Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Implementation Plan NUR 590
Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Implementation Plan NUR 590
Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Implementation Plan NUR 590
Implementation Plan
Evidence-based practice has been an important pillar in nursing and patient care settings since, through it, healthcare professionals can offer the most current and evidence-supported patient care services. Therefore, it is important to consistently engage in the evidence-based process for quality and patient care improvement. The evidence-based process has various stages, with each stage important to the whole process. One of the most important stages is the implementation stage (Tucker & Gallagher-Ford, 2019). Therefore, it is important to come up with an implementation plan to act as a guide for implementing a proposed EBP intervention. As part of this project, a PICOT question was formulated, and a comprehensive literature review concerning the PICOT was accomplished. The PICOT focused on using automated fall detectors to reduce the rates of falls among hospitalized patients. Therefore, the purpose of this latest write-up is to formulate an implementation plan to act as a guide for the proposed solution’s implementation.
The Setting and How the Potential Subjects Will Be Accessed
The proposed project involves the use of automated fall detectors to reduce the rates of falls among elderly patients who are at risk of falls. As such, the proposed project’s setting will be an elderly patient care facility admitting patients of 65 years and above for various forms of care. The chosen setting will be appropriate for getting the targeted population as appropriate. The potential subjects for the project are elderly patients 65 years and above admitted to the facility. Every patient admitted to the facility during the study period will form part of the study subjects. Since the project will not deal with patient-identifiable data, there will be no need to obtain informed consent. However, there will be a need to obtain approval from the facility that gives the go-ahead to implement the proposed project.
Assessment Description
In 1,250-1,500 words, discuss the implementation plan for your evidence-based practice project proposal. When required, create the appropriate form, table, image, or graph to fully illustrate that aspect of the intervention plan and include them in an appendix of your paper. You will use the implementation plan, including the associated documents in your appendices, in the Topic 8 assignment, during which you will synthesize the various aspects of your project into a final paper detailing your evidence-based practice project proposal.
Include the following:
- Describe the setting and access to potential subjects. If there is a need for a consent or approval form, then one must be created. Include a draft of the form as an appendix at the end of your paper.
- Create a timeline. Make sure the timeline is general enough that it can be implemented at any date. Based on the timeline you created, describe the amount oftime needed to complete this project. Include a draft of the timeline as an appendix at the end of your paper.
- Develop a budget and resource list. Consider the clinical tools or process changes that would need to take place. Based on the budget and resource list you developed: (a) describe the resources (human, fiscal, and other) or changes needed in the implementation of the solution; (b) outline the costs for personnel, consumable supplies, equipment (if not provided by the institute), computer-related costs (librarian consultation, database access, etc.), and other costs (travel, presentation development). Include a draft of the budget and resource list as an appendix at the end of your paper.
- Explain whether you would select a qualitative or quantitative design to collect data and evaluate the effectiveness of your evidence-based practice project proposal. Provide rationale to support your selection.
- Describe the methods and instruments (questionnaire, scale, or test) to be used for monitoring the implementation of the proposed solution. Include the method or instrument as an appendix at the end of your paper.
- Explain the process for delivering the intervention and indicate if any training will be needed.
- Discuss the stakeholders that are needed to implement the plan.
- Consider all of the aspects of your implementation plan and discuss potential barriers or challenges to the plan. Propose strategies for overcoming these.
- Establish the feasibility of the implementation plan.
Click here ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER ASSIGNMENT on Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Implementation Plan NUR 590
Refer to the “Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal – Assignment Overview” document for an overview of the evidence-based practice project proposal assignments.
You are required to cite a minimum of five peer-reviewed sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.
Complete the “APA Writing Checklist” to ensure that your paper adheres to APA style and formatting criteria and general guidelines for academic writing. Include the completed checklist as an appendix at the end of your paper.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
What are some of the obstacles or barriers to implementing evidence-based practice (EBP) in nursing? Explain how at least one of the obstacles you have described could impact the implementation for your EBP project.
Barriers to evidence-based practice research can prevent research from reaching potential. Barriers that involve resource management, interdisciplinary involvement and lack of support are common in evidence-based practice research in varying levels depending on the research setting or question being explored. Building research within a medical center has its benefits as well as its barriers to obtaining research goals for health outcomes. Health related education especially can sometimes take a back seat to patient care interventions in terms of implementation of research (Swindle, Johnson, Davenport, Whiteside-Mansell, Thirunavukarasu, Sadavsin & Curran, 2019)
One barrier that I would predict would interfere with the implementation process deals with interdisciplinary communication for educational purposes. Although using education can be used to disseminate information to health care providers and the public, interdisciplinary information and coordination may make this difficult. This would impact my project because coordinating with nutrition and educational departments will become very important to the research outcomes and the amount of involvement or coordination may revolve around the ability to utilize these connections with other disciplines (Shayan, Kiwanuka & Nakaye, 2019).
Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Implementation Plan NUR 590 References:
Swindle, T., Johnson, S. L., Davenport, K., Whiteside-Mansell, L., Thirunavukarasu, T., Sadasavin, G., & Curran, G. M. (2019). A Mixed-Methods Exploration of Barriers and Facilitators to Evidence-Based Practices for Obesity Prevention in Head Start. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 51(9), 1067–1079. https://doi-org.lopes.idm.oclc.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2019.06.019
Shayan, S. J., Kiwanuka, F., & Nakaye, Z. (2019). Barriers Associated With Evidence‐Based Practice Among Nurses in Low‐ and Middle‐Income Countries: A Systematic Review. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 16(1), 12–20. https://doi-org.lopes.idm.oclc.org/10.1111/wvn.12337
Identify two stakeholder barriers you might experience during the implementation phase of your evidence-based practice project. What strategies can you implement to gain stakeholder support for the project implementation. Provide a suggestion you would give to a colleague who is struggling with obtaining stakeholder support.
Cohesive Collaboration is important to the survival of and success of an organization. Implementation plans can face numerous challenges as a result of lack of knowledge of the problems hurting an organization. This lack of knowledge is common in many organizations were leaders and management are disconnected from day to day operations that help to run the organization. When a person rises through the ranks of the organization into a leadership role they have knowledge of and experience that other managers lack if they hired from the outside. The person who rises through the ranks has more understanding of the how the organization works, the weakness that exist, the organizations strength and how the organization needs to function in order to survive. Where there is s disconnect between stakeholders in higher positions and those working the day to day operations, noting will get done.
Some of the things that one might experience during the implementation phase are resistance and timing. “Lack of time is often cited as a barrier to implementing EBP. In addition, uncertainty or lack of knowledge about the EBP process is also a barrier, which includes critiquing and appraising the literature related to the clinical problem being addressed” (Ginex, 2018). In busy hospitals lack of time to study and understand new changes and policies can be a barrier. On time of this, resistance to change can also be a barrier. In there is already a flow that nurses are accustomed to even if it is chaotic, having to change that flow requires learning something new or changing ones workflow habits and that can cause resistance to change.
The one suggestion I would give to a fellow colleague would be for them to ask questions, slow down the pace in order for them to understand the new policy and give themselves time to become accustom to it and to always remember that it will take them time to learn something new before they can master it.
Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Implementation Plan NUR 590 Reference:
Ginex, P. (2018). Overcome Barriers to Applying an Evidence-Based Process for Practice Change. Retrieved from https://voice.ons.org/news-and-views/overcome-barriers-to-applying-an-evidence-based-process-for-practice-change
Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Implementation Plan NUR 590 – Rubric
Setting and Access to Potential Subjects
Criteria Description
Description of setting and access to potential subjects; consent or approval form is attached in an appendix, if needed.
5. 5: Excellent
8.4 points
The setting and access to potential subjects are clearly described. A well-developed and accurate consent or approval form is attached correctly in an appendix.
4. 4: Good
7.73 points
The setting and access to potential subjects are described. A consent or approval form is needed and attached in an appendix. Minor revision may be needed on the form or to correct formatting issues in the appendix. Some detail is needed for clarity or accuracy.
3. 3: Satisfactory
7.39 points
The setting and access to potential subjects are generally described. Some additional information is needed. A consent or approval form is attached but requires some revision; the form is attached in an appendix but has formatting errors.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
6.72 points
The setting and access to potential subjects are only partially described. A consent or approval form is attached but contains significant errors; the form is not attached in an appendix.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
The setting and access to potential subjects are not described. A consent or approval form needs to be created and attached in an appendix. Revision is needed.
Timeline
CrIteria Description
Description of time required; draft of timeline is attached in an appendix.
5. 5: Excellent
9.6 points
The amount of time needed to complete this project is clearly described and general enough to be implemented at any date. A well-developed timeline is attached correctly in an appendix.
4. 4: Good
8.83 points
The amount of time needed to complete this project is described and general enough to be implemented at any date. Minor revision may be needed on the timeline, or to correct formatting issues in the Appendix. Some detail is needed for clarity or accuracy.
3. 3: Satisfactory
8.45 points
The amount of time needed to complete this project is generally described. Some additional information is needed. A timeline is attached but requires some revision; the timeline is attached in an appendix but has formatting errors.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
7.68 points
The amount of time needed to complete this project is only partially described. A timeline is attached but contains significant errors; the timeline is not attached in an appendix.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
The amount of time needed to complete this project is not described. A timeline needs to be created and attached in an appendix. Revision is needed.
Budget and Resource List
Criteria Description
Description of resources or changes required; outline of cost and budget and resource list are attached in an appendix.
5. 5: Excellent
9.6 points
A detailed description of resources or changes needed and outline of costs are clearly presented. A well-developed budget and resource list are attached correctly in an appendix.
4. 4: Good
8.83 points
Description of resources or changes needed and outline of costs are presented. Minor revision maybe needed on the budget or resource list, or to correct formatting issues in the appendix. Some detail is needed for clarity or accuracy.
3. 3: Satisfactory
8.45 points
Description of resources or changes needed and outline of costs are generally presented. Some additional information is needed. A budget and resource list are attached but require some revision; the list is attached in an appendix but has formatting errors.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
7.68 points
Description of resources or changes needed and outline of costs are partially presented. A budget and resource list are attached but contain significant errors; the list is not attached in an appendix.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Description of resources or changes needed and outline of costs are omitted. A budget and resource list need to be created and attached in an appendix. Revision is needed.
Research Design
Criteria Description
Quantitative or qualitative design to collect data and evaluate effectiveness.
5. 5: Excellent
8.4 points
A research design is selected. A thorough explanation for how the design will be used to collect data and evaluate effectiveness of the evidence-based practice project proposal is presented. Strong rationale is provided for support.
4. 4: Good
7.73 points
A research design is selected. An explanation of how the design will be used to collect data and evaluate effectiveness of the evidence-based practice project proposal is presented. Adequate rationale is provided for support.
3. 3: Satisfactory
7.39 points
A research design is selected. A general explanation of how the design will be used to collect data and evaluate effectiveness of the evidence-based practice project proposal is presented. More rational is needed for support.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
6.72 points
A research design is selected. It is unclear how the design will be used to collect data and evaluate effectiveness of the evidence-based practice project proposal.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Research design is not selected.
Methods and Instruments

Struggling to Meet Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Implementation Plan NUR 590 done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!
Criteria Description
Methods or instruments used for monitoring implementation.
5. 5: Excellent
8.4 points
The methods or instruments used for monitoring the implementation of the proposed solution are described. Minor revision may be needed for the methods or instruments, or to correct formatting issues in the appendix. Some detail is needed for clarity or accuracy.
4. 4: Good
7.73 points
The methods or instruments used for monitoring the implementation of the proposed solution are thoroughly described. The methods or instruments are accurate and correctly attached in an appendix.
3. 3: Satisfactory
7.39 points
The methods or instruments used for monitoring the implementation of the proposed solution are summarized, but more information is needed. The methods or instruments are attached but require some revision; the list is attached in an appendix but has formatting errors.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
6.72 points
The methods or instruments used for monitoring the implementation of the proposed solution are only partially discussed. A methods or instruments are attached but contain significant errors; the methods or instruments are not attached in an appendix.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
The methods or instruments are omitted. The methods or instruments need to be created and attached in an appendix.
Process for Delivering Intervention and Needed Training
Criteria Description
Process for Delivering Intervention and Needed Training
5. 5: Excellent
8.4 points
The process for delivering the intervention and any needed training is summarized. More information or support is needed.
4. 4: Good
7.73 points
The process for delivering the intervention and any needed training is explained. Some detail is needed for clarity or accuracy.
3. 3: Satisfactory
7.39 points
The process for delivering the intervention and any needed training is thoroughly explained. Strong rationale is provided for support.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
6.72 points
The process for delivering the intervention is only partially described.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
The process for delivering the intervention is omitted.
Stakeholders for Implementation
Criteria Description
Stakeholders for Implementation
5. 5: Excellent
8.4 points
A thorough discussion of stakeholders needed to implement the plan is presented. Strong rationale is provided for support.
4. 4: Good
7.73 points
Stakeholders needed to implement the plan are omitted.
3. 3: Satisfactory
7.39 points
A summary of stakeholders needed to implement the plan is presented. More information or support is needed.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
6.72 points
An adequate discussion of stakeholders needed to implement the plan is presented. Some detail is needed for clarity or accuracy.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
The discussion of stakeholders needed to implement the plan is incomplete.
Barriers or Challenges to Plan and Strategies for Overcoming
Criteria Description
Barriers or Challenges to Plan and Strategies for Overcoming
5. 5: Excellent
8.4 points
Potential barriers or challenges to the implementation plan are thoroughly discussed and clear strategies for overcoming these are proposed. Strong rationale is provided for support.
4. 4: Good
7.73 points
Potential barriers or challenges to the implementation plan are discussed and strategies for overcoming these are proposed. Some detail is needed for clarity or accuracy.
3. 3: Satisfactory
7.39 points
Potential barriers or challenges to the implementation plan are only partially discussed.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
6.72 points
Potential barriers or challenges to the implementation plan are summarized. General strategies for overcoming these are presented.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Potential barriers or challenges to the implementation plan are not discussed.
Evidence of Feasibility
Criteria Description
Evidence of Feasibility
5. 5: Excellent
8.4 points
The feasibility of the implementation plan is thoroughly discussed. Strong rationale is provided for support.
4. 4: Good
7.73 points
The feasibility of the implementation plan is only partially discussed.
3. 3: Satisfactory
7.39 points
The feasibility of the implementation plan is discussed. Some detail is needed for clarity or accuracy.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
6.72 points
The feasibility of the implementation plan is outlined. More information or support is needed to demonstrate the feasibility of the plan.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
The feasibility of the implementation plan is not discussed.
Required Sources
Criteria Description
Required Sources
5. 5: Excellent
6 points
Number of required resources is met. Sources are current and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.
4. 4: Good
5.52 points
Number of required sources is met. Sources are current, but not all sources are appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.
3. 3: Satisfactory
5.28 points
Number of required sources is met, but sources are outdated or inappropriate.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
4.8 points
Number of required sources is only partially met.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Sources are not included.
Thesis Development and Purpose
Criteria Description
Thesis Development and Purpose
5. 5: Excellent
8.4 points
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
4. 4: Good
7.73 points
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
3. 3: Satisfactory
7.39 points
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
6.72 points
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Argument Logic and Construction
Criteria Description
Argument Logic and Construction
5. 5: Excellent
9.6 points
Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
4. 4: Good
8.83 points
Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.
3. 3: Satisfactory
8.45 points
Argument is orderly but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
7.68 points
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
Mechanics of Writing
Criteria Description
Mechanics of Writing Includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use.
5. 5: Excellent
6 points
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.
4. 4: Good
5.52 points
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
3. 3: Satisfactory
5.28 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
4.8 points
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.
Paper Format
Criteria Description
Paper Format Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment.
5. 5: Excellent
6 points
All format elements are correct.
4. 4: Good
5.52 points
Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
3. 3: Satisfactory
5.28 points
Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
4.8 points
Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.
Documentation of Sources
Criteria Description
Documentation of Sources Citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style.
5. 5: Excellent
6 points
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
4. 4: Good
5.52 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.
3. 3: Satisfactory
5.28 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
4.8 points
Sources are not documented.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
Resources
Improving 3-Hour Sepsis Bundled Care Outcomes: Implementation of a Nurse-Driven Sepsis Protocol in the Emergency Department
Read “Improving 3-Hour Sepsis Bundled Care Outcomes: Implementation of a Nurse-Driven Sepsis Protocol in the Emergency Department,” by Moor
…
30 Safe Practices for Better Health Care
Read “30 Safe Practices for Better Health Care,” located in the Archive section of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) we
…
Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing and Healthcare: A Guide to Best Practice
Review Chapter 1 in Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing and Healthcare: A Guide to Best Practice.
Implementation Science Training and Resources for Nurses and Nurse Scientists
Read “Implementation Science Training and Resources for Nurses and Nurse Scientists,” by Boehm, Stolldorf, and Jeffery, from Journal of
…
Center for Theory of Change
Explore the Center for Theory of Change website.
Advanced Nursing Research: From Theory to Practice
Read Chapter 25 in Advanced Nursing Research: From Theory to Practice.
Advanced Practice Nursing: Essential Knowledge for the Profession
Read Chapter 20 in Advanced Practice Nursing: Essential Knowledge for the Profession.
Strategies, Facilitators and Barriers to Implementation of Evidence-Based Practice in Community Nursing: A Systematic Mixed-Studies Review and Qualitative Synthesis
Read “Strategies, Facilitators and Barriers to Implementation of Evidence-Based Practice in Community Nursing: A Systematic Mixed-Studies Revie
…
The Teach Back Project: A System-Wide Evidence Based Practice
Read “The Teach Back Project: A System-Wide Evidence Based Practice,” by Klingbeil and Gibson, from Journal of Pediatric Nursing (
…
Identify two stakeholder barriers you might experience during the implementation phase of your evidence-based practice project. What strategies can you implement to gain stakeholder support for the project implementation. Provide a suggestion you would give to a colleague who is struggling with obtaining stakeholder support.
Stakeholders are the people involved in carrying out the process under review or individuals who become affected with the change in practice (“John Hopkins Nursing”, 2021). It is important to determine the potential stakeholder barriers that will be encountered in order to address them accordingly. The two stakeholder barriers that can be experienced are resistance to change and lack of authority. Physicians, who are one of the main stakeholders, are perceived to be the least supportive in EBP implementation (Jordan et al., 2021). Without their support, it can make the implementation process difficult. Resistance of practitioners to change from traditional practices to newer concepts introduced in EBP can be a barrier to the implementation process (Jordan et al., 2021). Moreover, some staff nurses feel that they lack authority to make changes in their unit or they do not have the “power” to implement the EBP project. One study suggested that majority of the nurses in a private ICU reported that they lacked the authority to change practice in order to facilitate the implementation of EBP (Jordan et al., 2021).
There are several strategies to gain stakeholder support. First, the support of physicians for the implementation of EBP should be encouraged (Jordan et al., 2021). It is important to keep an open communication between the researcher and physicians. Explaining the goals and benefits of the EBP project in improving patient care can help gain their support. Second, it is recommended to carefully identify individual barriers versus organizational barriers at an early stage (Jordan et al., 2021). Lastly, identifying your stakeholders as well as engaging them early in the EBP process is important because stakeholder buy-in is important for its successful implementation (“John Hopkins Nursing”, 2021). The goal is to gain their trust and confidence and gain as much support as possible for the successful project implementation.
Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Implementation Plan NUR 590 References
Jordan, P., Bowers, C., Cur, M. & Morton, D. (2016). Barriers to implementing evidence-based practice in a
private intensive care unit in the eastern cape. SAJCC, 32(2). DOI:10.7196/SAJCC.2016.v32i2.253
“John Hopkins Nursing”. (2021). Upstate Medical University. https://guides.upstate.edu/c.php?g=1023176&p=7411256
Evidence-based practice (EBP) implementation involves actualizing ideas or best practices established by providers through their research. The implementation process entails several aspects that must be followed systematically to integrate a best practice identified in the research. In this case, the implementation plan focuses on the use of Fall TIPS (tailoring interventions for patient safety) as a bundled care approach to reduce and prevent the occurrence of falls among hospitalized adult patients in medical-surgical units by 20% within six months. Studies and evidence from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) (2021) show that the Fall TIPS toolkit optimizes patient and family efforts in reducing falls. The implementation plan focuses on different aspects of executing the intervention for effective patient care quality delivery and outcomes. The purpose of this paper is to describe the implementation plan of the EBP project propose by exploring the different components of the plan, from setting to timelines and resources, methods and instruments as well as the interventions of the delivery process and barriers.
Setting and Access to Potential Subjects
The project’s setting is the medical-surgical ward with patients who are susceptible to falls due to their health status. The medical-surgical ward provides services to patients recovering from surgical procedures and a majority are susceptible to falls because of being weak. Patients in the unit will all be potential subjects (Barber, 2018). However, only those who will provide their informed consent voluntarily will be part of the subjects. The consent will be critical as it demonstrates their free will to be part of the project to reduce falls.
Timelines
The implementation timeline will be six months. The timeline will have different aspects that include creating an inter-professional collaboration team comprising all providers including nurses, nurse managers, and physicians. The initial week will be about planning and project requirement identification as well as the selection of research design. Nurse training will also happen in the first week on various aspects of the evaluation of the project. The entire activities and components of the time are in the appendix section of the paper.
Resources Required
Effective implementation of an evidence-based practice (EBP) project requires access to and availability of required resources. The EBP project will require resources from organizational leaders and managers as well as sufficient financial resources to implement Fall TIPs as an intervention in the facility to reduce falls (DeNisco, 2019). Human resources for the project will entail nurses, and trainers on the Fall TIPS as a bundled care approach and management. Financial resources for the project will be critical to facilitate training, purchase of required materials and equipment, especially technologies, and installation of the various components of the Fall TIPS. Nurses will require resources to produce informational sheets, enter key data on patients’ health status in electronic health records, and communicate within the setting.
Qualitative or Quantitative Design in Collecting Data and Effectiveness
The project will use a qualitative approach to collect data and perspectives from participants. Falls remain a critical health issue because the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) describes them as never events implying that facilities cannot be compensated for resources used in fall prevention efforts. Using a qualitative design is essential as it allows researchers to deploy techniques that include interviews, focus groups, observation, and literature through systematic review (DeNisco, 2019). The qualitative method would be effective for the proposed project as providers will implement a host of interventions that include fall risk assessment, safe ambulation, safe toileting, effective staff communication, early warning, and patient education. The use of different interventions means that providers will collect data, thoughts, experiences, and perspectives from patients and offer education or awareness information on the best strategies to address falls. Observation of the effects of each intervention would also be tabulated and focus groups will be established to implement certain aspects to assess the overall effectiveness of the Fall TIPS.
The proposed EBP project proposal focuses on reducing and preventing patient falls in the medical-surgical unit among adults. Through these interventions, providers will work collaboratively with all healthcare workers, patients, and their families to reduce the burden of falls by customizing the interventions based on patient needs (Dykes et al., 2018). As such, the project would be effective as it will help improve the quality of care for these patients, improve understanding of the efficacy of each intervention, and allow organizations to get reimbursement from CMS for quality improvement by reducing patient falls.
Monitoring Methods and Instruments
The project will have different methods and instruments or tools to monitor overall results for patients and the medical-surgical unit and the nurses. The team will use an audit tool and a patient satisfaction survey during the implementation process. The satisfaction survey will involve the research participants giving their opinions and perspectives on the overall efficacy of the different interventions. For instance, participants will identify an intervention that is suitable to their condition (Rebekah & Ravindran, 2018). The audit tool will assess the overall level of implementation of the different approaches and those that work for certain types of patients based on their conditions. Through these tools, stakeholders will evaluate the common effects of the Fall TIPS in improving patients’ overall mobility during their stay in the unit.
Intervention Delivery Process
Delivering the intervention will entail having an inter-professional team comprising different healthcare workers in the medical-surgical unit, especially nurses and other specialty nurses like anesthetists and those specializing in areas like ambulation, and data. The intervention will include having staff training on all aspects of the Fall TIPS, developing approaches to safe toileting, effective communication, and patient education. Patients and their families will get the education and know the possible signs of falls, and learn to use bed alarms where necessary, while nurses will learn and apply risk assessment approaches to the issue to ensure effective implementation.
Stakeholders Needed to Implementing the Plan
Stakeholders play a crucial role in the implementation of evidence-based practice project proposal since they offer resources, input, and feedback, collaborate to have a common goal and implement the recommended intervention to improve the quality of care and patient outcomes. The project will require a host of stakeholders, especially internal (Heng et al., 2020). These would include nurses, nurse leaders and managers, project team and trainers, patients and their families, organizational management, and health information technology vendors. The nurses, nurse leaders, and managers will implement the different parts of the Fall TIPS intervention while the project will be in charge of all actions, activities, and timelines for effective deliverables (Tang, 2019). Patients and families will be the beneficiaries of these interventions and will require knowledge as well as skills to improve their gait, mobility, and overall functioning. The organizational management and leaders will offer the resources needed to implement the project and support it.
Aspects of the Implementation Plan: Barriers, Challenges, and Proposed Strategies
The entire success of this EBP project proposal will rely on how stakeholders, especially the project manager, and team, handle different components of the initiative. The EBP implementation will encounter barriers that include resistance to change, limited resources, the need for organizational leaders’ support, and insufficient knowledge and skills by nurses on Fall TIPS (Pop et al., 2020). As such, the project will require facilitators who include organizational leaders and managers, nurse leaders, and change champions who will motivate others to accept the use of Fall TIPS as a bundled care approach to reduce and prevent falls in the medical-surgical unit.
The management and project team should take an active role and integrate all stakeholders in the project. This requires effective communication and the application of models like Lewin’s change theory for employees to accept and embrace change. The integration and involvement of all nurses will ensure that the project attains its intended purpose. Again, predictable timelines would be critical for the success of this project.
Feasibility of the Project
The feasibility of the Fall TIPS intervention is high based on its cost-benefit analysis and approach. The cost incurred in implementing the intervention will be estimated and evaluate overall benefits that will accrue to patients and healthcare organizations, especially the medical-surgical unit (Tang, 2019). Based on the cost of implementation and the associated benefit compared to the effects of falls, the facility and unit will implement the Fall TIPS to reduce and prevent falls while improving the quality of care offered to patients.
Conclusion
Implementing this proposed EBP project to reduce and prevent falls in the medical-surgical unit will be critical to improving the quality of care offered to patients. Through the elaborate stages, stakeholders will assess the overall positive effects of the Fall TIPS intervention to reduce falls and improve the quality of life and patient outcomes. The implementation will focus on ensuring that all healthcare providers in the facility participate and develop a common goal to improve care provision. The Fall TIPS framework will help the unit reduce fall rates and improve the overall quality of care and patient satisfaction.
Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Implementation Plan NUR 590 References
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) (2021). Fall TIPS: A Patient-Centered
Fall Prevention Toolkit. https://www.ahrq.gov/patient-safety/settings/hospital/fall-tips/index.html
Dykes, P. C., Adelman, J. S., Alfieri, L., Bogaisky, M., Carroll, D., Carter, E., … & Spivack, L.
- (2019). The fall TIPS (tailoring interventions for patient safety) program: A collaboration to end the persistent problem of patient Falls. Nurse Leader, 17(4), 365-370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mnl.2018.11.006
Barber, B. (2018). Research on human subjects: Problems of social control in medical
experimentation. Routledge.
DeNisco, S. M. (2019). Advanced Practice Nursing: Essential Knowledge for the Profession:
Essential Knowledge for the Profession. Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Heng, H., Jazayeri, D., Shaw, L., Kiegaldie, D., Hill, A. M., & Morris, M. E. (2020). Hospital
falls prevention with patient education: a scoping review. BMC Geriatrics, 20, 1-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-020-01515-w
Pop, H., Lamb, K., Livesay, S., Altman, P., Sanchez, A., & Nora, M. E. (2020). Tailoring a
comprehensive bundled intervention for ED fall prevention. Journal of emergency nursing, 46(2), 225-232. DOI: 10.1016/j.jen.2019.11.010.
Ratnapalan, S. (2019). 37 Leading and managing change in healthcare organizations. BMJ
Evidence-based practice (EBP) implementation involves actualizing ideas or best practices established by providers through their research. The implementation process entails several aspects that must be followed systematically to integrate a best practice identified in the research. In this case, the implementation plan focuses on the use of Fall TIPS (tailoring interventions for patient safety) as a bundled care approach to reduce and prevent the occurrence of falls among hospitalized adult patients in medical-surgical units by 20% within six months. Studies and evidence from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) (2021) show that the Fall TIPS toolkit optimizes patient and family efforts in reducing falls. The implementation plan focuses on different aspects of executing the intervention for effective patient care quality delivery and outcomes. The purpose of this paper is to describe the implementation plan of the EBP project propose by exploring the different components of the plan, from setting to timelines and resources, methods and instruments as well as the interventions of the delivery process and barriers.
Setting and Access to Potential Subjects
The project’s setting is the medical-surgical ward with patients who are susceptible to falls due to their health status. The medical-surgical ward provides services to patients recovering from surgical procedures and a majority are susceptible to falls because of being weak. Patients in the unit will all be potential subjects (Barber, 2018). However, only those who will provide their informed consent voluntarily will be part of the subjects. The consent will be critical as it demonstrates their free will to be part of the project to reduce falls.
Timelines
The implementation timeline will be six months. The timeline will have different aspects that include creating an inter-professional collaboration team comprising all providers including nurses, nurse managers, and physicians. The initial week will be about planning and project requirement identification as well as the selection of research design. Nurse training will also happen in the first week on various aspects of the evaluation of the project. The entire activities and components of the time are in the appendix section of the paper.
Resources Required
Effective implementation of an evidence-based practice (EBP) project requires access to and availability of required resources. The EBP project will require resources from organizational leaders and managers as well as sufficient financial resources to implement Fall TIPs as an intervention in the facility to reduce falls (DeNisco, 2019). Human resources for the project will entail nurses, and trainers on the Fall TIPS as a bundled care approach and management. Financial resources for the project will be critical to facilitate training, purchase of required materials and equipment, especially technologies, and installation of the various components of the Fall TIPS. Nurses will require resources to produce informational sheets, enter key data on patients’ health status in electronic health records, and communicate within the setting.
Qualitative or Quantitative Design in Collecting Data and Effectiveness
The project will use a qualitative approach to collect data and perspectives from participants. Falls remain a critical health issue because the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) describes them as never events implying that facilities cannot be compensated for resources used in fall prevention efforts. Using a qualitative design is essential as it allows researchers to deploy techniques that include interviews, focus groups, observation, and literature through systematic review (DeNisco, 2019). The qualitative method would be effective for the proposed project as providers will implement a host of interventions that include fall risk assessment, safe ambulation, safe toileting, effective staff communication, early warning, and patient education. The use of different interventions means that providers will collect data, thoughts, experiences, and perspectives from patients and offer education or awareness information on the best strategies to address falls. Observation of the effects of each intervention would also be tabulated and focus groups will be established to implement certain aspects to assess the overall effectiveness of the Fall TIPS.
The proposed EBP project proposal focuses on reducing and preventing patient falls in the medical-surgical unit among adults. Through these interventions, providers will work collaboratively with all healthcare workers, patients, and their families to reduce the burden of falls by customizing the interventions based on patient needs (Dykes et al., 2018). As such, the project would be effective as it will help improve the quality of care for these patients, improve understanding of the efficacy of each intervention, and allow organizations to get reimbursement from CMS for quality improvement by reducing patient falls.
Monitoring Methods and Instruments
The project will have different methods and instruments or tools to monitor overall results for patients and the medical-surgical unit and the nurses. The team will use an audit tool and a patient satisfaction survey during the implementation process. The satisfaction survey will involve the research participants giving their opinions and perspectives on the overall efficacy of the different interventions. For instance, participants will identify an intervention that is suitable to their condition (Rebekah & Ravindran, 2018). The audit tool will assess the overall level of implementation of the different approaches and those that work for certain types of patients based on their conditions. Through these tools, stakeholders will evaluate the common effects of the Fall TIPS in improving patients’ overall mobility during their stay in the unit.
Intervention Delivery Process
Delivering the intervention will entail having an inter-professional team comprising different healthcare workers in the medical-surgical unit, especially nurses and other specialty nurses like anesthetists and those specializing in areas like ambulation, and data. The intervention will include having staff training on all aspects of the Fall TIPS, developing approaches to safe toileting, effective communication, and patient education. Patients and their families will get the education and know the possible signs of falls, and learn to use bed alarms where necessary, while nurses will learn and apply risk assessment approaches to the issue to ensure effective implementation.
Stakeholders Needed to Implementing the Plan
Stakeholders play a crucial role in the implementation of evidence-based practice project proposal since they offer resources, input, and feedback, collaborate to have a common goal and implement the recommended intervention to improve the quality of care and patient outcomes. The project will require a host of stakeholders, especially internal (Heng et al., 2020). These would include nurses, nurse leaders and managers, project team and trainers, patients and their families, organizational management, and health information technology vendors. The nurses, nurse leaders, and managers will implement the different parts of the Fall TIPS intervention while the project will be in charge of all actions, activities, and timelines for effective deliverables (Tang, 2019). Patients and families will be the beneficiaries of these interventions and will require knowledge as well as skills to improve their gait, mobility, and overall functioning. The organizational management and leaders will offer the resources needed to implement the project and support it.
Aspects of the Implementation Plan: Barriers, Challenges, and Proposed Strategies
The entire success of this EBP project proposal will rely on how stakeholders, especially the project manager, and team, handle different components of the initiative. The EBP implementation will encounter barriers that include resistance to change, limited resources, the need for organizational leaders’ support, and insufficient knowledge and skills by nurses on Fall TIPS (Pop et al., 2020). As such, the project will require facilitators who include organizational leaders and managers, nurse leaders, and change champions who will motivate others to accept the use of Fall TIPS as a bundled care approach to reduce and prevent falls in the medical-surgical unit.
The management and project team should take an active role and integrate all stakeholders in the project. This requires effective communication and the application of models like Lewin’s change theory for employees to accept and embrace change. The integration and involvement of all nurses will ensure that the project attains its intended purpose. Again, predictable timelines would be critical for the success of this project.
Feasibility of the Project
The feasibility of the Fall TIPS intervention is high based on its cost-benefit analysis and approach. The cost incurred in implementing the intervention will be estimated and evaluate overall benefits that will accrue to patients and healthcare organizations, especially the medical-surgical unit (Tang, 2019). Based on the cost of implementation and the associated benefit compared to the effects of falls, the facility and unit will implement the Fall TIPS to reduce and prevent falls while improving the quality of care offered to patients.
Conclusion
Implementing this proposed EBP project to reduce and prevent falls in the medical-surgical unit will be critical to improving the quality of care offered to patients. Through the elaborate stages, stakeholders will assess the overall positive effects of the Fall TIPS intervention to reduce falls and improve the quality of life and patient outcomes. The implementation will focus on ensuring that all healthcare providers in the facility participate and develop a common goal to improve care provision. The Fall TIPS framework will help the unit reduce fall rates and improve the overall quality of care and patient satisfaction.
Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Implementation Plan NUR 590 References
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) (2021). Fall TIPS: A Patient-Centered
Fall Prevention Toolkit. https://www.ahrq.gov/patient-safety/settings/hospital/fall-tips/index.html
Dykes, P. C., Adelman, J. S., Alfieri, L., Bogaisky, M., Carroll, D., Carter, E., … & Spivack, L.
- (2019). The fall TIPS (tailoring interventions for patient safety) program: A collaboration to end the persistent problem of patient Falls. Nurse Leader, 17(4), 365-370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mnl.2018.11.006
Barber, B. (2018). Research on human subjects: Problems of social control in medical
experimentation. Routledge.
DeNisco, S. M. (2019). Advanced Practice Nursing: Essential Knowledge for the Profession:
Essential Knowledge for the Profession. Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Heng, H., Jazayeri, D., Shaw, L., Kiegaldie, D., Hill, A. M., & Morris, M. E. (2020). Hospital
falls prevention with patient education: a scoping review. BMC Geriatrics, 20, 1-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-020-01515-w
Pop, H., Lamb, K., Livesay, S., Altman, P., Sanchez, A., & Nora, M. E. (2020). Tailoring a
comprehensive bundled intervention for ED fall prevention. Journal of emergency nursing, 46(2), 225-232. DOI: 10.1016/j.jen.2019.11.010.
Ratnapalan, S. (2019). 37 Leading and managing change in healthcare organizations. BMJ
Leader, 3(Suppl 1), A14-A14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/leader-2019-FMLM.37
Rebekah, G., & Ravindran, V. (2018). Statistical analysis in nursing research. Indian Journal of
Continuing Nursing Education, 19(1), 62.
Tang, K. N. (2019). Change management. In Leadership and Change Management (pp. 47–55).
Springer, Singapore.
Leader, 3(Suppl 1), A14-A14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/leader-2019-FMLM.37
Rebekah, G., & Ravindran, V. (2018). Statistical analysis in nursing research. Indian Journal of
Continuing Nursing Education, 19(1), 62.
Tang, K. N. (2019). Change management. In Leadership and Change Management (pp. 47–55).
Springer, Singapore.
Implementation Plan
Evidence-based practice has been an important pillar in nursing and patient care settings since, through it, healthcare professionals can offer the most current and evidence-supported patient care services. Therefore, it is important to consistently engage in the evidence-based process for quality and patient care improvement. The evidence-based process has various stages, with each stage important to the whole process. One of the most important stages is the implementation stage (Tucker & Gallagher-Ford, 2019). Therefore, it is important to come up with an implementation plan to act as a guide for implementing a proposed EBP intervention. As part of this project, a PICOT question was formulated, and a comprehensive literature review concerning the PICOT was accomplished. The PICOT focused on using automated fall detectors to reduce the rates of falls among hospitalized patients. Therefore, the purpose of this latest write-up is to formulate an implementation plan to act as a guide for the proposed solution’s implementation.
The Setting and How the Potential Subjects Will Be Accessed
The proposed project involves the use of automated fall detectors to reduce the rates of falls among elderly patients who are at risk of falls. As such, the proposed project’s setting will be an elderly patient care facility admitting patients of 65 years and above for various forms of care. The chosen setting will be appropriate for getting the targeted population as appropriate. The potential subjects for the project are elderly patients 65 years and above admitted to the facility. Every patient admitted to the facility during the study period will form part of the study subjects. Since the project will not deal with patient-identifiable data, there will be no need to obtain informed consent. However, there will be a need to obtain approval from the facility that gives the go-ahead to implement the proposed project.
The Timeline
The timeline document is a vital document that should be drafted at the start of the project since it helps in guiding the project as appropriate. A timeline helps the project implementers to know when to perform various actions and what pace to execute various parts of the project (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2019). The project is, therefore, proposed to take a period of six months. Within six months, various aspects will be accomplished, such as starting the project’s initial phase, literature review and critique, implementation, project monitoring, evaluation, and closure. It is projected that this time will also be sufficient to undertake correction measures to boost the chances of the project’s success. The draft timeline has been included as part of the appendices.
The Budget and Resource List
The clinical issue that led to the proposal of using automated fall detectors was patient falls among elderly individuals of 65 years and above. Therefore, there will be a need to change from the current practice and use automated fall detectors. As such, there will be a need to acquire financial resources to support the installation of the fall detectors and the training of nurses on how to use the fall detectors. The implication is that this project requires financial and human resources to work successfully (Grove & Gray, 2018). The provision of education would be a way of helping the nurses change from the usual routine to the use of new technology.
Apart from the financial resources that will be needed to purchase and install the automated fall detectors and purchase the educational materials, other funds will be needed to hire trainers, conduct data collection, and in project monitoring and evaluation. In addition, other funds will also be needed to cover any unpredictable spending (Nieswiadomy & Bailey, 2018). As part of the resources, sufficient time will be needed for the successful completion of the project. The budget draft has also been included as part of the appendices.
The Proposed Study Design
Study designs are key to achieving project objectives by following the project design as planned. Therefore, it is important to choose the most appropriate study design that would help in fulfilling the project’s purpose and goals. As such, a quantitative study design has been chosen for the project. Quantitative methods will be used in data collection, data analysis, and interpretation of the obtained results. The quantitative design has been chosen since it will enhance the efficiency of assessing the effectiveness of the implemented intervention (Bloomfield, J., & Fisher, 2019). In addition, through a quantitative design approach, it will be easier to collect data and analyze the data more efficiently as opposed to the qualitative approach, which may require thematic analysis known to consume time. The implication is that the quantitative approach is relatively cheaper as compared to the qualitative approach.
Methods and Instruments
Various methods and instruments will be used in the implementation of the proposed project. One such instrument is questionnaires. It will be key to obtain baseline data on the nurses’ knowledge regarding the use of automated fall detectors so that appropriate approaches can be used to enhance their knowledge in preparation for the testing and implementation of the fall detectors. Electronic health records will also be a vital tool in this project (Baumann et al.,2018). The electronic health records will be used to obtain the baseline data regarding the rates of patient falls before the implementation of the proposed solution and after the intervention to help determine the efficacy of the proposed solution.
The Process of Delivering The Intervention
The intervention is meant to prevent falls among older patients who are at risk of falling. Therefore, an appropriate plan should be in place on how to deliver the intervention. As such, the intervention will be delivered in distinct stages. The first stage will entail a needs assessment (Portney, 2020). This face will require exploring the data on patient falls as well as the nurses’ existing knowledge on the use of interventions such as automated fall detectors to prevent and control the rates of falls. The data obtained from the needs assessment phase will be important in creating strategies to be used in the project. The next stage entails an education exercise for the nurses to help them obtain adequate knowledge on the use of automated fall detectors. It is important to note that the staff will be evaluated and continuous monitoring performed so that they follow the established guidelines. The proposed intervention will then be implemented to start detecting any potential falls in the care environment and ensure the nurses use the new intervention.
The Project Stakeholder
Stakeholders are an important part of a project as they are affected either directly or indirectly by the project. As such, it is vital that they are identified in time so that they get engaged to reduce the chances of resisting the project (Dang et al.,2021). As such, various stakeholders have been identified to be part of this project. The stakeholders include patients and their families, the nurses working in the elderly facility, the nurse manager, and the finance officer. The finance office will play a key role in determining how feasible the project is by presenting cost-benefit analysis reports and commenting on the overall financial impact of the project. The nurse manager will play the role of coordinating with the facility leaders to avail the required resources. The nurses will take center stage in the implementation process as they will be tasked with using the intervention to help control and prevent falls in the facility. The patients and their families are directly affected by the project; hence they form part of the stakeholder team.
Potential Barriers and How to Overcome Them
Implementation of an evidence-based practice project may face various barriers and complications which may threaten the success of such a project. Hence it is important to identify them and come up with potential mitigating strategies. One of them is the possibility of resistance by the nursing staff which can be overcome by involving them from the early stages (Mathieson et al.,2019). Another potential barrier is the lack of enough support from the leadership team. Such a barrier can be overcome by aligning the project goals and objectives with those of the organization. It is important to note that the organization is result driven, and therefore, over the years, the leaders have engaged in various activities such as EBP to improve the chances of better patient care services. Coupled with the nursing team always ready to learn and embrace change, the project is feasible, and therefore, its implementation is expected to be a success.
Conclusion
Implementation is one of the most important phases of the EBP process. As such, an appropriate plan for the same should be put in place. The write-up has presented various aspects of the implementation plan. It is also evident that the project is feasible and will likely succeed in the chosen environment.
Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Implementation Plan NUR 590 References
Baumann, L. A., Baker, J., & Elshaug, A. G. (2018). The impact of electronic health record systems on clinical documentation times: A systematic review. Health Policy, 122(8), 827-836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.05.014
Bloomfield, J., & Fisher, M. J. (2019). Quantitative research design. Journal of the Australasian Rehabilitation Nurses Association, 22(2), 27–30. Doi: 10.3316/INFORMIT.738299924514584
Dang, D., Dearholt, S. L., Bissett, K., Ascenzi, J., & Whalen, M. (2021). Johns Hopkins evidence-based practice for nurses and healthcare professionals: Model and guidelines. Sigma Theta Tau
Grove, S. K., & Gray, J. R. (2018). Understanding nursing research e-book: Building an evidence-based practice. Elsevier health sciences.
Mathieson, A., Grande, G., & Luker, K. (2019). Strategies, facilitators and barriers to implementation of evidence-based practice in community nursing: a systematic mixed-studies review and qualitative synthesis. Primary Health Care Research & Development, 20, e6. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1463423618000488
Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2019). Evidence-based Practice in Nursing & Healthcare: A Guide to Best Practice. Wolters Kluwer.
Nieswiadomy, R. M., & Bailey, C. (2018). Foundations of nursing research. Pearson.
Portney, L. G. (2020). Foundations of clinical research: applications to evidence-based practice. FA Davis.
Tucker, S. J., & Gallagher-Ford, L. (2019). EBP 2.0: From strategy to implementation. AJN The American Journal of Nursing, 119(4), 50–52. Doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000554549.01028.af
Several studies have found that individual and organizational factors including lack of time to read literature, heavy workload, lack of staff experience in EBP, and lack of resources are the most common barriers to the implementation of EBP (Alqahtani et al., 2022)
Our organization is constantly rolling out initiatives or projects and is always striving for quality care improvement just like every organization. The strategy for the roll-out is always to tap into the local or facility managers who in turn will delegate the task or assign a champion for the initiative. Training and resources will be provided along with ongoing support as needed. Every time a new project is introduced, my biggest challenge as an area manager is getting the facility managers engaged. The facility managers need to truly believe that the change will bring forth better quality outcomes and will eventually result in a better workflow at the point of care. If the facility managers are engaged, they can easily convince their staff and appoint a facility champion for the project for a more successful and sustainable implementation of the project. The most common barrier to the implementation of change coming from direct patient care staff would be lack of time, resources and, heavy workload. To overcome this barrier the staff needs to understand and is committed to the project implementation and reset their priorities accordingly. Leadership may need to respond to the issue of heavy workload to avoid staff burnout.
Reference:
Alqahtani, J. M., Carsula, R. P., Alharbi, H. A., Alyousef, S. M., Baker, O. G., & Tumala, R. B. (2022). Barriers to implementing evidence-based practice among primary healthcare nurses in Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional study. Nursing Reports (Pavia, Italy), 12(2), 313–323. https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep12020031

Don’t wait until the last minute
Fill in your requirements and let our experts deliver your work asap.