 10.3233/JAD-200604. PMID: 32568211.
Wang Q., Davis P., Gurney M., Xu, R. (2021) COVID‐19 and dementia: Analyses of risk, disparity, and outcomes from electronic health records in the US. Alzheimer’s Dementia, 2021, 1– 10. https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.12296
TOPIC 1 DQ 2
Explain the importance of a “spirit of inquiry” in an evidence-based culture and what you can do as an advanced registered nurse to encourage this within your practice or organization. In response to your peers, compare the role and implementation of EBP in your specialty area with another advanced registered nurse specialty.
Evidence-based practice for nursing is driven by the influence and motivation to seek more information that would support interventions and practice. The spirit of inquiry is the term given to this motivation as nurses continue to question current practices and knowledge for evidence-based practice. Without it, research would go stale and would not produce any change that could significantly increase positive outcomes in health care or practice. Evidence-based culture is dependent on those who nurses who seek to explore more possibility in practice, patient care and health knowledge so that health care not only constantly improving but also evolving to meet changes in health demands and technologies. Advanced registered nurses can encourage inquiry in their respective areas of practice where they feel that although there is good outcomes, better ones can be produced with a change in evidence-based practice. This would require extensive research which those advanced nurses must have the motivation to thoroughly examine through the evidence-based research process. Giving opportunity to make changes to how they practice and how it affects the patients will produce professional rewarding as well as personal ones too which is why nudging and leading other nurses to participate in change can greatly improve patient outcomes from interventions (Arzouman, 2015).
Nurse Informaticists utilize evidence-based communication and technology integration techniques so that patient care and information systems are beneficial to all parties involved. Utilization of nursing experience in order to enhance communication or health records can streamline patient care so that efficiency can reach maximum potential. Leadership is also important to nursing informatics and communication when implementing evidence-based practice interventions. Having knowledge of communication barriers and having implementing creativity in overcoming them provides valuable resources to patient care and health (Farokhzadian, Jouparineiad, Fatehi & Falahati-Marvast, 2021).
NUR-550 Literature Review – Resubmission References:
Arzouman, J. (2015). Evidence-Based Practice: Share the Spirit of Inquiry. MEDSURG Nursing, 24(4), 209–211.
Farokhzadian, J., Jouparinejad, S., Fatehi, F., & Falahati-Marvast, F. (2021). Improving nurses’ readiness for evidence-based practice in critical care units: results of an information literacy training program. BMC Nursing, 20(1). https://doi-org.lopes.idm.oclc.org/10.1186/s12912-021-00599-y
RESPOND HERE (150 WORS, 3 REFERENCES)
This is insightful Deanna, Maternal Morbidity and Mortality are on the rise in the United States compared to any other developed country. Maternal morbidity refers to the physical or mental illnesses or disability that directly relates to childbirth or pregnancy (Blosser et al., 2021). The above conditions may not be necessarily life-threatening but can lead to significant effects on the quality of life. Due to different health conditions, women often experience Postpartum hemorrhage which leads to high number of deaths (Evensen et al., 2017). Postpartum hemorrhage refers to a situation where women experience heavy bleeding after birth. The condition is always serious but rare; it is normally experiences within a day after childbirth. However, it can occur up to 12 weeks after birth. Almost one in five in 100 women suffer from postpartum hemorrhage in the United States (Newsome et al., 2017). The proposed intervention can successfully leads to the reduction in the number of deaths caused by postpartum hemorrhage in different healthcare settings.
NUR-550 Literature Review – Resubmission References
Blosser, C., Smith, A., & Poole, A. T. (2021). Quantification of blood loss improves detection of postpartum hemorrhage and accuracy of postpartum hemorrhage rates: A retrospective cohort study. Cureus. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.13591
Evensen, A., Anderson, J. M., & Fontaine, P. (2017). Postpartum hemorrhage: prevention and treatment. American family physician, 95(7), 442-449. https://www.aafp.org/afp/20
Patient safety and improved quality of care requires providers and organization to use evidence-based practice (EBP) interventions to tackle issues that may cause adverse events like patient falls. Patients in medical-surgical units are susceptible to falls because of their delicate nature. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) considers falls as never events since they are preventable (Melnyk et al., 2022). Falls lead to increased stay in hospitals, poor patient outcome and serious fractures and head injuries that can lead to death. The use of bundled care approach through TIPS (tailoring interventions for patient safety) is considered one of the most effective ways to reduce and prevent falls in medical-surgical settings. The purpose of this literature review paper of the EBP project is to compare articles on the use of TIPS toolkit to reduce and prevent falls in medical-surgical settings.
PICOT Statement and Question
Nationwide, patient falls while in hospitals, particularly in medical-surgical units, are a leading cause of permanent disability and even death. Further, hospitalization increases one’s fall risk as close to three percent of patients fall while in hospitals. Nearly 30% of those who experience falls sustain injuries with a rise in the number of days in hospitals by close to 7 days. Again, under Medicare, the CMS does not reimburse falls and hospitals cannot get a Magnet designation when their fall rates are not below the national average (Khasnabish et al., 2020). The implication is that hospital managers and leaders must seek ways, through the use of evidence-based practice, to reduce the occurrence of falls. The use of TIPS toolkit is considered one of the most effective ways to reduce and mitigate falls and their occurrences as well as effects on patients in medical-surgical units.
Among hospitalized adult patients in medical-surgical units (P) does the use of TIPS toolkit as a bundled care approach (I) compared to normal falls prevention approach (C) reduce the prevalence of falls (O) within 6 months (T)?
The evidence-based practice process implores researchers to seek evidence from previous research articles when doing their literature to obtain findings that support their proposed projects or interventions. The use terms, phrases and words associated with the topic under investigation and exploring databases to generate scholarly sources are some of the standard search strategies that one can deploy to attain relevant evidence. The study employed these strategies, starting with key terms and words in different databases. These included PubMed, Cochrane and Google Scholar as well as CINAHL. The strategy also entailed the use of CRAAP approach that involves searching for articles which are current, relevant, accurate, authoritative and purposeful to the area or topic under investigations (Melnyk et al., 2022). Using this criteria, the paper identified the reviewed articles and describes how they support the proposed EBP project to reduce and prevent the occurrence of falls in medical-surgical settings.
The first article by Dykes et al. (2020) evaluates the use of a patient-centered fall prevention TIPS to lower falls and their associated injuries. Using non-randomized controlled trials with the study set in 14 medical units in Boston and New York, the researchers show a positive link between the intervention and a decline in number of falls. The researchers are categorical that nurse-led interventions can reduce injurious falls through providing information to families on fall management and prevention. The article demonstrates the efficacy of using TIPS as an intervention as depicted by the PICOT question.
The second article by Tzeng et al. (2021) focuses on the impact of using TIPS program in reducing falls among older adults in nursing homes. Using a mixed method approach in a 15-bed nursing unit, the findings from the study shows that fall TIPS can reduce the rate of falls, especially injurious falls among older patients or adults. The TIPS program entails different approaches that include patient education and creating awareness about the harmful effects of falls. The article is critical to the EBP proposed project as it illustrates the increased role of TIPS initiative to reduce falls as depicted in the PICOT question. The article supports the EBP project since it shows that TIPS as an intervention is effective.
In this article by Morris et al. (2022) the researchers conduct a systematic review of literature and meta-analysis on diverse interventions that can reduce falls. The researchers identify a host of interventions based on the data collected from the 43 studies that met their inclusion criteria. The findings show that tailoring or customization of interventions leads to reduced rates of falls for patients in such facilities. These interventions are effective when they consider the different components and factors impacting patient situations. As such, the article supports the EBP proposed project by demonstrating the effectiveness of diverse and tailored interventions for patients based on their level of acuity.
The fourth article by Heng et al. (2020) is a scoping review of how hospitals can use patient education as a strategy to prevent falls. The researchers focused on 43 articles when analyzing the different approaches in patient education that confer benefits to patients to reduce their susceptibility to falls. The analysis shows that patient educational interventions can reduce falls that lead to injuries and bruises as well as lacerations and fractures. The study recommends the need to deploy TIPS as an effective approach to reducing and mitigating falls among patients. The article supports the EBP proposed project as it shows the need for diverse interventions like different approaches to educating patients on fall risks that they may be exposed to in their activities of daily living.
In their article, LeLaurin et al. (201) aim at familiarizing different stakeholders about the benefits as well as the cons of various types of research studies on testing fall prevention interventions. The researchers opine that organizations and providers should focus on diverse interventions, one point at a time, to attain their efficacy and impact on patient fall management. The study’s findings are categorical that the effectiveness of each type of interventions depends on a host of factors. Therefore, customizing or tailoring these interventions is essential to attaining quality outcomes and helping patients avoid and reduce their susceptibility to falls. The article is important in the EBP project as it shows the need for tailoring each intervention to suit patient needs and situations.
The article by Dykes et al. (2019) focuses on the effectiveness of tailoring interventions through a collaborative approach among providers. Using a qualitative approach or design, the article demonstrates that fall TIPS program is effective in reducing and preventing falls in diverse patient settings. The study is emphatic that TIPS model is important for providers to reduce and prevent falls. The article supports the EBP proposed project as it illustrates the importance of customizing interventions to meet patient needs and reduce susceptibility to falls.
In this article by Cuttloer et al. (2018), the researchers aim at reducing inpatient falls in medical-surgical settings through technology-enabled TIPS initiative. The researchers use a four-minute video to provide patient education and collect their views on the implementation based on their situation. The findings are consistent that TIPS initiatives reduce and prevent falls. Therefore, the article supports the EBP project by showing that tailoring interventions is essential in addressing patient falls in medical-surgical settings.
In their study, Bargmann et al. (2020) evaluates the effects of implementing a multicomponent fall prevention program to improve patient safety because of risks associated with falls. Set in a 26-bed medical surgical telemetry unit, the study shows that these interventions are effective in reducing falls and risks associated with falling for fragile patients. The article supports the EBP project since it is categorical that TIPS model reduce and prevents the occurrence of falls.
Comparison of the Articles
The reviewed articles share certain aspects in their research findings and also differ in other areas. for instance, all the articles agree that tailoring interventions on falls is an effective strategy that all providers and facilities should leverage in their settings. Again, the article agree that the TIPS model gives hospitals and providers increased leeway to implement interventions that are appropriate to their facilities based on their cost and other components. Thirdly, all the articles demonstrate that multiple interventions are complementary to the efforts and policies developed by organizations to reduce and prevent falls in their articles.
None of the article demonstrates controversies but all agree conclusively that more studies are required to provide significant outcomes. The articles also share limitations like timelines to conduct the studies, use of same settings and need for beet support from management and other stakeholders (Khasnabish et al., 2020). The articles do not have significant differences as they are emphatic that these diverse interventions are necessary in reducing falls, especially injurious falls among older patients.
Suggestions for Future Research
An analytical perspective of the eight articles and others demonstrate the need for more research to tackle some of the gaps. For instance, the articles do not offer a standard TIPS approach that can be used across all facilities, irrespective of their patient’s acuity and needs. As such, it is important to have more studies on the development of a standardized tool or approach to falls based on the nature of the respective setting, from medical-surgical units to outpatient facilities.
Falls are a major health issue that impact overall quality of care and life for patients, especially the elderly admitted to medical-surgical units. The use of TIPS toolkit; either patient-centered or nurse-driven, is critical to reducing these falls because of their adverse effects like injuries and long-term fractures and disabilities. The articles are emphatic that using TIPS allows providers to offer the most effective interventions to reduce and prevent their occurrence. The review illustrates that sufficient evidence exists to support the proposed interventions based on the TIPS framework to reduce falls.
NUR-550 Literature Review – Resubmission References
Bargmann, A. L., & Brundrett, S. M. (2020). Implementation of a multicomponent fall
prevention program: Contracting with patients for fall safety. Military medicine, 185(Supplement_2), 28-34. https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usz411
Cuttler, S. J., Barr-Walker, J., & Cuttler, L. (2018). Reducing medical-surgical inpatient falls and
injuries with videos, icons and alarms. BMJ open quality, 6(2), e000119.
Dykes, P. C., Adelman, J. S., Alfieri, L., Bogaisky, M., Carroll, D., Carter, E., … & Spivack, L.
- (2019). The fall TIPS (tailoring interventions for patient safety) program: A collaboration to end the persistent problem of patient Falls. Nurse Leader, 17(4), 365-370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mnl.2018.11.006
Dykes, P. C., Burns, Z., Adelman, J., Benneyan, J., Bogaisky, M., Carter, E., Ergai, A., Lindros,
- E., Lipsitz, S. R., Scanlan, M., Shaykevich, S., & Bates, D. (2020). Evaluation of a Patient-Centered Fall-Prevention Tool Kit to Reduce Falls and Injuries. JAMA Network Open, 3(11), e2025889. https://doi.org/10
Heng, H., Jazayeri, D., Shaw, L., Kiegaldie, D., Hill, A. M., & Morris, M. E. (2020). Hospital
falls prevention with patient education: a scoping review. BMC geriatrics, 20, 1-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-020-01515-w
Khasnabish, S., Burns, Z., Couch, M., Mullin, M., Newmark, R., & Dykes, P. C. (2020). Best
practices for data visualization: creating and evaluating a report for an evidence-based fall prevention program. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 27(2), 308-314. DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocz190.
LeLaurin, J. H., & Shorr, R. I. (2019). Preventing falls in hospitalized patients: state of the
science. Clinics in geriatric medicine, 35(2), 273-283. DOI: 10.1016/j.cger.2019.01.007
Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2022). Evidence-based practice in nursing &
healthcare: A guide to best practice. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Morris, M. E., Webster, K., Jones, C., Hill, A. M., Haines, T., McPhail, S., … & Cameron, I.
(2022). Interventions to reduce falls in hospitals: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Age and Ageing, 51(5), afac077. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afac077
Tzeng, H.-M., Jansen, L. S., Okpalauwaekwe, U., Khasnabish, S., Andreas, B., & Dykes, P. C.
(2021). Adopting the Fall Tailoring Interventions for Patient Safety (TIPS) Program to Engage Older Adults in Fall Prevention in a Nursing Home. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, https://doi.org/10.1097/ncq.0000000000000547
Don’t wait until the last minute
Fill in your requirements and let our experts deliver your work asap.