NR 391 Week 4 Course Project Milestone 2
Interview Guide and Questions
The purpose of the Course Project is to give the student the opportunity to apply concepts in transcultural nursing by conducting a transcultural nursing assessment. The purpose of Milestone 2 is to develop an interview guide utilizing open-ended questions that will encourage participation by the interviewee.
The completion of the Course Project enables the student to meet the following Course Outcomes.
CO#1: Identify theories, concepts, and beliefs related to transcultural nursing. (PO#1)
Struggling to Meet Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on NR 391 Week 4 Course Project Milestone 2 done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!
CO#2: Communicate effectively with culturally diverse individuals, families, and organizations. (PO #3)
CO#4: Perform a culturally competent nursing assessment. (PO#3)
The entire project is worth 600 points. Milestone 2 is worth 200 points of this total.
You are to submit your completed NR391Milestone2: Interview Questions Form to the Dropbox by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT, at the end of Week 4.
Requirements and Guidelines
1. Review the Course Outcomes for this assignment, which are listed above.
2. Review the directions and best practices found in the Course Project tab, located under Course Home.
3. Research your interviewee’s cultural background prior to developing questions. What impact may the culture have on the interviewee’s physical health, that is, what illnesses and conditions are prevalent in this culture? What are commonly held beliefs about health in the interviewee’s culture of origin that could influence the interviewee’s perception of healthcare and health practices in the current culture? Refer to Appendix A in your text and select five (5) categories upon which you will concentrate for your interview guide and questions.
4. Develop an interview guide and questions with specific initial and follow-up questions. Include questions that reflect an understanding of the categories (Appendix A) that you selected about the influence culture may have on the interviewee.
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NR 391 Week 4 Course Project Milestone 2
5. Review the Differences Between Closed and Open-Ended Questions document in DocSharing entitled. Use the suggestions to formulate your initial and follow-up questions.
6. Download the NR391_Milestone2_Interview_Questions_Form from Doc Sharing.
7. Fill in information about the interview guide and questions using the form. This does not require APA formatting, however, you are expected to write clearly and use proper grammar and spelling.
8. Submit the completed form to the Milestone 2 Dropbox by the Sunday of Week 4 at 11:59 p.m. MT.
9. Prior to submission of Milestone 3, revise the Interview Guide and Questions based on instructor feedback.
NOTE: Do not schedule the interview to occur until after midnight on Friday of Week 5 to allow your instructor time to grade your Milestone 2 Assignment unless you have obtained special permission from your instructor. Do not conduct the interview until after midnight on Friday of Week 5 for the same reasons. If the interviewee’s schedule requires that you conduct the interview before this day and time, consult your instructor regarding early submission of the Interview Guide and Questions to ensure that you receive comments in time to incorporate revisions before the interview. Make sure you obtain his/her permission before proceeding.
In discussions, you, as a student, will interact with your instructor and classmates to explore topics related to the content of this course. You will be graded for the following.
Discussions (graded): Discussions are a critical learning experience in the online classroom. Participation in all discussions is required.
2. Guidelines and Rubric for Discussions
PURPOSE: Threaded discussions are designed to promote dialogue between faculty and students, and students and their peers. In the discussions students:
- Demonstrate understanding of concepts for the week
- Integrate professional resources
- Engage in meaningful and respectful dialogue with classmates
- Express thoughts clearly and logically
Participation Requirement: You are required to post a minimum of two (2) times in each graded thread. These two (2) posts must be on two (2) separate days and the first post in each thread must be completed by 11:59 p.m. MT on Wednesday.
Participation points: If your posts do not meet the participation requirements (above) 20% points will be deducted from a thread. Each thread is graded independently. You will receive a 20% point deduction in each thread if:
- your first post in each thread is not posted by 11:59 p.m. MT on Wednesday, OR
- you do not post a second time in each thread
3. Threaded Discussion Guiding Principles
The ideas and beliefs underpinning the threaded discussions (TDs) guide students through engaging dialogues as they achieve the desired learning outcomes/competencies associated with their course in a manner that empowers them to organize, integrate, apply and critically appraise their knowledge to their selected field of practice. The use of TDs provides students with opportunities to contribute level-appropriate knowledge and experience to the topic in a safe, caring, and fluid environment that models professional and social interaction. The TD’s ebb and flow is based upon the composition of student and faculty interaction in the quest for relevant scholarship. Participation in the TDs generates opportunities for students to actively engage in the written ideas of others by carefully reading, researching, reflecting, and responding to the contributions of their peers and course faculty. TDs foster the development of members into a community of learners as they share ideas and inquiries, consider perspectives that may be different from their own, and integrate knowledge from other disciplines.
4. Participation Guidelines
You are required to post a minimum of two times in each graded thread. These two posts must be on 2 separate days and the first post in each thread must be completed by 11:59 p.m. MT on Wednesday. Discussions for each week close on Sunday at 11:59 p.m. mountain time (MT). To receive credit for a week’s discussion, students may begin posting no earlier than the Sunday immediately before each week opens. For courses with Week 8 graded discussions, the threads will close on Wednesday at 11:59 p.m. MT. All discussion requirements must be met by that deadline.
5. Grading Rubric
Outstanding or highest level of performance
Very good or high level of performance
Competent or satisfactory level of performance
Poor or failing or unsatisfactory level of performance
|Responds to the initial graded threaded discussion question(s)/topic(s), demonstrating knowledge and understanding of concepts for the week based on assigned reading(s) and weekly course lesson. 32% points||Thoroughly answers the initial discussion question(s) applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding regarding all weekly concepts.||Answers the initial discussion question(s) applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding of most of the weekly concepts.||Answers the initial discussion question(s) applying experiences, knowledge, and understanding of some of the weekly concepts.||Does not respond to the initial discussion question(s). Little or no evidence of knowledge or understanding of weekly concepts.|
|Supports ideas and opinions with experiences and resources from assigned reading and/or textbook, and lesson. 24% points||Thoroughly supports ideas and opinions with experiences and resources that include lesson and assigned readings and may also include professional journal articles. Ideas are credited* to the source.||Supports ideas and opinions with experiences and resources that include lesson or assigned readings that are credited* to the source.||Satisfactorily supports ideas and opinions with experiences and resources that mention the lesson or assigned readings but source is not noted.||Little or no support of ideas and opinions with any experiences or resources.|
|Engages in meaningful and respectful dialogue with classmates before the end of the week. 28% points||Responds to classmates and/or instructor by name in a respectful manner speaking to the points already made by others, furthering the dialogue through clarification and additional knowledge, thereby contributing much depth to the discussion.||Usually responds to classmates and/or instructor by name and always in a respectful manner speaking to the points already made by others, furthering the dialogue and adds some depth to the discussion.||Unable to determine to whom the person is speaking but is respectful speaking to the points already made by others, but does not further the discussion.||Responds to classmates and/or instructor in a disrespectful manner or responses are not on topic causing distraction to the discussion.|
|Communicates in a professional manner. 16% points||Presents information using clear and concise language in an organized manner (uses accurate English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation with minimal errors).||Presents information in an organized manner (few errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).||Presents information using understandable language but is somewhat disorganized (many errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation).||Presents information that is not clear, logical, or organized to the point that the reader has difficulty understanding the message (numerous errors in English grammar, spelling, syntax, and/or punctuation).|
|Participation Posts a minimum of two (2) times in each graded thread. These two (2) posts must be on two (2) separate days and the first post in each thread must be completed by 11:59 pm MT on Wednesday. 20% of points are deducted per thread if this criterion is not met. A zero is the lowest score possible per thread and each thread is graded independently.||NO points added or deducted if minimum requirements are met.||Deduct 20% of points if minimum requirements are NOT met.|
|*Credited means stating where the information came from (specific article, text, or lesson). Example: Our text discusses…. The information from our lesson states…. Smith (2010) claimed that….. Mary Manners (personal communication, November 17, 2011)….|
Don’t wait until the last minute
Fill in your requirements and let our experts deliver your work asap.