NUR 550 Benchmark – Part B: Literature Review Assignment

Sample Answer for NUR 550 Benchmark – Part B: Literature Review Assignment Included After Question

In Part A, you described the population and quality initiative related to your PICOT (Population/Problem, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, and Time to achieve the outcome) statement. In this assignment, you will formalize your PICOT and research process.

Use the GCU Library to perform a search for peer-reviewed research articles. Find five peer-reviewed primary source translational research articles.

In a paper of 1,250-1,500 words, synthesize the research into a literature review. The literature review should provide an overview for the reader that illustrates the research related to your particular PICOT. Include the following:

Introduction: Describe the clinical issue or problem you are addressing.

Methods: Describe the criteria you used in choosing your articles

Synthesize the Literature: Part A: Discuss the main components of each article (subjects, methods, key findings) and provide rationale for how this supports your PICOT; Part B: Compare and contrast the articles: Discuss limitations, controversies, and similarities/differences of the studies.

Areas of Further Study: Analyze the evidence presented in your articles to identify what is known, unknown, and requires further study.

You are required to cite five to 10 sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

A Sample Answer For the Assignment: NUR 550 Benchmark – Part B: Literature Review Assignment

Title: NUR 550 Benchmark – Part B: Literature Review Assignment

Description of the Clinical Issue

Major depressive disorder is recognized as a highly prevalent disorder with serious health problems to the patients, their families and the community as a whole. According to statistics, the lifetime prevalence of the disease in the US is 16% while it affects above 30 million Europeans (Gartlehner et al., 2017). The statistics imply that more than 16 million people in America aged above 18 years are affected by the disease on an annual basis (Dunlop et al., 2019). The disorder is mainly characterized by symptoms that include low self-confidence, low vigor, aversion of activities without any reason, and low mood. Functional impairment occurs due to the influence of a wide range of symptoms that include suicidality, impaired concentration, sleep disturbance, and anhedonia (Dunlop et al., 2019). The risk of its recurrence is significantly high, which increases the disease burden as well as the need for interventions that aim at promoting the mental and physical health of the patients. Sadly, the severity of the symptoms and the effects it has on one’s health increases with every subsequent recurrence. For instance, relapses result in significant mental, social, physical, and financial costs to the family, patient, and the society as a whole (Zhang et al., 2018).

Statistics have shown that the prevalence rate of major depressive disorder among African-American population is lower than that of Caucasians in the state.  However, the risks of complications among them are significantly high despite the prevalence among them being low. The difference is largely attributed to factors such as their poor utilization of the available healthcare services, low access to the existing mental health services, and access to mental health services that are of low quality. There is also the fact that issues such as norms and cultural values influence the utilization of mental health services among African-Americans. It is expected that a society’s negative perception towards mental health issues due to the influence of cultural beliefs and practice will reduce the utilization of the available mental health services (Sohail et al., 2014).

The use of antidepressants is largely known as the gold approach to managing major depressive disorder. Research has consistently shown that medications such as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors are effective in treating the symptoms and relapse associated with the disorder (Zhang et al., 2018). There is also the increasing use of non-pharmacological interventions in the management of major depressive disorder. The preference of non-pharmacological methods arises from the health effects that are attributed to antidepressants therapies. Statistics have shown that up to 63% of the patients on antidepressant therapy experience adverse outcomes of the medications, which lead to 7-15% of them discontinuing the treatment (Gartlehner et al., 2017). There is limited evidence on whether a combined use of pharmacotherapy and non-pharmacotherapy will reduce the health impacts of major depressive disorder or not. Therefore, this proposed research will explore it, with the guidance of the following PICOT question:

In African-American patients with major depressive disorder, will the use of combined intervention involving cognitive behavioral therapy and antidepressants reduce severity of complications when compared to the use of antidepressants alone within 12 months?

NUR 550 Benchmark – Part B: Literature Review Assignment

NUR 550 Benchmark – Part B: Literature Review Assignment: In Part A, you described the population and quality initiative related to your PICOT (Population/Problem, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, and Time to achieve the outcome) statement. In this assignment, you will formalize your PICOT and research process.

Use the GCU Library to perform a search for peer-reviewed research articles. Find five peer-reviewed primary source translational research articles.

NUR 550 Benchmark – Part B: Literature Review Assignment ORDER NOW FOR INSTRUCTIONS-COMPLIANT, ORIGINAL PAPER on 

In a paper of 1,250-1,500 words, synthesize the research into a literature review. The literature review should provide an overview for the reader that illustrates the research related to your particular PICOT. Include the following:

Introduction: Describe the clinical issue or problem you are addressing.

Methods: Describe the criteria you used in choosing your articles

Synthesize the Literature: Part A: Discuss the main components of each article (subjects, methods, key findings) and provide rationale for how this supports your PICOT; Part B: Compare and contrast the articles: Discuss limitations, controversies, and similarities/differences of the studies.

Areas of Further Study: Analyze the evidence presented in your articles to identify what is known, unknown, and requires further study.

You are required to cite five to 10 sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center. NUR 550 Benchmark – Part B: Literature Review Assignment

Course Code
Class Code

NUR-550
NUR-550-O101

Benchmark – Part B: Literature Review
250.0

Criteria
Percentage
Unsatisfactory (0.00%)
Less than Satisfactory (80.00%)
Satisfactory (88.00%)
Good (92.00%)
Excellent (100.00%)
Comments
Points Earned

Content
70.0%

Introduction

5.0%
An introduction is not included.
An introduction is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.
An introduction is present.
An introduction is clearly provided and well developed.
A comprehensive introduction is thoroughly developed with supporting details.

Methods

15.0%
A discussion of methods, including criteria used to select the articles, is not included.
A discussion of methods, including criteria used to select the articles, is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.
A discussion of methods, including criteria used to select the articles, is present.
A discussion of methods, including criteria used to select the articles, is clearly provided and well developed.
A comprehensive discussion of methods, including criteria used to select the articles, is thoroughly developed with supporting details.

Literature Synthesis, Part A

15.0%
A discussion of the main components of each article, including subjects, methods, key findings, and rationale for how the article supports the PICOT statement, is not included.
A discussion of the main components of each article, including subjects, methods, key findings, and rationale for how the article supports the PICOT statement, is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.
A discussion of the main components of each article, including subjects, methods, key findings, and rationale for how the article supports the PICOT statement, is present.
A discussion of the main components of each article, including subjects, methods, key findings, and rationale for how the article supports the PICOT statement, is clearly provided and well developed.
A comprehensive discussion of the main components of each article, including subjects, methods, key findings, and rationale for how the article supports the PICOT statement, is thoroughly developed with supporting details. NUR 550 Benchmark – Part B: Literature Review Assignment

Literature Synthesis, Part B

15.0%
A discussion of the limitations, controversies, similarities, and differences of the studies is not included.
A discussion of the limitations, controversies, similarities, and differences of the studies is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.
A discussion of the limitations, controversies, similarities, and differences of the studies is present.
A discussion of the limitations, controversies, similarities, and differences of the studies is clearly provided and well developed.
A comprehensive discussion of the limitations, controversies, similarities, and differences of the studies is thoroughly developed with supporting details.

Areas of Further Study

15.0%
An analysis of evidence in the articles to identify what is known, unknown, and needed for further study is not included.
An analysis of evidence in the articles to identify what is known, unknown, and needed for further study is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.
An analysis of evidence in the articles to identify what is known, unknown, and needed for further study is present.
An analysis of evidence in the articles to identify what is known, unknown, and needed for further study is clearly provided and well developed.
A comprehensive analysis of evidence in the articles to identify what is known, unknown, and needed for further study is thoroughly developed with supporting details. NUR 550 Benchmark – Part B: Literature Review Assignment

Required Sources

5.0%
Sources are not included.
Number of required sources is only partially met.
Number of required sources is met, but sources are outdated or inappropriate.
Number of required sources is met. Sources are current, but not all sources are appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.
Number of required resources is met. Sources are current, and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

Organization and Effectiveness
20.0%

Thesis Development and Purpose
7.0%
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

Argument Logic and Construction

8.0%
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.
Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.
Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. NUR 550 Benchmark – Part B: Literature Review Assignment

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

5.0%
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

Format
10.0%

Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
5.0%
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.
Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.
Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
All format elements are correct.
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)
5.0%
Sources are not documented.
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

A Sample Answer 2 For the Assignment: NUR 550 Benchmark – Part B: Literature Review Assignment

Title: NUR 550 Benchmark – Part B: Literature Review Assignment

I agree with you on the fact that it is imperative to put measures in place to help support the campaign against cervical cancer and help in raising awareness on healthy lifestyle choices that will keep cancer and other related comorbidities at bay (Fontham et al., 2020). One organization that is committed to raising such awareness and helping in development of the framework on reducing the damage of cancer in our societies is the American Cancer Society. The society works in collaboration with community-based organizations to encourage people on cessation of cigarette smoking, reduction in alcohol consumption, healthy nutrition and physical exercise to keep fit. Moreover, they do partner enhancing access to quality healthcare services. This helps in ensuring that the people are able to undergo early screening and incase of any risk they begin early treatment before the cancer spreads to vital organs. There are also programs that encourages sharing of the experiences, with an interactive online community of cancer survivors who give hope to those battling the disease (American Cancer Society, 2018). It also advocates for equality in terms of healthcare services and reducing the healthcare disparities that arise among different racial and ethnic communities in the US.

References

Fontham, E. T. H., Wolf, A. M. D., Church, T. R., Etzioni, R., Flowers, C. R., Herzig, A., Guerra, C. E., Oeffinger, K. C., Shih, Y. T., Walter, L. C., Kim, J. J., Andrews, K. S., DeSantis, C. E., Fedewa, S. A., Manassaram‐Baptiste, D., Saslow, D., Wender, R. C., & Smith, R. A. (2020). Cervical cancer screening for individuals at average risk: 2020 guideline update from the American Cancer Society. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 70(5). https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21628

American Cancer Society. (2018). How We’re Providing Support. Cancer.org; American Cancer Society. https://www.cancer.org/about-us/what-we-do/providing-support.html