NR 392 Week 6 Course Project Milestone 3 Template
NR 392 Week 6 Course Project Milestone 3 Template
NR 392 Week 6 Course Project Milestone 3 Template
Directions:
Prior to completing this template, carefully review Course Project Milestone 3 Guidelines paying particular attention to how to name the document and all rubric requirements. After saving the document to your computer, type your answers directly on this template and save again. This assignment is due by Sunday end of Week 6 by 11:59 p.m. Mountain Time.
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NR 392 Week 6 Course Project Milestone 3 Template
| Assignment Criteria | Answers:
NOTE: See Milestone 3 Rubric for details required in each area. |
| Brief Statement of Nursing Care Issue
15 points |
|
| Improve: Interventions (3) to Improve Quality
120 points (40 points each for 3 interventions) | Intervention #1:
|
| Intervention #2:
| |
| Intervention #3:
| |
| Improve: Professional Article to Support Interventions
75 points (25 points reference and citation; 50 points summary) | Citation must be included with appropriate intervention above. Do NOT type in this box.
|
| Reference:
| |
| Article Summary:
| |
| Control:
Control/ Evaluation
90 points (30 points each for 3 evaluations) | Evaluation for Intervention #1:
|
| Evaluation for Intervention #2:
| |
| Evaluation for Intervention #3:
|
Guidelines and Grading Rubric
Purpose
To apply lessons in quality improvement in nursing to a real world nursing issue. This Course Project will use the Six Sigma DMAIC process.
Course Outcomes
The Course Project enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:
Struggling to Meet Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on NR 392 Week 6 Course Project Milestone 3 Template done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!
CO 1: Identify the role of the BSN nurse in the quality improvement process as a member of the collaborative interprofessional team (PO#2 & 7)
CO 2: Discuss effective processes and strategies to improve quality in nursing (PO#2 & 8)
Points
The entire project is worth 600 points. Milestone 3 is worth 300 points of this total.
Due Date
Submit your completed NR392 Milestone 3 to its Dropbox by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT, end of Week 6.
Requirements and Guidelines
- Carefully review this Milestone 3 Guidelines document including the rubric, as well as the Milestone 3 Template.
- Download the Milestone 3 Template. Save it to your computer in Microsoft Word 2010 (or later) as a .docx file with the file name: Your Last Name NR392 Milestone 3.docx.
- Milestone 3 is a continuation of and builds upon Milestones 1 and 2. See Rubric in this Guidelines document for details about requirements including 3 interventions and evaluation of each.
- A peer-reviewed scholarly professional nursing journal article (not a website) that is appropriate to the nursing care issue must be obtained from CINAHL via the Chamberlain Online Library and must be available in full text. Use APA format to cite and reference this article. You will write a short summary of this article.
- Carefully review the assigned areas for Milestone 3 and type directly on your saved Milestone 3 Template.
- Submit your completed Milestone 3 Template to the Dropbox by Sunday at end of Week 6.
Grading Criteria
| Category | Points | % | Description: See Milestone 3 Rubric for Details |
| Brief Statement of Nursing Care Issue | 15 | 5% | Clearly and briefly state the nursing care issue that is the topic for the course project. |
| I: Interventions (3) to Improve Quality | 120
(40 points each) | 40% | List three (3) detailed appropriate interventions designed to improve the quality of your selected nursing care issue. At least one intervention must be supported by information from the professional article you selected. An APA citation must be included with that intervention. |
| I: Professional Article to Support Interventions | 75
(25 points reference and citation; 50 points summary) | 25% | Provide a reference in APA format for one (1) peer-reviewed scholarly professional nursing journal article retrieved in full text from CINAHL. Provide a citation in APA format with the intervention in the above category that is supported by that article. Write a brief summary of the article using 80-100 words. |
| C: Control/ Evaluation | 90
(30 points each) | 30% | Explain detailed evaluation plans for each of the three interventions listed to identify how you would determine if quality is improved by each intervention. |
| Total | 300 | 100% |
Grading Rubric
| Assignment Criteria | A (100%)
Exceptional
Outstanding or highest level of performance | B (88%)
Exceeds
Very good or high level of performance | C (80%)
Meets
Competent or satisfactory level of performance | NI (38%)
Needs Improvement Poor or failing level of performance | F (0%)
Developing
Unsatisfactory level of performance |
| Brief Statement of Nursing Care Issue
15 points | Clearly and briefly states the nursing care issue that is the topic for the course project.
15 points ☐ | Statement of the nursing care issue is mostly clear and mostly brief.
13 points ☐ | Clarity and/or brevity are only fair for the statement of the nursing care issue.
12 points ☐ | Clarity and brevity are poor. May or may not state the same topic approved from previous milestones.
6 points ☐ | Did not state the nursing care issue.
0 points ☐ |
| I: Intervention #1 to Improve Quality
40 points | Intervention #1 is clearly designed to improve the quality of the nursing care issue. Depth and detail are excellent.
Intervention is very appropriate and very specific to the issue. 40 points ☐ | Intervention is mostly designed to improve the quality of the nursing care issue.
Depth and detail are good. Intervention is mostly appropriate and mostly specific to the issue. 35 points ☐ | Intervention is vaguely designed to improve the quality of the nursing care issue.
Depth and detail are fair. Appropriateness and specificity are only fair. 32 points ☐ | Intervention is poorly designed to improve the quality of the nursing care issue.
Depth and detail are poor. Appropriateness and specificity are poor. 15 points ☐ | Did not submit intervention.
0 points ☐ |
| I: Intervention #2 to Improve Quality
40 points | Intervention #2 is clearly designed to improve the quality of the nursing care issue. Depth and detail are excellent.
Intervention is very appropriate and very specific to the issue. 40 points ☐ | Intervention is mostly designed to improve the quality of the nursing care issue.
Depth and detail are good. Intervention is mostly appropriate and mostly specific to the issue. 35 points ☐ | Intervention is vaguely designed to improve the quality of the nursing care issue.
Depth and detail are fair. Appropriateness and specificity are only fair. 32 points ☐ | Intervention is poorly designed to improve the quality of the nursing care issue.
Depth and detail are poor. Appropriateness and specificity are poor. 15 points ☐ | Did not submit intervention.
0 points ☐ |
| I: Intervention #3 to Improve Quality
40 poin NR 392 Week 6 Course Project Milestone 3 Templatets | Intervention #3 is clearly designed to improve the quality of the nursing care issue. Depth and detail are excellent.
Intervention is very appropriate and very specific to the issue. 40 points ☐ | Intervention is mostly designed to improve the quality of the nursing care issue.
Depth and detail are good. Intervention is mostly appropriate and mostly specific to the issue. 35 points ☐ | Intervention is vaguely designed to improve the quality of the nursing care issue.
Depth and detail are fair. Appropriateness and specificity are only fair. 32 points ☐ | Intervention is poorly designed to improve the quality of the nursing care issue.
Depth and detail are poor. Appropriateness and specificity are poor. 15 points ☐ | Did not submit intervention.
0 points ☐ |
| I: Professional Article to Support Interventions
25 points | Reference and citation for very appropriate peer-reviewed scholarly professional nursing journal article (retrieved from CINAHL and available in full text) are in excellent APA format.
25 points ☐ | Reference and citation for mostly appropriate peer-reviewed scholarly professional nursing journal article (retrieved from CINAHL and available in full text) are in good APA format.
22 points ☐ | Reference and citation for somewhat appropriate peer-reviewed scholarly professional nursing journal article (retrieved from CINAHL and available in full text) are in fair APA format.
20 points each 20 points ☐ | Article is not appropriate to the nursing issue, not peer-reviewed, OR not available in CINAHL in full text.
OR reference and citation use poor APA format. OR may not submit one item (reference or citation). 10 points ☐ | Did not submit an article reference, citation, or summary.
0 points ☐ |
| Summary
50 points | Summary is very clear and thorough in 80-100 words.
50 points ☐ | Summary is mostly clear and thorough in 80-100 words.
44 points ☐ | Summary is fairly clear and thorough in 80-100 words.
40 points ☐ | Summary is unclear and/or not thorough.
19 points ☐ | Did not submit a summary.
0 points ☐ |
| C: Control/
Evaluation #1 30 points | For #1, explains very appropriate evaluation plan.
Evaluation plan has excellent depth and detail regarding how you would determine if quality improved by that intervention. 30 points ☐ | Explains mostly appropriate evaluation plan.
Evaluation plan has good depth and detail regarding how you would determine if quality improved by that intervention. 26 points ☐ | Explains fairly appropriate evaluation plan.
Evaluation plan has fair depth and detail regarding how you would determine if quality improved by that intervention. 24 points ☐ | Plan is not appropriate for the nursing care issue OR plan has poor detail OR plan does not address how quality will be improved.
11 points ☐ | No evaluation plan provided.
0 points ☐ |
| C: Control/
Evaluation #2 30 points | For #2, explains very appropriate evaluation plan.
Evaluation plan has excellent depth and detail regarding how you would determine if quality improved by that intervention. 30 points ☐ | Explains mostly appropriate evaluation plan.
Evaluation plan has good depth and detail regarding how you would determine if quality improved by that intervention. 26 points ☐ | Explains fairly appropriate evaluation plan.
Evaluation plan has fair depth and detail regarding how you would determine if quality improved by that intervention. 24 points ☐ | Plan is not appropriate for the nursing care issue OR plan has poor detail OR plan does not address how quality will be improved.
11 points ☐ | No evaluation plan provided.
0 points ☐ |
| C: Control/
Evaluation #3 30 points | For #3, explains very appropriate evaluation plan.
Evaluation plan has excellent depth and detail regarding how you would determine if quality improved by that intervention. 30 points ☐ | Explains mostly appropriate evaluation plan.
Evaluation plan has good depth and detail regarding how you would determine if quality improved by that intervention. 26 points ☐ | Explains fairly appropriate evaluation plan.
Evaluation plan has fair depth and detail regarding how you would determine if quality improved by that intervention. 24 points ☐ | Plan is not appropriate for the nursing care issue OR plan has poor detail OR plan does not address how quality will be improved.
11 points ☐ | No evaluation plan provided.
0 points ☐ |
| Total Points Possible= 300 | |||||
NR 392 Week 6 Course Project Milestone 3 Template
Don’t wait until the last minute
Fill in your requirements and let our experts deliver your work asap.