fbpx NR 509 Week 5 Assignment: Debriefing Session or Alternate Writing Assignment

NR 509 Week 5 Assignment: Debriefing Session or Alternate Writing Assignment

Sample Answer for NR 509 Week 5 Assignment: Debriefing Session or Alternate Writing Assignment Included After Question

NR 509 Week 5 Assignment: Debriefing Session or Alternate Writing Assignment

NR 509 Week 5 Assignment: Debriefing Session or Alternate Writing Assignment

You will need to complete either a debriefing session or the alternate writing assignment!

NR 509 Week 5 Assignment Debriefing

Faculty will lead virtual debriefing sessions during Weeks 1-6. The date, time, and duration of the weekly debriefing session will be posted by the course faculty. Students must register to attend the debriefing session.

During the debriefing process, students reflect upon their simulation experience and revisit their assessments, interventions, observations, and patient responses. Faculty coach students to review patient data and reflect upon the interventions performed in response to the clinical situation presented during the simulation experience. This process facilitates students to analyze their own thought processes and supports transference of knowledge gained from simulation experiences to actual clinical practice.

Online Nursing Essays

Struggling to Meet Your Deadline?

Get your assignment on NR 509 Week 5 Assignment: Debriefing Session or Alternate Writing Assignment done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!

The goals of each debriefing session are to:

  • Answer questions
  • Address perspectives, perceptions, and concerns
  • Emphasize and reinforce learning objectives and clinical outcomes
  • Create linkages to the “real world”
  • Assess and validate what was learned

Each student is expected to contribute to the debriefing session by:

  • Reflecting on personal strengths, limitations, beliefs, prejudices, or values
  • Identify improvement goals and strategies
  • Discuss the simulation experience and provide comments and suggestions to student peers
  • Transfer knowledge from the simulation experience to actual clinical practice

Please refer to the Debriefing Session Guidelines and Grading Rubric located in the Course Resource section.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NR 509 Week 5 Assignment: Debriefing Session or Alternate Writing Assignment

NR 509 Week 5 Assignment Alternate Writing Assignment

NOTEYou will complete this alternate writing assignment ONLY if you had not participated or do not plan to participate in a debriefing session for the given week.

As a family nurse practitioner, you must possess excellent physical assessment skills. This alternate writing assignment mirrors the discussion content of the debriefing session and will allow the student to expand their knowledge of physical health assessment principles specific to the advanced practice role.

The purposes of this assignment are to: (a) identify and articulate advanced assessment health history and physical examination techniques which are relevant to a focused body system (CO 1), (b) differentiate normal and abnormal findings with regard to a disease or condition that impacts the body system (CO 2), and (c) adapt advanced assessment skills if necessary to suit the needs of specific patient populations (CO 4).

Please refer to the Alternate Writing Assignment Guidelines and Grading Rubric located in the Course Resource section.

NR 509 Week 5 Assignment: Shadow Health Abdominal Concept Lab

Learn about the elements of an abdominal exam with the Abdominal Concept Lab.

A Sample Answer for The Assignment: NR 509 Week 5 Assignment: Debriefing Session or Alternate Writing Assignment

Title: NR 509 Week 5 Assignment: Debriefing Session or Alternate Writing Assignment

This tool needs to be loaded in a new browser window

NR 509 Week 5 Assignment: Shadow Health Abdominal Pain Physical Assessment Assignment

Rubric

Shadow Health Physical Assessment Rubric
Shadow Health Physical Assessment Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts

Subjective Data, Organization, Communication, and Summary (DCE Score or transcript)

 
 
 

25.0 pts

Above Average- DCE Score greater than or equal to 93; Comprehensive introduction with expectations of exam verbalized; questions worded in a non-judgmental way; professional language exercised; questions well-organized; appropriate closing with summary of findings verbalized to patient.
 
 

21.0 pts

Average- DCE Score greater than or equal to 86-92; Adequate introduction; some questions worded in a non-judgmental way; professional language mostly exercised; questions generally organized; somewhat complete closing.
 
 

10.0 pts

Below Average- DCE Score greater than or equal to 80-85; Incomplete introduction; many questions worded in a judgmental way; some professional language exercised; questions somewhat organized; incomplete closing.
 
 

0.0 pts

Unsatisfactory- DCE Score less than or equal to 79; Introduction missing; questions worded in a judgmental way; little professional language; questions unorganized; closing missing.
 
25.0 pts

Objective Data, Physical Examination, Interpretation of Findings, Assessment, and Documentation

 
 
 

20.0 pts

Above Average- Physical assessment documentation includes all relevant body systems; all pertinent normal and abnormal findings identified; documentation reflects professional language; treatment plan includes each of the following components: diagnostics, medication, education, consultation/referral, and follow-up planning.
 
 

16.0 pts

Average- Physical assessment documentation lacks sufficient details pertaining to one or two relevant body systems; or identifies ≥ 50% of the pertinent normal and abnormal findings; or documentation lacks professional language; or treatment plan lacks one or two components (diagnostics, medication, education, consultation/referral, or follow-up planning).
 
 

8.0 pts

Below Average- Physical assessment documentation lacks sufficient details pertaining to three or more relevant body systems; or identifies < 49% of the pertinent normal and abnormal findings; or documentation includes unprofessional language; or treatment plan lacks three or more components (diagnostics, medication, education, consultation/referral, or follow-up planning).
 
 

0.0 pts

Unsatisfactory- No physical assessment documentation or no treatment plan.
 
20.0 pts

Self-Reflection

 
 
 

5.0 pts

Above Average- Responds to three of the three reflection post questions; and provides analysis of performance; and reflection posts written using professional language; and reflection posts demonstrate insight.
 
 

3.0 pts

Average- Responds to two of the three reflection post questions; or provides limited self-analysis of performance; or reflection posts are somewhat unclear related to the assignment and the student’s experience; or reflection posts lack insight.
 
 

2.0 pts

Below Average- Responds to one of the three reflection post questions; or does not provide self-analysis of performance; or reflections are not related to the assignment and the student’s experience; or does not provide insight
 
 

0.0 pts

Unsatisfactory- No reflection posts for the assignment.
 
5.0 pts
Total Points: 50.0
 
 

NR 509 Week 5 Assignment Week 5: Shadow Health Gastrointestinal Physical Assessment Assignment

Rubric

Shadow Health Physical Assessment Rubric
Shadow Health Physical Assessment Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts

Subjective Data, Organization, Communication, and Summary (DCE Score or transcript)

 
 
 

25.0 pts

Above Average- DCE Score greater than or equal to 93; Comprehensive introduction with expectations of exam verbalized; questions worded in a non-judgmental way; professional language exercised; questions well-organized; appropriate closing with summary of findings verbalized to patient.
 
 

21.0 pts

Average- DCE Score greater than or equal to 86-92; Adequate introduction; some questions worded in a non-judgmental way; professional language mostly exercised; questions generally organized; somewhat complete closing.
 
 

10.0 pts

Below Average- DCE Score greater than or equal to 80-85; Incomplete introduction; many questions worded in a judgmental way; some professional language exercised; questions somewhat organized; incomplete closing.
 
 

0.0 pts

Unsatisfactory- DCE Score less than or equal to 79; Introduction missing; questions worded in a judgmental way; little professional language; questions unorganized; closing missing.
 
25.0 pts

Objective Data, Physical Examination, Interpretation of Findings, Assessment, and Documentation

 
 
 

20.0 pts

Above Average- Physical assessment documentation includes all relevant body systems; all pertinent normal and abnormal findings identified; documentation reflects professional language; treatment plan includes each of the following components: diagnostics, medication, education, consultation/referral, and follow-up planning.
 
 

16.0 pts

Average- Physical assessment documentation lacks sufficient details pertaining to one or two relevant body systems; or identifies ≥ 50% of the pertinent normal and abnormal findings; or documentation lacks professional language; or treatment plan lacks one or two components (diagnostics, medication, education, consultation/referral, or follow-up planning).
 
 

8.0 pts

Below Average- Physical assessment documentation lacks sufficient details pertaining to three or more relevant body systems; or identifies < 49% of the pertinent normal and abnormal findings; or documentation includes unprofessional language; or treatment plan lacks three or more components (diagnostics, medication, education, consultation/referral, or follow-up planning).
 
 

0.0 pts

Unsatisfactory- No physical assessment documentation or no treatment plan.
 
20.0 pts

Self-Reflection

 
 
 

5.0 pts

Above Average- Responds to three of the three reflection post questions; and provides analysis of performance; and reflection posts written using professional language; and reflection posts demonstrate insight.
 
 

3.0 pts

Average- Responds to two of the three reflection post questions; or provides limited self-analysis of performance; or reflection posts are somewhat unclear related to the assignment and the student’s experience; or reflection posts lack insight.
 
 

2.0 pts

Below Average- Responds to one of the three reflection post questions; or does not provide self-analysis of performance; or reflections are not related to the assignment and the student’s experience; or does not provide insight
 
 

0.0 pts

Unsatisfactory- No reflection posts for the assignment.
 
5.0 pts
Total Points: 50.
 

Don’t wait until the last minute

Fill in your requirements and let our experts deliver your work asap.

× Chat with us