Capella University Health Care Information Review Proposal Assignment

Capella University Health Care Information Review Proposal Assignment

Description

Write an executive summary (1-2 pages) for senior leaders that highlights key information about the proposed health care information review of the quality of care given to a specific population. Detail the proposed implementation steps and associated time frames in a Gantt chart (1-page chart).

INTRODUCTION

As the office manager of your physician group, you realize that obtaining funding for your proposal will require the approval of the physician group’s senior leaders. You and the others helping you implement the proposal will need the details your proposal contains. From experience, however, you have learned the senior leaders will not take the time to review all the details. For them to approve your proposal, they simply want the highlights of what you plan to do, a brief explanation of how it will identify the quality of patient care, and the amount of time it will take to complete the study. In this final assessment, you will prepare an executive summary for the senior leaders of your physician group. Your executive summary is an abbreviated version of your proposal.

Please carefully review this assessment’s scoring guide to better understand the performance levels relating to each criterion on which you will be evaluated.

DEMONSTRATION OF PROFICIENCY

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the course competencies through the following assessment scoring guide criteria:

  • Competency 1: Outline the steps of the health care information life cycle.
    • Create a Gantt chart detailing the steps and time frames for study implementation.
  • Competency 2: Apply laws governing health information confidentiality, privacy, and security.
    • Describe how the plan will implement data security measures.
  • Competency 3: Assess system applications used to operationalize health information.
    • Explain rationale for proposed health care information review study.
  • Specify what information will be collected and from which applications.
    • Summarize how the proposed study will improve the quality of care delivered by the physician group.
  • Competency 4: Determine how a health information exchange (HIE) affects the management of patient data, clinical knowledge, and population data.
    • Design evidence-based best practices to ensure data meet interoperability standards with an HIE.
  • Competency 5: Integrate quality and change management strategies.
    • Incorporate evidence-based quality and change management strategies.
  • Competency 6: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and respectful of the diversity, dignity, and integrity of others, and consistent with the expectations for health care professionals.
    • Write clearly, with correct spelling, grammar, syntax, and good organization.
    • Apply proper APA formatting and style to your citations and references.

INSTRUCTIONS

Download and use the Executive Summary Template [DOCX]. You will complete this assessment by replacing all italicized instructional text with your own words.

Executive Summary
Overview
  • State your proposal’s big idea in the Overview.
  • Explain the information you plan to collect and the reasons why it is important to collect it.
  • Describe how this information could validate the quality of care delivered by your facility.

Note: Your Overview needs to be shorter than the Introduction from your proposal. Remember the entire narrative portion of your Executive Summary needs to be less than two pages. You will have an additional page for your Gantt chart.

Key Study Components
  • Include a subheading labeled, Data Collection Plan.
    • Distill down into 1–2 sentences the most important information about your implementation plan and the information you plan to collect at your facility.
  • Include a subheading labeled, Data Security Plan.
    • Highlight in 1–2 sentences the most important information about your plan to ensure data security that your senior leaders need to know.
  • Include a subheading labeled, Benchmarking Plan.
    • Provide a 1–2-sentence overview about the best practices (benchmarks that will be used) and procedures your study will use to ensure the data you collect meets standards for interoperability with an HIE.
  • Include a subheading labeled, Quality and Change Management Strategies.
    • Summarize in 1–2 sentences how your plan incorporates quality and change management strategies.
Conclusion
  • State how your proposed study will improve the quality of patient care delivered by your physician group. You Conclusion needs to be one paragraph of no more than five or six sentences.
Reference
  • List one reference in APA format to benefit your senior leaders.
Gantt Chart

Include with your Executive Summary a one-page Gantt chart that specifies the major steps in your implementation plan and the time frame associated with each step. Microsoft Excel is one tool you can use to create your chart. Your suggested readings supply additional information about how to create a Gantt chart in Excel. Please feel free to use other tools. The only requirement is that your Gantt chart specify the major steps in your implementation plan and the time frame associated with each step.

ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS

  • Written communication: Your executive summary must be concise, clear and well organized, with correct spelling, grammar, and syntax, to support orderly exposition of content. Use the Executive Summary Template.
  • Assessment Title: You may devise your own title of 5–15 words for the executive summary or use Executive Summary – Health Care Information Review. Enter the other required information specified on the template.
  • References: Specify one peer-reviewed reference that will benefit your senior leaders in the appropriate space on your template. Your reference should conform to APA formatting.
  • Length: 1–2 typed, single-spaced pages. The narrative portion of your executive summary should be preferably one page; it should not exceed two pages. You will have an additional page containing your Gantt chart.
  • Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.

ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER ASSIGNMENT: Capella University Health Care Information Review Proposal Assignment

You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes.

Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages.

Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor.

The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument.

Online Nursing Essays

Struggling to Meet Your Deadline?

Get your assignment on Capella University Health Care Information Review Proposal Assignment done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!

ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS

Discussion Questions (DQ)

Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, include a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words.
Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source.
One or two sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words.
I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.
Weekly Participation

Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately.
In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies.
Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work).
Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.
APA Format and Writing Quality

Familiarize yourself with APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required).
Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation.
I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.
Use of Direct Quotes

I discourage overutilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Masters’ level and deduct points accordingly.
As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content.
It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source.
LopesWrite Policy

For assignments that need to be submitted to LopesWrite, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me.
Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes.
Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own?
Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.
Late Policy

The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies.
Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances.
If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect.
I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension.
As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.
Communication

Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me:
Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class.
Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.

Health Care Information Review Proposal Scoring Guide

Health Care Information Review Proposal Scoring Guide
Criteria Non-performance Basic Proficient Distinguished
Explain rationale for proposed health care information review procedures. Does not propose health care information review procedures. Proposes health care information review procedures, but does not explain rationale in all instances. Explains rationale for proposed health care information review procedures. Concisely evaluates options for proposed health care information review procedures and explains rationale for choices.
Map the flow of health record information. Does not map the flow of health record information. Maps the flow of health record information, but there are some errors or omissions. Maps the flow of health record information. Maps an efficient and comprehensive flow of health record information, clearly and concisely.
Plan procedures and human resource requirements to manage the information. Does not plan procedures and human resource requirements for an information system. Plans procedures and human resource requirements for an information system, but significant elements are missing. Plans procedures and human resource requirements for an information system. Plans cogent, efficient, and complete procedures and human resource requirements for an information system.
Plan data security measures. Does not plan data security measures. Plans data security measures, but significant elements are missing. Plans data security measures. Plans efficient, achievable, and comprehensive data security measures.
Plan evidence-based best practices or procedures to ensure data meet standards for interoperability with an HIE. Does not plan practices or procedures to ensure data meet standards for interoperability with an HIE. Plans practices or procedures to ensure data meet standards for interoperability with an HIE, but some elements are missing or are not evidence-based. Plans evidence-based best practices or procedures to ensure data meet standards for interoperability with an HIE. Plans clear, comprehensive protocols based on evidence-based best practices or procedures to ensure data meet standards for interoperability with both benchmarking and quality standards from an HIE.
Plan evidence-based quality and change management strategies. Does not plan quality and change management strategies. Plans quality and change management strategies, but does not cite relevant evidence-based strategies. Plans evidence-based quality and change management strategies. Evaluates evidence-based quality and change management strategies, and plans implementation of those deemed to be most effective.
Detail steps and time frames for implementing a study. Does not outline steps and time frames for implementing a study. Outlines steps and time frames for implementing a study, but there are errors or omissions. Details steps and time frames for implementing a study. Details efficient steps and achievable time frames for implementing a study, and plans contingencies for risks.
Write clearly, with correct spelling, grammar, and syntax, and good organization. Does not write clearly, and there are errors in spelling, grammar, syntax, and organization. Writes clearly overall, but there are some errors in spelling, grammar, syntax, or organization. Writes clearly, with correct spelling, grammar, and syntax, and good organization. Writes concisely with excellent clarity and organization, with no errors in spelling, grammar, or syntax, and employing critical or analytical reasoning as needed.
Apply proper APA formatting and style to citations and references. Does not apply proper APA formatting and style to citations and references. Applies APA formatting and style to citations and references inconsistently and with significant errors. Applies proper APA formatting and style to citations and references. Consistently applies proper APA formatting and style to citations and references without errors.

Don’t wait until the last minute

Fill in your requirements and let our experts deliver your work asap.